Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-25-2015, 08:47 PM   #21
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

He's making Treliving's decision tougher with his play tonight.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2015, 08:55 PM   #22
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

The kid has hustle that is for sure. Doesn't make mistakes out there either
neo45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2015, 08:58 PM   #23
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

One of those unsung kind of guys. Works hard, like Neo says, make very little mistakes. And a good right hand shot too.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2015, 09:01 PM   #24
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Flames building the kind of depth you need to go far in the playoffs.
__________________
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2015, 09:02 PM   #25
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop View Post
Flames building the kind of depth you need to go far in the playoffs.
Not only that; they're building the kind of depth you need after you go far in the playoffs, when you have to trade guys away to stay under the cap, Chicago style.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2015, 09:03 PM   #26
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Every time I watch Shore play, he has at least one Datsyuk-esque interception per game.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2015, 09:21 PM   #27
_Q_
#1 Goaltender
 
_Q_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Everyone must be watching a different Drew Shore than me. He looks invisible at best and horrible at worst tonight.
_Q_ is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to _Q_ For This Useful Post:
Old 09-25-2015, 09:35 PM   #28
Five-hole
Franchise Player
 
Five-hole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The C-spot
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Q_ View Post
Everyone must be watching a different Drew Shore than me. He looks invisible at best and horrible at worst tonight.
Guess so. He's had a solid NHL game tonight. Good attention to detail.
Five-hole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2015, 10:07 PM   #29
Fighting Banana Slug
#1 Goaltender
 
Fighting Banana Slug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I thought he was really solid tonight. Some tough decisions for sure.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
Fighting Banana Slug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2015, 10:07 PM   #30
442scotty
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

I really didn't see anything special from shore either... Don't see him on the team with so many other guys coming along
442scotty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2015, 10:11 PM   #31
activeStick
Franchise Player
 
activeStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

He's not flashy but you can tell he's a smart player. I don't see him able to move up the Flames depth chart, and the fourth line C position would be the only spot he can possibly take.
activeStick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2015, 10:33 PM   #32
Karl
Franchise Player
 
Karl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by activeStick View Post
He's not flashy but you can tell he's a smart player. I don't see him able to move up the Flames depth chart, and the fourth line C position would be the only spot he can possibly take.
He might also possibly be able to take a 4th line right wing position, but that's questionable too.

That said, the GM could try and make some trades to free up space for younger guys who are ready. Problem is, I doubt that any of the vets people would like moved (Raymond, Stajan, Engelland & Smid) can be moved right now. Tough sell to move them at this time when other teams are dealing with a lot of the same problems. And burying these dudes in the A is not a good solution either.

Best hope IMO is to trade one or more of these guys later on in the season.

Last edited by Karl; 09-25-2015 at 10:41 PM.
Karl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2015, 10:38 PM   #33
activeStick
Franchise Player
 
activeStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default I like Drew Shore

Stajan and Raymond are really the only guys that qualify from your post to move to make room for Shore.

Based on interviews and comments from players and management I get the feeling Stajan is a big part of the leadership group though, so I can't see that happening despite how badly some people want him gone.

Raymond is good to go, but he's likely not getting a lot of interest right now

Last edited by activeStick; 09-25-2015 at 11:06 PM.
activeStick is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to activeStick For This Useful Post:
Old 09-25-2015, 10:49 PM   #34
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

I think Byron and Raymond are simply put on waivers. I don't see either being claimed whereas Shore probably would be. I suppose a team could take a flyer on Byron, but a lot of teams are facing similar logjams up front
neo45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2015, 07:23 AM   #35
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

I'd waive Raymond. I've defended him when the team wasn't deep, but he really doesn't fit anymore. If he was picked up, great (not gonna happen). Probably should have been a buyout in the offseason, but maybe Treliving figures to get an asset for a salary dump (with some retention).

Byron might get waived, he looked ok last night, but no better than Shore, with less size. If he was waived and picked up I'm happy for him because he will play somewhere. The only problem with waivers is Edmonton's likely picking position.

Shore did exactly what he needed to do - use his size, play decent centre.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2015, 07:33 AM   #36
EVERLAST
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by neo45 View Post
I think Byron and Raymond are simply put on waivers. I don't see either being claimed whereas Shore probably would be. I suppose a team could take a flyer on Byron, but a lot of teams are facing similar logjams up front
Coaching staff loves Byron and what he brings. This waivers cap you are talking won't happen.
EVERLAST is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to EVERLAST For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2015, 07:49 AM   #37
BigRed
#1 Goaltender
 
BigRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default I like Drew Shore

Byron is the epitome of the current Flames culture. Can't see him going but who knows. He's a consistent bottom 6 guy who doesn't score much but is hugely valuable on the PK and sets the tone with his effort. Shore can be good but has been nowhere near as consistent as Byron thus far in his career.

The writing is really on the wall for Raymond. Feel bad for the guy but he's not even a top 15 fwd on this team right now.

With the camp he's had so fear, have to think Ferland is a lock. Any or all of Arnold, Granlund, Shore could be effective NHLers this year if not for the players taking up space ahead of them. That's not even counting guys like Hathaway who have surprised.

One way or the other, 3 or 4 NHL quality guys are going to the A or will be waived. Sucks for them but good problem to have.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Temporary_User View Post
I will eat a pubic hair if Giordano ever plays in the NHL again

Last edited by BigRed; 09-26-2015 at 07:53 AM.
BigRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2015, 07:53 AM   #38
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EVERLAST View Post
Coaching staff loves Byron and what he brings. This waivers cap you are talking won't happen.

Yep. It was Byrons first game since February/March and he was noticeable. Really don't see why some posters think he would be waived? If anything i think he is a lock for the 4th line. I like Shore and i think they will keep him as a pressbox replacement player. I think any player that can be sent down will be sent down. My guess is Flames trade Bollig. Raymond is put on waivers and sent down to Stockton. There is a chance that they just keep Raymond in the pressbox. If there are no injuries to forwards on opening night, and the flames keep 3 pressbox forwards, they will be Jooris, Shore, Raymond.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2015, 07:56 AM   #39
BigRed
#1 Goaltender
 
BigRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

Hope not. I think Jooris's ceiling is way higher than previously guessed. He's been a fireplug in camp and is ready to take a big step this year IMHO. Smart player with underrated skill and a lot of jam.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Temporary_User View Post
I will eat a pubic hair if Giordano ever plays in the NHL again
BigRed is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to BigRed For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2015, 08:54 AM   #40
D as in David
Franchise Player
 
D as in David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

As much as I like Byron, he's a player that I think would pass through waivers. And that's a good thing in that you get to keep a valuable asset (not good for him, obviously). On the other hand, I don't think Shore would pass through waivers and we'd end up losing an asset. Not saying Shore is a better player right now but that other teams would be more interested in Shore's size.
D as in David is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:14 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy