Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Waiver Result?
Pelletier and Cooley both clear 211 57.34%
Pelletier clears and Cooley is claimed 18 4.89%
Cooley clears and Pelleiter is claimed 110 29.89%
Pelletier and Cooley both get taken 29 7.88%
Voters: 368. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-07-2024, 08:33 AM   #301
HitterD
Powerplay Quarterback
 
HitterD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In my office...is it 5:00 yet???
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by topfiverecords View Post
Flames first round pick doesn’t pan out. News at 11.
Maybe I’m missing some inside joke here, but this really isn’t a thing anymore. Pelletier might be the only 1st since 2013 to not pan out. All other 1sts are legit NHL players, or in the case of the recent couple of drafts (Coronato and Honzek) are now tracking to be players.

One first round miss in 11 drafts is a vast improvement on the annual wasted (pelech, Nemisz etc) 1st round pick of old.
HitterD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2024, 08:38 AM   #302
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
Sharangovich starts the year on the IR, they didn't have to waive Pelletier. Or Cooley I suppose. Just weird decision making.
What's this now?

They were always going to waive Cooley, not sure what that has to do with JP?

Its far from a "weird" decision, and in fact its the exact same decision every team in the league made on their own players yesterday and throughout training camp.

If you aren't good enough to play in the NHL and there are guys better at you at this time...then you don't start in the NHL.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2024, 08:40 AM   #303
Savvy27
#1 Goaltender
 
Savvy27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
What does keeping Hanley on the roster accomplish ?
Eight D men is better for practices. In 5 on 5 drills and scrimmages it allows the defence to remain in their pairs and get the same amount of rest as forwards. Having two extra D is much more functional than have two extra forwards.
Savvy27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2024, 08:40 AM   #304
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
I just think too many people equate putting on waivers with getting rid of a player.

That's not the case at all.
Actually, since you are risking the player as he can be claimed, to some extent you may be.

It doesn't mean you think he's useless, but they are saying you think he's likely not to get claimed. Which is a statement in itself.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2024, 08:42 AM   #305
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
what's this now?

They were always going to waive cooley, not sure what that has to do with jp?

Its far from a "weird" decision, and in fact its the exact same decision every team in the league made on their own players yesterday and throughout training camp.

If you aren't good enough to play in the nhl and there are guys better at you at this time...then you don't start in the nhl.
https://twitter.com/user/status/1843295596398125427

Just saying I think they could have kept one of those guys rather than waive both. I may be mistaken.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Toonage For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2024, 08:48 AM   #306
Royle9
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
https://twitter.com/user/status/1843295596398125427

Just saying I think they could have kept one of those guys rather than waive both. I may be mistaken.
That's what I was saying yesterday, with Sharky going on the IR as I was told it was likely "weeks" I'm surprised they chose to waive him.

Guess we'll find out shortly if he was claimed, is it 10AM mst for the cutoff?
Royle9 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Royle9 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2024, 08:48 AM   #307
Toast_Man
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Who did they have Pelletier playing with in preseason? Did he even get a serious look? It feels like the ghost of Tre is in the building.
Toast_Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2024, 08:54 AM   #308
Yeah_Baby
Franchise Player
 
Yeah_Baby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: still in edmonton
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Royle9 View Post
That's what I was saying yesterday, with Sharky going on the IR as I was told it was likely "weeks" I'm surprised they chose to waive him.

Guess we'll find out shortly if he was claimed, is it 10AM mst for the cutoff?
I think the cut off is now 2 est, so 12 our time
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
Thats why Flames fans make ideal Star Trek fans. We've really been taught to embrace the self-loathing and extreme criticism.
Check out The Pod-Wraiths: A Star Trek Deep Space Nine Podcast
Yeah_Baby is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Yeah_Baby For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2024, 08:56 AM   #309
ResAlien
Lifetime In Suspension
 
ResAlien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toast_Man View Post
Who did they have Pelletier playing with in preseason? Did he even get a serious look? It feels like the ghost of Tre is in the building.
What it feels like is the ghost of oiler fans in here whining that a roster spot wasn’t gifted to an underperforming former first round pick. This wasn’t some gross miscarriage of justice: guy tried to make the team, guy didn’t play well enough to make the team, guy gets sent to the AHL. What’s so controversial here? Sheesh
ResAlien is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ResAlien For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2024, 08:58 AM   #310
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toast_Man View Post
Who did they have Pelletier playing with in preseason? Did he even get a serious look? It feels like the ghost of Tre is in the building.
Played with Backlund & Coleman at least twice
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Toonage For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2024, 09:02 AM   #311
rhino
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HitterD View Post
Maybe I’m missing some inside joke here, but this really isn’t a thing anymore. Pelletier might be the only 1st since 2013 to not pan out. All other 1sts are legit NHL players, or in the case of the recent couple of drafts (Coronato and Honzek) are now tracking to be players.

One first round miss in 11 drafts is a vast improvement on the annual wasted (pelech, Nemisz etc) 1st round pick of old.
And Pelletier was a late 1st in a relatively weak draft
rhino is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rhino For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2024, 09:02 AM   #312
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toast_Man View Post
Who did they have Pelletier playing with in preseason? Did he even get a serious look? It feels like the ghost of Tre is in the building.
Are you serious? Even if Pelletier ends up carving an NHL career, it's likely in a bottom 6 role. It's unfortunate that another 1st round pick didn't turn out but there's not point in fixating on past mistakes and I like that the team isn't getting caught up in the sunk cost fallacy. This organization needs to keep swinging at elite skillset players and not look back.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2024, 09:04 AM   #313
#-3
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Royle9 View Post
That's what I was saying yesterday, with Sharky going on the IR as I was told it was likely "weeks" I'm surprised they chose to waive him.

Guess we'll find out shortly if he was claimed, is it 10AM mst for the cutoff?
You waive the guy on the big waiver day because he is more likely to clear. then you can keep him up for a month and send him down later without waivers if need be. waiving a guy in 3 weeks is much higher risk.
#-3 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to #-3 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2024, 09:04 AM   #314
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Royle9 View Post
That's what I was saying yesterday, with Sharky going on the IR as I was told it was likely "weeks" I'm surprised they chose to waive him.

Guess we'll find out shortly if he was claimed, is it 10AM mst for the cutoff?
He can still play, though, even after he has been waived, no? I think the critical piece here is the timing. The Flames picked yesterday to waive him in an effort to make sure he clears. But, once Pelletier has cleared, I believe he can still play games with the Flames, if they want. The rationale is that he was more likely to clear yesterday than in the last week of October—he can still stay on the roster for 30 days or so before needing to be waived again.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2024, 09:06 AM   #315
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
I wonder if the reaction is the same with the Canes fan base over seeing Suzuki (drafted 2 spots after JP) being waived yesterday as well?

Also a bigger guy who plays C.

Maybe both clear and their is a "change of scenery" trade?
I doubt it. Suzuki still hasn’t played an NHL game and even as a much older player, his AHL performance doesn’t come close to Pelletier. Pelletier was maybe top 5 in the AHL for his age group.

Some fans seems to forget that Pelletier was on track before his injury. Now it’s a results league, and what matters is how you perform now but at least with Pelletier you can point to a significant factor that could lead to some optimism for his potential.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Strange Brew For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2024, 09:16 AM   #316
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
He can still play, though, even after he has been waived, no? I think the critical piece here is the timing. The Flames picked yesterday to waive him in an effort to make sure he clears. But, once Pelletier has cleared, I believe he can still play games with the Flames, if they want. The rationale is that he was more likely to clear yesterday than in the last week of October—he can still stay on the roster for 30 days or so before needing to be waived again.
This is my take as well. Yesterday was the best day to try and clear a guy.

That said, I think there is a good change MTL picks him up, since they are struggling with injuries.

I thought that Pelletier played well, but he was unable to steal a spot from someone else. He is far from bust, his positioning is NHL caliber it's just his strength in puck battles, and offensive drive that need improvement.
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2024, 09:21 AM   #317
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HitterD View Post
Maybe I’m missing some inside joke here, but this really isn’t a thing anymore. Pelletier might be the only 1st since 2013 to not pan out. All other 1sts are legit NHL players, or in the case of the recent couple of drafts (Coronato and Honzek) are now tracking to be players.

One first round miss in 11 drafts is a vast improvement on the annual wasted (pelech, Nemisz etc) 1st round pick of old.
From 2013 to Pelletier there was only one non top 6 pick, Valimaki and he was a bust as far as the Flames are concerned

The stats you pointed out really doesn’t say much but yeah in general you can’t say the flames drafted well or not recently
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2024, 09:23 AM   #318
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Are you serious? Even if Pelletier ends up carving an NHL career, it's likely in a bottom 6 role. It's unfortunate that another 1st round pick didn't turn out but there's not point in fixating on past mistakes and I like that the team isn't getting caught up in the sunk cost fallacy. This organization needs to keep swinging at elite skillset players and not look back.
Yeah he's not shaping up to be a great pick. The gamble was he had enough skill to be a middle 6 scoring winger. But he just doesn't seem to have that, and then doesn't have the size to fill a different role.

That part if the draft though hasn't produced anything. The remainder of the 1st was Nolan Foote, Ryan Suzuki, Brayden Tracey, John Beecher, and Ryan Johnson. I think at the time, some were lamenting that they didn't pick Kaliyev who went 33rd, and has 71 points in the NHL so far, but also a ton of warts.

The guy you probably would take in a do-over is Pinto at 32.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2024, 09:23 AM   #319
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05 View Post
From 2013 to Pelletier there was only one non top 6 pick, Valimaki and he was a bust as far as the Flames are concerned

The stats you pointed out really doesn’t say much but yeah in general you can’t say the flames drafted well or not recently
Nah....

Middle of the first round players that play 225 NHL games (so far) and have had crippling injuries aren't busts.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2024, 09:23 AM   #320
All In Good Time
First Line Centre
 
All In Good Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: I'm somewhere where I don't know where I am
Exp:
Default

All the consternation about Pelletier getting waived while there is an argument that there were forwards that out performed him in camp (some their first camp) that were cut days before him.
I believe he was treated really well considering his camp, how many camps he's been in and the day chosen to waive him. Every effort has been taken to keep him in the organization.
All In Good Time is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:17 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy