Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Yeah, Friedman was talking about how hard he used to be on rookies, and then went on to suggest that Hartley has really embraced the rookies and is relishing the job of developing them now.
He didn't come right out and say it directly, but I go the impression that he was suggesting that Hartley had changed, and now appears to be great with the kids.
|
I was watching that, but I wasn't sure whether to believe it or not.
I believe Tanguay, Drury and Hejduk all broke out in the league under Hartley, and both had excellent rookie and sophomore campaigns. They were also paired with Sakic and Forsberg as well, which shows a lot of 'trust' by Hartley. A 23 year old Donovan, 24 year old Yelle, and a 23 year old Deadmarsh all saw lots of games under Hartley.
Goes to Atlanta, and I thought he did very well with the youth. A sophomore (21 year old) Heatley exploded under him. A sophomore (19 yo) Kovalchuk did very well under him. 21 year old Stefan - though established already - was also highly trusted by Hartley.
I am just not sure that Hartley was ever such a 'anti-youth' kind of guy. Hard, yes. I remember Tanguay talking about Hartley before he left Calgary and saying that Hartley was hard on him, but was 'good' for him. I would figure if Hartley was unbearable, then Tanguay probably wouldn't have been hoping for him to be hired.
I have no doubt that he has softened a bit, however. I just don't think he was as hard as Friedman was implying, as he gave lots of chances to some very young players and trusted them on the top lines during his coaching experience in the NHL, and had these kids thrive under his watch.