Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum > Food and Entertainment
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-29-2013, 01:38 PM   #261
octothorp
Franchise Player
 
octothorp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: not lurking
Exp:
Default

It's definitely not just Star Trek. When was the last time a big budget sci-fi (especially a space epic) was actually both emotionally and intellectually satisfying? I have a really difficult time coming up with that, even thinking back fifteen years or so... all the satisfying sci-fi comes from relatively small-budget productions (Gattica, Moon, District 9, etc.).

I really enjoyed both of the Abrams Star Trek films as summer sci-fi blockbusters... but I also totally respect the perspective that they don't have the same values as the originals. None of the ST:TNG movies were really thought-provoking either. Mostly they were just cashing in on nostalgia in an even more blatant way than the recent movies.
octothorp is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to octothorp For This Useful Post:
Old 05-29-2013, 01:56 PM   #262
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

mmmm Gattaca.. haven't watched that for a long time.

Sunshine (2007) is in that list for me too, though I'm not sure why, the science is "The Core" laughable, but still...
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to photon For This Useful Post:
Old 05-29-2013, 04:20 PM   #263
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by octothorp View Post
It's definitely not just Star Trek. When was the last time a big budget sci-fi (especially a space epic) was actually both emotionally and intellectually satisfying? I have a really difficult time coming up with that, even thinking back fifteen years or so... all the satisfying sci-fi comes from relatively small-budget productions (Gattica, Moon, District 9, etc.).

I really enjoyed both of the Abrams Star Trek films as summer sci-fi blockbusters... but I also totally respect the perspective that they don't have the same values as the originals. None of the ST:TNG movies were really thought-provoking either. Mostly they were just cashing in on nostalgia in an even more blatant way than the recent movies.
the problem to me with the new Star Treks is that they're really missing the emotional connection because they're going 5 million miles an hour and trying to pack as many laser shots and lense flares (I kid) into the movie.

You really don't have those quiet heartbeak moments like in the original series that lets you connect with the characters, and understand them. Its not like I don't like Pine's Kirk, but he's just so freaking one dimensional..

__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
Old 05-30-2013, 02:09 PM   #264
Ped
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
the problem to me with the new Star Treks is that they're really missing the emotional connection because they're going 5 million miles an hour and trying to pack as many laser shots and lense flares (I kid) into the movie.

You really don't have those quiet heartbeak moments like in the original series that lets you connect with the characters, and understand them. Its not like I don't like Pine's Kirk, but he's just so freaking one dimensional..
I think the problem is they're trying too hard.

I like Simon Pegg and I like Karl Urban and I like Anton Yelchin, but while I laughed at many of their scenes, I just kept getting the feeling they were acting rather then that was who they were.

Too many forced attempts at conversations where no one in their right mind would be stopping to talk.

Too many places where characters clearly do something just to prolong the plot (most glaringly, when Khan and Spock were fighting on the barge/transport/whatever. He was beating the tar out of Spock and kept throwing him where there was plenty of places for him to land, rather than just throw him over the edge.

I thought both Peter Weller and Benedict Cumberbatch were guilty of some overacting at times.

A lot of minor niggling details that just seemed to disrupt any natural flow.
Ped is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ped For This Useful Post:
Old 05-30-2013, 02:57 PM   #265
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Wow, I watched that risk is our business clip, and the female officer in red (disposable yeoman represent!), ended up playing the most annoying doctor ever on Next Generation for a year.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 09:54 PM   #266
I-Hate-Hulse
Franchise Player
 
I-Hate-Hulse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jammies View Post
That makes it even worse - so, presumably, this was a private project of Marcus'? That ship was, what, 8 times as big as Enterprise (2X as long, high, and wide) and he just used his expense account to build it and crew it? Where did he get the money, the materials, the construction crews? Or did Khan build the whole thing himself out of Lego blocks?
Quote:
Originally Posted by trackercowe View Post
Also those weren't officers on Marcus' ship, those were just private contractors and mercenaries. Scotty said as much when he ran into one in the escape hatch (which was a poorly written exchange mind you). So they likely knew of Marcus' plan, and were in on it all along. over our heads, but I'm glad they didn't end up bothering with Kirk's resurrection in the next movie.

You guys are clearly not DS9 fans. It's mentioned early on in the movie that Marcus is a part of Section 31. DS9 fans know that Section 31 is a semi-sanctioned black ops group of Starfleet that does whatever it wants, however it wants. It's well funded and just like the Special Ops line in the US budget, you could hide a bazillion latinum bars before anyone noticed. Marcus is one of many in Section 31, including I assume - the lackey blue shirts on the Dreadnought. Although it's entirely possible that Section 31 hired the Blackwater of the day...

It's this dude in DS9 that's Section 31. Clearly black leather = evil in Classic Trek.



Edit - S31 also appears in Enterprise - Malcom Reed was one of them I believe. But everyone was paying attention to Jolene Blalock and not much else I suspect....I know I was.

Last edited by I-Hate-Hulse; 05-30-2013 at 09:58 PM.
I-Hate-Hulse is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2013, 10:47 PM   #267
Yeah_Baby
Franchise Player
 
Yeah_Baby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: still in edmonton
Exp:
Default

I did like the Section 31 reference.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
Thats why Flames fans make ideal Star Trek fans. We've really been taught to embrace the self-loathing and extreme criticism.
Check out The Pod-Wraiths: A Star Trek Deep Space Nine Podcast
Yeah_Baby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2013, 10:45 AM   #268
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Just got back from the movie and loved it.

Thought Cumberbach was brilliant and the twist with him being Khan was awesome. I knew Khan was in it somehow, but I didn't expect that. I thought Harrison was working for him or something.

Loved the reversal with Spock screaming "Khhaaaaann!!' after Kirk died. I thought a lot of characters had some good defining moments. McCoy had some dandy one liners, and his gizmos around Kirks face are hilarious. Chekov saving the day was great after the blunder with the ship. I liked Scotty's stance against the weapons, "I thought we were explorers". Sulus message to Harrison was hilarious and awesome at the same time.

There were some great moments between Kirk and Spock, although I will admit, Pine's ability to cry on cue is almost Bruce Willis bad.

Overall I really enjoyed it and I think the great villain had a lot to do with it. As far as Star Trek vs Iron Man 3, I think Star Trek was way better. And I'm the biggest Iron Man fan I know. Not that I think Iron Man 3 is bad, just that Into Darkness was better.
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2013, 10:35 PM   #269
Brannigans Law
First Line Centre
 
Brannigans Law's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Calgary AB
Exp:
Default

I actually enjoyed the movie until about 20 mins left to go. I've never witnessed a movie go so badly so quickly. They had a chance to make this series their own and really put their own stamp and twist on things, but instead chose to do what they did. This movie had a compelling villain and a fairly decent storyline, but as so many movies do it just fell apart trying to spin an amazing ending.
Brannigans Law is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2013, 11:11 PM   #270
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Been listening to the soundtrack, the main theme sure has grown on me.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2013, 09:04 AM   #271
J pold
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

As the resident movie hater I have to stay I really enjoyed this film. The fact I had little to no knowledge of Star Trek going in probably let me enjoy the film more than devoted fans. All the small details that deviated from the main story line were wasted on me and I was just able to sit back and enjoy. The ending was a bit much and very rushed but 85% of the film was rock solid in my opinion. One of the best films I've seen this year.
J pold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2013, 09:05 AM   #272
Yeah_Baby
Franchise Player
 
Yeah_Baby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: still in edmonton
Exp:
Default

He's trolling us.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
Thats why Flames fans make ideal Star Trek fans. We've really been taught to embrace the self-loathing and extreme criticism.
Check out The Pod-Wraiths: A Star Trek Deep Space Nine Podcast
Yeah_Baby is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Yeah_Baby For This Useful Post:
Old 06-06-2013, 08:43 PM   #273
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”

Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2013, 10:07 AM   #274
LouCypher
Powerplay Quarterback
 
LouCypher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada!
Exp:
Default

Just saw it yesterday and it was maybe not quite the ride I wanted, more of a tries to hook you in and does but still struggles to keep you. Really neat elements like Kahn and Peter Wellers character both enhanced the intrigue. I think it still rates as better then many Star Trek films, was hoping it had the same feel as part 6 the undiscovered country, almost got there but not quite. If anything the visuals, everything from alien races to weapons to ships reminded me more of star wars, perhaps even more than the actual Star Wars prequels so bodes well for J.J.'s next project.
LouCypher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2013, 10:16 PM   #275
Hack&Lube
Atomic Nerd
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
I have no idea, if I ever know the answer to this puzzle I may just shoot myself.
I definitely heard hushed exclamations of "Praxis!" in the theatre when the exploded moon was shown.
Hack&Lube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2013, 11:12 PM   #276
Yeah_Baby
Franchise Player
 
Yeah_Baby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: still in edmonton
Exp:
Default

But it won't explode for like 30 more years!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
Thats why Flames fans make ideal Star Trek fans. We've really been taught to embrace the self-loathing and extreme criticism.
Check out The Pod-Wraiths: A Star Trek Deep Space Nine Podcast
Yeah_Baby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 08:19 AM   #277
Hack&Lube
Atomic Nerd
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeah_Baby View Post
But it won't explode for like 30 more years!
And Khan is a white dude with the last name Singh! Everything in this universe seems to be slightly different even before Nero arrived so people need to stop worrying about canon.

Last edited by Hack&Lube; 06-10-2013 at 08:23 AM.
Hack&Lube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2013, 10:21 AM   #278
GreenLantern
One of the Nine
 
GreenLantern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Space Sector 2814
Exp:
Default

Finally got to watch this movie last night, loved it.

Favourite part:

Spoiler!


Chris Pine is the best, he should have been GL...
__________________
"In brightest day, in blackest night / No evil shall escape my sight / Let those who worship evil's might / Beware my power, Green Lantern's light!"
GreenLantern is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:21 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy