Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist
What we need is equal sentencing for equal crimes. A non-indigenous offender gets significantly more severe justice whereas the Gladue Report guarantees much more leniency and alternative sentencing approaches.
In a not too dissimilar case in Langley a couple years ago a homeless man was sentences to 5 years for killing someone when an argument and altercation occurred. In that case the offender was found to have expressed remorse, had no criminal record and had a history of drug use. No offer of rehabilitation and betterment for that guy though.
|
Equal sentencing for equal crimes isn’t reality even outside of anything gladue related so I’m not sure why you’re pretending that’s your issue. Sentences for the same crimes differ widely based on the context of the crime and the history of the individual (regardless of race), which is why even when someone pleads guilty there will be one side arguing for a harsher punishment and another arguing for a more lenient one.
Is your preference that nobody be rehabilitated or given an opportunity for betterment? Or is your issue that everybody should be? in which case complaining about this sentencing seems bizarre.
The circumstances surrounding the killing and the accused were also factors that led to the sentencing in the Langley case, by the way, which is why the accused got a much lighter sentence than the prosecution was asking for, but also why it wasn’t nothing.
Manslaughter can carry a sentence of no jail time to life in prison. “Equal sentencing for equal crimes” makes you feel better though? Life for everyone?