06-28-2015, 03:16 PM
|
#21
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
|
I'm not expecting Acolatse to get qualified tommorow so I'm not including him as a Flames prospect. But I'd probably put him second last on both of these lists:
In terms of pure upside:
1) Oliver Kylington
2) Brandon Hickey
3) Kenney Morrison
4) Brett Kulak
5) Ryan Culkin
6) Rushan Rafikov
7) Rasmus Andersson
8) Keegan Kanzig
9) Tyler Wotherspoon
10) John Gilmour
11) Patrick Sieloff
12) Adam Ollas Mattsson
13) John Ramage
14) Riley Bruce
In terms of how close they are to being NHL-ready currently:
1) Tyler Wotherspoon
2) John Ramage
3) Kenney Morrison
4) Ryan Culkin
5) Brett Kulak
6) Rushan Rafikov
7) John Gilmour
8) Brandon Hickey
9) Patrick Sieloff
10) Rasmus Andersson
11) Oliver Kylington
12) Keegan Kanzig
13) Adam Ollas Mattsson
14) Riley Bruce
Now combining those two lists, with tiebreakers going to the younger player, I get:
1) Morrison - 24pts
2) Hickey - 20pts
3) Kulak - 20pts
4) Culkin - 20pts
5) Wotherspoon - 20pts
6) Kylington - 18pts
7) Rafikov - 18pts
8) Ramage - 15pts
9) Gilmour - 13pts
10) Sieloff - 10pts
11) Andersson - 9pts
12) Kanzig - 7pts
13) AOM - 5pts
14) Bruce - 2pts
I am happy with this list. I welcome Andersson's climb up it as he improves his conditioning and defensive zone awareness. And Kanzig's climb up as he becomes Zdeno Chara not Chris Breen.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
Last edited by GranteedEV; 06-28-2015 at 03:35 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-28-2015, 03:21 PM
|
#22
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
wow... there are a lot of guys here that are basically calling Trevling and the Flames management stupid in talent evaluation.
They picked Andersen at pick #53 and passed on Kylington.... full stop. Then 6 other teams passed on Kylington... 2 that picked d-men.
But based on some Central scouting report done 6 months ago that had Kylington highly rated they figure OMG we got a 1st rounder. They just choose to ignore the reports that in some games Kylington was awful... a game changer ... in a bad way.
There can be some arguments made in the abstract about Wotherspoon or Seiloff or Hickey being better or worse because of numerous variables. But in this clear cut case of talent evaluation taking 2 days ago .. the best hockey minds that the Flames can muster made a clear choice that Andersen was better than Kylington.
|
Flames drafted Sven Baertschi 3 rounds before Johnny Gaudreau. Perhaps, they really thought no one would take Kylington. They obviously liked him because they moved multiple picks to get him. It's entirely possible that the Flames had Andersen ranked below Kylington but picked Andersen first.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Geeoff For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-28-2015, 03:26 PM
|
#23
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
wow... there are a lot of guys here that are basically calling Trevling and the Flames management stupid in talent evaluation.
They picked Andersen at pick #53 and passed on Kylington.... full stop. Then 6 other teams passed on Kylington... 2 that picked d-men.
But based on some Central scouting report done 6 months ago that had Kylington highly rated they figure OMG we got a 1st rounder. They just choose to ignore the reports that in some games Kylington was awful... a game changer ... in a bad way.
There can be some arguments made in the abstract about Wotherspoon or Seiloff or Hickey being better or worse because of numerous variables. But in this clear cut case of talent evaluation taking 2 days ago .. the best hockey minds that the Flames can muster made a clear choice that Andersen was better than Kylington.
|
I'm willing to bet there's a lot of Flames scouts who had Kylington ranked MUCH higher than Andersson. Obviously the majority opinion was take Andersson because he's the safer pick, but that doesn't necessarily mean they all unanimously agreed Andersson was better. They were taken 7 picks apart, so for some of us to think they should have been taken in the reverse order is not outrageous. No one is saying Treliving is an idiot. NO ONE. Go read this forum the past two days, 99.99% of posts about him are praising the work he's done this draft.
|
|
|
06-28-2015, 03:30 PM
|
#24
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by N-E-B
I'm willing to bet there's a lot of Flames scouts who had Kylington ranked MUCH higher than Andersson. Obviously the majority opinion was take Andersson because he's the safer pick
|
It's also possible that Andersson being a right-handed shot was a big tiebreaker.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-28-2015, 03:32 PM
|
#25
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Montreal
|
1- Kylington
2- Hickey
3- Andersson
4- Wotherspoon
5- Morisson
6- Rafikov
7- Kulak
8- Culkin
9- Seiloff
10- Ollas-Matsson
11- Kanzig
12- Gilmour
13- Ramage
14- Acolatse
15- Bruce
Last edited by Red Menace; 06-28-2015 at 03:35 PM.
|
|
|
06-28-2015, 03:36 PM
|
#26
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Armpit of BC: Trail
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Menace
1- Kylington
2- Hickey
3- Andersson
4- Wotherspoon
5- Morisson
6- Rafikov
7- Kulak
8- Culkin
9- Seiloff
10- Ollas-Matsson
11- Gilmour
12- Ramage
13- Acolatse
14- Bruce
|
I would put Ollas-Matsson ahead of Kulak and Gilmour above Seiloff. This is pretty much it though.
__________________
Disregard any and all THANKS I give. I'm a dirty, dirty thanks-whore.
|
|
|
06-28-2015, 03:36 PM
|
#27
|
Celebrated Square Root Day
|
How ironic is that Ricardodw is pulling the old "defer to the professionals....full stop" or you're an idiot line, when he's made a whole CP career of thoroughly explaining how he's smarter than the professionals using wacky numbers and crazy stats at every opportunity. Baffling.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jayswin For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-28-2015, 03:36 PM
|
#28
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff
Flames drafted Sven Baertschi 3 rounds before Johnny Gaudreau. Perhaps, they really thought no one would take Kylington. They obviously liked him because they moved multiple picks to get him. It's entirely possible that the Flames had Andersen ranked below Kylington but picked Andersen first.
|
If the Flames had Kylington ranked higher then Andersen what in the world would make them not pick him? Owner interference? Clerical mistake? Too hard a name to say?
|
|
|
06-28-2015, 03:47 PM
|
#29
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flameswin
How ironic is that Ricardodw is pulling the old "defer to the professionals....full stop" or you're an idiot line, when he's made a whole CP career of thoroughly explaining how he's smarter than the professionals using wacky numbers and crazy stats at every opportunity. Baffling.
|
Not at all true..... I am constantly explaining what Burke and now Trevling are doing to build this team.
1) Get rid of Boumeester... check
2) Get rid of Stempniak ... check
3) Play at most 4 small no hitting skilled players.... check (got rid of Tanguay, Cammalleri, Baertschi, Cervenka, Smith, Butler and Babchuck)
They brought in Raymond to be one of the no-hitters but he got bench when Gaudreau was NHL ready.
The reason that they like Anderssen over Kylington probably is the compete level.... Anderson 4/5 ... Kylington 3/5. The whole tyrn around with the Flames is an individual hockey smarts and high compete level.
|
|
|
06-28-2015, 03:52 PM
|
#30
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV
I'm not expecting Acolatse to get qualified tommorow so I'm not including him as a Flames prospect. But I'd probably put him second last on both of these lists:
In terms of pure upside:
1) Oliver Kylington
2) Brandon Hickey
3) Kenney Morrison
4) Brett Kulak
5) Ryan Culkin
6) Rushan Rafikov
7) Rasmus Andersson
8) Keegan Kanzig
9) Tyler Wotherspoon
10) John Gilmour
11) Patrick Sieloff
12) Adam Ollas Mattsson
13) John Ramage
14) Riley Bruce
In terms of how close they are to being NHL-ready currently:
1) Tyler Wotherspoon
2) John Ramage
3) Kenney Morrison
4) Ryan Culkin
5) Brett Kulak
6) Rushan Rafikov
7) John Gilmour
8) Brandon Hickey
9) Patrick Sieloff
10) Rasmus Andersson
11) Oliver Kylington
12) Keegan Kanzig
13) Adam Ollas Mattsson
14) Riley Bruce
Now combining those two lists, with tiebreakers going to the younger player, I get:
1) Morrison - 24pts
2) Hickey - 20pts
3) Kulak - 20pts
4) Culkin - 20pts
5) Wotherspoon - 20pts
6) Kylington - 18pts
7) Rafikov - 18pts
8) Ramage - 15pts
9) Gilmour - 13pts
10) Sieloff - 10pts
11) Andersson - 9pts
12) Kanzig - 7pts
13) AOM - 5pts
14) Bruce - 2pts
I am happy with this list. I welcome Andersson's climb up it as he improves his conditioning and defensive zone awareness. And Kanzig's climb up as he becomes Zdeno Chara not Chris Breen.
|
Well done.
I don't entirely agree with the order, but absolutely love the method.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-28-2015, 03:54 PM
|
#31
|
Franchise Player
|
There's a clear top 5 in Kylington, Hickey, Andersson, Morrisson and Wotherspoon. All have top 4 potential imo.
|
|
|
06-28-2015, 03:59 PM
|
#32
|
Celebrated Square Root Day
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
Not at all true..... I am constantly explaining what Burke and now Trevling are doing to build this team.
1) Get rid of Boumeester... check
2) Get rid of Stempniak ... check
3) Play at most 4 small no hitting skilled players.... check (got rid of Tanguay, Cammalleri, Baertschi, Cervenka, Smith, Butler and Babchuck)
They brought in Raymond to be one of the no-hitters but he got bench when Gaudreau was NHL ready.
The reason that they like Anderssen over Kylington probably is the compete level.... Anderson 4/5 ... Kylington 3/5. The whole tyrn around with the Flames is an individual hockey smarts and high compete level.
|
So by that reasoning, you'd have to have had Gaudreau waaaaaaay down in any forward prospect charts at all times during his development and his NHL upside would have to have been lower than most prospects, after all that's where management picked him.....full stop, right?
I appreciate your passion for the game, but you just don't think things through all the way.
|
|
|
06-28-2015, 04:01 PM
|
#33
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
Not at all true..... I am constantly explaining what Burke and now Trevling are doing to build this team.
1) Get rid of Boumeester... check
2) Get rid of Stempniak ... check
3) Play at most 4 small no hitting skilled players.... check (got rid of Tanguay, Cammalleri, Baertschi, Cervenka, Smith, Butler and Babchuck)
They brought in Raymond to be one of the no-hitters but he got bench when Gaudreau was NHL ready.
The reason that they like Anderssen over Kylington probably is the compete level.... Anderson 4/5 ... Kylington 3/5. The whole tyrn around with the Flames is an individual hockey smarts and high compete level.
|
Flames Trade Jay Bouwmeester - April 1st 2013
Flames don't give Cervenka new contract, signs in Europe - May 16th 2013
Flames don't give Babchuk new contract, signs in Europe - May 28th 2013
Flames trade Alex Tanguay - June 27th 2013
Flames Hire Brian Burke - September 5th 2013
|
|
|
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to MrMastodonFarm For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-28-2015, 04:04 PM
|
#34
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flameswin
How ironic is that Ricardodw is pulling the old "defer to the professionals....full stop" or you're an idiot line, when he's made a whole CP career of thoroughly explaining how he's smarter than the professionals using wacky numbers and crazy stats at every opportunity. Baffling.
|
Wacky numbers and crazy stats? Are you saying NHL general manager's don't use RGI?
|
|
|
06-28-2015, 04:04 PM
|
#35
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
NHL-ready right now
01. Tyler Wotherspoon
02. John Ramage
03. Ryan Culkin
04. Kenney Morrison
05. Brett Kulak
06. Brandon Hickey
07. Keegan Kanzig
08. Rushan Rafikov
09. Patrick Sieloff
10. John Gilmour
11. Adam Ollas Mattsson
12. Rasmus Andersson
13. Oliver Kylington
14. Riley Bruce
Sena Acolatse is out
|
|
|
06-28-2015, 04:05 PM
|
#36
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
Flames Trade Jay Bouwmeester - April 1st 2013
Flames don't give Cervenka new contract, signs in Europe - May 16th 2013
Flames don't give Babchuk new contract, signs in Europe - May 28th 2013
Flames trade Alex Tanguay - June 27th 2013
Flames Hire Brian Burke - September 5th 2013
|
I guess Feaster was trying to hang onto his job by following my advice.
|
|
|
06-28-2015, 04:05 PM
|
#37
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Wow. Just wow.
It's not just the outlandish things Ricardow thinks and says, it's that he manages to do it with an air of authority that he's the genius while lecturing others about his incorrect assertions and one dimensional contrived ramblings.
|
|
|
06-28-2015, 04:07 PM
|
#38
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
I guess Feaster was trying to hang onto his job by following my advice.
|
Delusions of grandeur
|
|
|
06-28-2015, 04:09 PM
|
#39
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoJetsGo
Wow. Just wow.
It's not just the outlandish things Ricardow thinks and says, it's that he manages to do it with an air of authority that he's the genius while lecturing others about his incorrect assertions and one dimensional contrived ramblings.
|
I just chose to not read his posts. Life on CP is easier that way.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey Fan #751
The Oilers won't finish 14th in the West forever.
Eventually a couple of expansion teams will be added which will nestle the Oilers into 16th.
|
|
|
|
06-28-2015, 04:11 PM
|
#40
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by N-E-B
Wacky numbers and crazy stats? Are you saying NHL general manager's don't use RGI?
|
are you even suggesting that all GM's and NHL teams do not have some sort of team toughness measurement and standard that they are following? I would hope that it is more extensive and the statistics more accurate and analysis more sophisticated than the little spare time exercise that I put up.
It is just an accident that all successful teams have a few small talented guys surrounded by beef that allows them to use their skills to win hockey games?
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:08 PM.
|
|