View Poll Results: Waiver Result?
|
Pelletier and Cooley both clear
|
  
|
211 |
57.34% |
Pelletier clears and Cooley is claimed
|
  
|
18 |
4.89% |
Cooley clears and Pelleiter is claimed
|
  
|
110 |
29.89% |
Pelletier and Cooley both get taken
|
  
|
29 |
7.88% |
10-07-2024, 08:33 AM
|
#301
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In my office...is it 5:00 yet???
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by topfiverecords
Flames first round pick doesn’t pan out. News at 11.
|
Maybe I’m missing some inside joke here, but this really isn’t a thing anymore. Pelletier might be the only 1st since 2013 to not pan out. All other 1sts are legit NHL players, or in the case of the recent couple of drafts (Coronato and Honzek) are now tracking to be players.
One first round miss in 11 drafts is a vast improvement on the annual wasted (pelech, Nemisz etc) 1st round pick of old.
|
|
|
10-07-2024, 08:38 AM
|
#302
|
Fearmongerer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage
Sharangovich starts the year on the IR, they didn't have to waive Pelletier. Or Cooley I suppose. Just weird decision making.
|
What's this now?
They were always going to waive Cooley, not sure what that has to do with JP?
Its far from a "weird" decision, and in fact its the exact same decision every team in the league made on their own players yesterday and throughout training camp.
If you aren't good enough to play in the NHL and there are guys better at you at this time...then you don't start in the NHL.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-07-2024, 08:40 AM
|
#303
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts
What does keeping Hanley on the roster accomplish ?
|
Eight D men is better for practices. In 5 on 5 drills and scrimmages it allows the defence to remain in their pairs and get the same amount of rest as forwards. Having two extra D is much more functional than have two extra forwards.
|
|
|
10-07-2024, 08:40 AM
|
#304
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
I just think too many people equate putting on waivers with getting rid of a player.
That's not the case at all.
|
Actually, since you are risking the player as he can be claimed, to some extent you may be.
It doesn't mean you think he's useless, but they are saying you think he's likely not to get claimed. Which is a statement in itself.
|
|
|
10-07-2024, 08:42 AM
|
#305
|
Taking a while to get to 5000
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
what's this now?
They were always going to waive cooley, not sure what that has to do with jp?
Its far from a "weird" decision, and in fact its the exact same decision every team in the league made on their own players yesterday and throughout training camp.
If you aren't good enough to play in the nhl and there are guys better at you at this time...then you don't start in the nhl.
|
https://twitter.com/user/status/1843295596398125427
Just saying I think they could have kept one of those guys rather than waive both. I may be mistaken.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Toonage For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-07-2024, 08:48 AM
|
#306
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage
|
That's what I was saying yesterday, with Sharky going on the IR as I was told it was likely "weeks" I'm surprised they chose to waive him.
Guess we'll find out shortly if he was claimed, is it 10AM mst for the cutoff?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Royle9 For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-07-2024, 08:48 AM
|
#307
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Calgary
Exp:  
|
Who did they have Pelletier playing with in preseason? Did he even get a serious look? It feels like the ghost of Tre is in the building.
|
|
|
10-07-2024, 08:54 AM
|
#308
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: still in edmonton
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Royle9
That's what I was saying yesterday, with Sharky going on the IR as I was told it was likely "weeks" I'm surprised they chose to waive him.
Guess we'll find out shortly if he was claimed, is it 10AM mst for the cutoff?
|
I think the cut off is now 2 est, so 12 our time
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Yeah_Baby For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-07-2024, 08:56 AM
|
#309
|
Lifetime In Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toast_Man
Who did they have Pelletier playing with in preseason? Did he even get a serious look? It feels like the ghost of Tre is in the building.
|
What it feels like is the ghost of oiler fans in here whining that a roster spot wasn’t gifted to an underperforming former first round pick. This wasn’t some gross miscarriage of justice: guy tried to make the team, guy didn’t play well enough to make the team, guy gets sent to the AHL. What’s so controversial here? Sheesh
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ResAlien For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-07-2024, 08:58 AM
|
#310
|
Taking a while to get to 5000
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toast_Man
Who did they have Pelletier playing with in preseason? Did he even get a serious look? It feels like the ghost of Tre is in the building.
|
Played with Backlund & Coleman at least twice
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Toonage For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-07-2024, 09:02 AM
|
#311
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HitterD
Maybe I’m missing some inside joke here, but this really isn’t a thing anymore. Pelletier might be the only 1st since 2013 to not pan out. All other 1sts are legit NHL players, or in the case of the recent couple of drafts (Coronato and Honzek) are now tracking to be players.
One first round miss in 11 drafts is a vast improvement on the annual wasted (pelech, Nemisz etc) 1st round pick of old.
|
And Pelletier was a late 1st in a relatively weak draft
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to rhino For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-07-2024, 09:02 AM
|
#312
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toast_Man
Who did they have Pelletier playing with in preseason? Did he even get a serious look? It feels like the ghost of Tre is in the building.
|
Are you serious? Even if Pelletier ends up carving an NHL career, it's likely in a bottom 6 role. It's unfortunate that another 1st round pick didn't turn out but there's not point in fixating on past mistakes and I like that the team isn't getting caught up in the sunk cost fallacy. This organization needs to keep swinging at elite skillset players and not look back.
|
|
|
10-07-2024, 09:04 AM
|
#313
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Royle9
That's what I was saying yesterday, with Sharky going on the IR as I was told it was likely "weeks" I'm surprised they chose to waive him.
Guess we'll find out shortly if he was claimed, is it 10AM mst for the cutoff?
|
You waive the guy on the big waiver day because he is more likely to clear. then you can keep him up for a month and send him down later without waivers if need be. waiving a guy in 3 weeks is much higher risk.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to #-3 For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-07-2024, 09:04 AM
|
#314
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Royle9
That's what I was saying yesterday, with Sharky going on the IR as I was told it was likely "weeks" I'm surprised they chose to waive him.
Guess we'll find out shortly if he was claimed, is it 10AM mst for the cutoff?
|
He can still play, though, even after he has been waived, no? I think the critical piece here is the timing. The Flames picked yesterday to waive him in an effort to make sure he clears. But, once Pelletier has cleared, I believe he can still play games with the Flames, if they want. The rationale is that he was more likely to clear yesterday than in the last week of October—he can still stay on the roster for 30 days or so before needing to be waived again.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-07-2024, 09:06 AM
|
#315
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
I wonder if the reaction is the same with the Canes fan base over seeing Suzuki (drafted 2 spots after JP) being waived yesterday as well?
Also a bigger guy who plays C.
Maybe both clear and their is a "change of scenery" trade?
|
I doubt it. Suzuki still hasn’t played an NHL game and even as a much older player, his AHL performance doesn’t come close to Pelletier. Pelletier was maybe top 5 in the AHL for his age group.
Some fans seems to forget that Pelletier was on track before his injury. Now it’s a results league, and what matters is how you perform now but at least with Pelletier you can point to a significant factor that could lead to some optimism for his potential.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Strange Brew For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-07-2024, 09:16 AM
|
#316
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
He can still play, though, even after he has been waived, no? I think the critical piece here is the timing. The Flames picked yesterday to waive him in an effort to make sure he clears. But, once Pelletier has cleared, I believe he can still play games with the Flames, if they want. The rationale is that he was more likely to clear yesterday than in the last week of October—he can still stay on the roster for 30 days or so before needing to be waived again.
|
This is my take as well. Yesterday was the best day to try and clear a guy.
That said, I think there is a good change MTL picks him up, since they are struggling with injuries.
I thought that Pelletier played well, but he was unable to steal a spot from someone else. He is far from bust, his positioning is NHL caliber it's just his strength in puck battles, and offensive drive that need improvement.
|
|
|
10-07-2024, 09:21 AM
|
#317
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HitterD
Maybe I’m missing some inside joke here, but this really isn’t a thing anymore. Pelletier might be the only 1st since 2013 to not pan out. All other 1sts are legit NHL players, or in the case of the recent couple of drafts (Coronato and Honzek) are now tracking to be players.
One first round miss in 11 drafts is a vast improvement on the annual wasted (pelech, Nemisz etc) 1st round pick of old.
|
From 2013 to Pelletier there was only one non top 6 pick, Valimaki and he was a bust as far as the Flames are concerned
The stats you pointed out really doesn’t say much but yeah in general you can’t say the flames drafted well or not recently
|
|
|
10-07-2024, 09:23 AM
|
#318
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
Are you serious? Even if Pelletier ends up carving an NHL career, it's likely in a bottom 6 role. It's unfortunate that another 1st round pick didn't turn out but there's not point in fixating on past mistakes and I like that the team isn't getting caught up in the sunk cost fallacy. This organization needs to keep swinging at elite skillset players and not look back.
|
Yeah he's not shaping up to be a great pick. The gamble was he had enough skill to be a middle 6 scoring winger. But he just doesn't seem to have that, and then doesn't have the size to fill a different role.
That part if the draft though hasn't produced anything. The remainder of the 1st was Nolan Foote, Ryan Suzuki, Brayden Tracey, John Beecher, and Ryan Johnson. I think at the time, some were lamenting that they didn't pick Kaliyev who went 33rd, and has 71 points in the NHL so far, but also a ton of warts.
The guy you probably would take in a do-over is Pinto at 32.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-07-2024, 09:23 AM
|
#319
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05
From 2013 to Pelletier there was only one non top 6 pick, Valimaki and he was a bust as far as the Flames are concerned
The stats you pointed out really doesn’t say much but yeah in general you can’t say the flames drafted well or not recently
|
Nah....
Middle of the first round players that play 225 NHL games (so far) and have had crippling injuries aren't busts.
|
|
|
10-07-2024, 09:23 AM
|
#320
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: I'm somewhere where I don't know where I am
|
All the consternation about Pelletier getting waived while there is an argument that there were forwards that out performed him in camp (some their first camp) that were cut days before him.
I believe he was treated really well considering his camp, how many camps he's been in and the day chosen to waive him. Every effort has been taken to keep him in the organization.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:17 AM.
|
|