Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Reaction to the trade?
Hate it 3 0.51%
Dislike it 11 1.87%
Whelmed 161 27.38%
Like it 350 59.52%
Love it 63 10.71%
Voters: 588. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-19-2024, 11:02 AM   #321
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
He did?
Yes. Today.

Playoff competitive team.
ComixZone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2024, 11:02 AM   #322
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Plus TDL was a different scenario - NJD had a shot at the POs.
And they totally don't now.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2024, 11:02 AM   #323
Shazam
Franchise Player
 
Shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
Yes. Today.

Playoff competitive team.
Did he say which year?
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
Shazam is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Shazam For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2024, 11:03 AM   #324
GullFoss
#1 Goaltender
 
GullFoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
In most of the deals Conroy has made, the Flames got a decent roster player back - Sharangovich, Kuzmenko, and Bahl are all solid NHLers. Management is not stripping it down to the studs - they want to ice a competitive team every season. The playoffs are probably a long shot next season, but this isn’t a team that’s deliberately aiming for a bottom-of-the-league finish.
I disagree. IMO Sharangovich and Kuzmenko are here as 1-2 year reclamation projects. I think that Conroy intends to flip them for more draft capita/prospects/younger players at the deadline. That's the primary objective with those two players. It's not about icing a competitive team.

They are stripping down to the studs, but with some intelligence. In a similar vein, I would expect any UFAs they sign are 1-2 year contracts with overpay. So again...they can retain some salary and flip them for draft capital at the trade deadline.
GullFoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GullFoss For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2024, 11:03 AM   #325
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

I find it funny how people are complaining about the '25 first being protected when a couple of months ago, everyone was excited when the protected '25 first Vegas sent to Calgary turned into a '26 first the very next day (I know, it's not the same people and not the same reasons, but it still makes me laugh).

Either way, the Flames have 4 first round picks between the 2025 and 2026 Drafts. It will likely be 2 in each year, but could be 4 in 2026, which would be fun.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2024, 11:03 AM   #326
1991 Canadian
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

There is a (delusional) world where New Jersey falters next year enough to get the pick into the top 10, and the Flames end up holding both Vegas' and New Jersey's unprotected 2026 1st round picks....

Very unlikely given the trajectory of those teams, but a fun what-if to think about
1991 Canadian is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to 1991 Canadian For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2024, 11:04 AM   #327
Inferno
Franchise Player
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Pas, MB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
He did?
Not that they would make the playoffs. But that it shows they have a commitment to compete for the playoffs.
Inferno is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2024, 11:05 AM   #328
DropIt
Franchise Player
 
DropIt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
Exp:
Default

2 picks in the 1st round of the next 3 drafts?
DropIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2024, 11:05 AM   #329
Burner
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Burner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: winnipeg
Exp:
Default

at least its not Kevin Dahl
Burner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2024, 11:05 AM   #330
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
So the backend (barring an Andersson trade) is

Miromanov - Weegar
Bahl - Andersson
Kylington - Pachal/Hanley

With Hunter, Poirier, Solovyov, kuznetsov, grushnikov knocking on the door in the minors.

It is another rebuilding trade, another young asset and a pick coming coming back. Really wonder if Conroy is exploring options with Andersson. He has a bit of a NHL defence now and could possibly trade Rasmus for more rebuilding pieces and pick up a UFA to replace Rasmus.
No it's not. Conroy said this trade shows we are building a playoff competitive team.

We are going for it.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2024, 11:05 AM   #331
Tbull8
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1991 Canadian View Post
There is a (delusional) world where New Jersey falters next year enough to get the pick into the top 10, and the Flames end up holding both Vegas' and New Jersey's unprotected 2026 1st round picks....

Very unlikely given the trajectory of those teams, but a fun what-if to think about
The real question is would you rather have next years first (lets call it 20th) or a potential lottery ticket in 2026?. If only the flames could've gotten a choice condition on the pick.
Tbull8 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2024, 11:06 AM   #332
Sainters7
Franchise Player
 
Sainters7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: back in the 403
Exp:
Default

Yeah it always sounded odd to me we were going to get the 10th overall pick for a 34 year old goalie, even with the 28th OA pick, but that was the word on the street/insiders, so it's a little disappointing it's next year's (protected) 1st.
Sainters7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2024, 11:07 AM   #333
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Igottago View Post
Conroy is already the one saying that.
Actions speak louder than words. He just traded a starting goalie to run with one of the worst tandems in the league. Bahl is a decent toss in but he is a toss in.

The Flames now have a bottom 5 dcore, a bottom 5 tandem, and a bottom ten forward core. Will people only believe a rebuild is happening if Conroy comes out directly and says buckle up the Flames will suck for three years.

He is still technically holding true to his definition of not rebuilding which is trading away every vet lol.

Markstrom was my barometer for what management was actually thinking. They didn't have to trade him and they were going to get worse by doing it.
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Bonded For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2024, 11:07 AM   #334
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
I find it funny how people are complaining about the '25 first being protected when a couple of months ago, everyone was excited when the protected '25 first Vegas sent to Calgary turned into a '26 first the very next day (I know, it's not the same people and not the same reasons, but it still makes me laugh).

Either way, the Flames have 4 first round picks between the 2025 and 2026 Drafts. It will likely be 2 in each year, but could be 4 in 2026, which would be fun.
If things go south enough that New Jersey drafts in the top 10 again then that 2026 pick becomes insanely valuable. Fitz is gone and Keefe is on the hot seat - it’s definitely the preferred outcome
neo45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2024, 11:07 AM   #335
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

I predict this pick to be 11-20 next year.
keenan87 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2024, 11:08 AM   #336
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inferno View Post
Not that they would make the playoffs. But that it shows they have a commitment to compete for the playoffs.
Right but did he say when? We just got a 3rd pairing dman and a 1st in 2025. How are those 2 pieces going to help us this year?
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2024, 11:08 AM   #337
Flames Fan, Ph.D.
#1 Goaltender
 
Flames Fan, Ph.D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Underground
Exp:
Default

I really like Pat Steinberg but I’m listening now and he’s doing pretty obvious PR damage control for the Flames.

Don’t do it Pat. Not a good look.
Flames Fan, Ph.D. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2024, 11:09 AM   #338
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Fan, Ph.D. View Post
I really like Pat Steinberg but I’m listening now and he’s doing pretty obvious PR damage control for the Flames.

Don’t do it Pat. Not a good look.
What PR damage? Do you know something none of us do?
keenan87 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2024, 11:09 AM   #339
Torture
Loves Teh Chat!
 
Torture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jore View Post
Seems like a decent return, the pick protection sucks but an old goalie for a mid to low first sounds fine. We were never going to get premium futures for our teardown outside of crazy luck, it’s all about maximizing the value of our own firsts the coming years.

Time to worry about how the flames will use up all their cap space to float a 17th place team.
Honest question cause I've never understood how getting to the cap floor is a problem. Couldn't you just sign somebody to a 1 year crazy over-payment if you really needed to get to the floor?
Torture is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2024, 11:09 AM   #340
nieuwy-89
First Line Centre
 
nieuwy-89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Iggy-ville
Exp:
Default

Glad the Flames are continuing to ship out the malcontents. Markstom had to go. Getting a first rounder and a young NHL defenceman for an aging inconsistent goalie is good asset management. Not a slam dunk win, but the right thing to do.

To me, Markstrom will always be the Flames goalie who made Trevor Kidd and Brian Elliott look like a strong playoff performers. The way he quit on this team during the Edmonton series pretty much killed any goodwill from me. He never seemed to get up for big games including against our top rivals. Of all the guys we shipped out this year this is the one guy that deserves unrelenting boos from Flames fans.
nieuwy-89 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to nieuwy-89 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:32 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy