Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-08-2015, 11:37 PM   #181
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

I think the takeaway from this thread is that you shouldn't allow yourself or your kids to ever get obese in the first place, as clearly losing weight and maintaining it afterwards becomes an uphill battle for life.

Cook your own meals. Involve your kids in the kitchen. Shop the outside perimeter of the grocery store. Buy quality, not quantity. Give your kids healthy snacks from the start. Take the stairs. Go on bike rides. Let your kids roam their neighbourhoods. Teach yourself (and your kids) good habits, and chances are you and them won't ever have to go through the same hell that a lot of obese people go through.

While I'm sure there are those who are doomed to be overweight from the start, most of the time when I see an obese person, I think to myself that somewhere along the way, a parent, and not biology, let them down.
Table 5 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Table 5 For This Useful Post:
Old 08-09-2015, 08:57 PM   #182
Bagor
Franchise Player
 
Bagor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Spartanville
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor View Post
The reason is based on science, as I linked to above. The longer you are obese, the less likely you are to ever succeed.
Where is the link?

Thor, you keep on harping on about science but I can't find any evidence, despite you being asked on more than one occasion by more than one poster, for you to present peer reviewed evidence, of you presenting any. Why?
__________________



Last edited by Bagor; 08-09-2015 at 09:15 PM.
Bagor is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bagor For This Useful Post:
Old 08-10-2015, 03:15 PM   #183
TorqueDog
Franchise Player
 
TorqueDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary - Centre West
Exp:
Default

^Because he doesn't have any.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor View Post
LOL this is a friend of mine!! Kris Gunnars actually considered me as a writer last year. But wow quoting what you said about that we should shame fat people, his response like any decent human being was that you are not worth listening to... The IRONY you would link to his website, awesome..
Uh, yeah... I linked to it because you originally posted it, and I was calling out what an awful article it was to use to try and discredit CICO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor View Post
You sir, are a joke.
Uh huh.

We agree on a great many things, Thor, particularly when it comes to religion and the future of our world (hopefully) without it. But you have been barking on in this thread about 'science science science' and haven't posted a damn thing to back up your claims, except continuing to parrot that the science is on your side. Your posts read like the content posted on /r/fatlogic.

As for which one of us is the joke... I'd say "don't make me laugh", but your conduct in this thread already has.
__________________
-James
GO
FLAMES GO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Typical dumb take.
TorqueDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2015, 04:10 PM   #184
TSXCman
First Line Centre
 
TSXCman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Exp:
Default

On a positive note... I've been biking to work for the past 2ish months (not terribly far but it gets my heart pumping), eating more vegetables per sitting than normal (I cook a lot already, just focusing on getting more veg in), checking my calorie balance with MyFitnessPal, and coincidentally drinking/partying a lot due to the stampede and a fun summer in general.

I dropped from 208lbs to 198lbs in a month and dropped 2 inches off my waistline. My progress has slowed, but my legs are definitely getting larger and firmer, so it's good mass coming back on.

I would like to get back to 180lbs, as I was this weight at my height from age 13 to 25. My healthy weight for me would still be considered obese, but it's a reasonable goal.
TSXCman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to TSXCman For This Useful Post:
Old 08-10-2015, 08:11 PM   #185
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

After spending the last few weeks in western BC it's pretty evident that people here aren't as fat as Albertans. Just like Texas in the U.S. Oil money and obesity go hand in hand.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2015, 08:24 PM   #186
Wormius
Franchise Player
 
Wormius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
Exp:
Default

I guess from my own experience in losing some weight - if I was going to be somewhat sedentary, I didn't need to eat as much.

Once at a healthy weight, I felt more interest in going to the gym, buying some nicer clothes, etc.
Wormius is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Wormius For This Useful Post:
Old 08-11-2015, 07:45 AM   #187
Regorium
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor View Post
Odd that you would call me arrogant and irritating, considering the insulting comments made against obese people in this thread, and in general. Fat shaming is the last great politically correct insult that most people have no issue with making.
I'm shocked you still believe this. Victim complex much? Consider that there's basically a 50/50 split in opinion even in this thread, it doesn't seem very politically correct to me.

I can immediately think of three insults that are still politically correct - in the way that NOBODY would stand up for the insulted. I could start a thread about it, and it'd get maybe 10 responses because noone would care. That is the meaning of politically correct insults.
Regorium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 09:28 AM   #188
TorqueDog
Franchise Player
 
TorqueDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary - Centre West
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
After spending the last few weeks in western BC it's pretty evident that people here aren't as fat as Albertans. Just like Texas in the U.S. Oil money and obesity go hand in hand.
I'm not so sure it's that clear cut. If there's one thing I do notice, it's that more affluent people, whether it's in O&G, financial institutions, name your enterprise... tend to be in better shape than the people who report to them. Directors, executive VPs, C-levels... I mean there's obvious exceptions, but I see a ton of these people who are routinely going to the gym, or in pretty commendable shape.

So is it having the money, or chasing the money that influences it? Longer hours, less desire to waste time making a meal or finding the healthier option? It's not about cost, because we know full well that eating healthy is no more expensive than eating garbage.

One thing you could also observe about people in BC is that they're seemingly a lot more relaxed. I think there's an interesting correlation there.
__________________
-James
GO
FLAMES GO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Typical dumb take.
TorqueDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 09:39 AM   #189
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
After spending the last few weeks in western BC it's pretty evident that people here aren't as fat as Albertans. Just like Texas in the U.S. Oil money and obesity go hand in hand.
Nonsense. There are mountains of data showing a correlation between poverty and obesity. The rankings of obesity by U.S. state is almost a perfect inversion of the rankings of states by median income. There are far more obese people in Mississippi and Arkansas than in New York and Colorado.

You don't need lots of money to eat lots of crappy food and avoid exercise. But the more educated people are, the healthier they're likely to eat and the more they're likely to exercise.

I'd guess the high rates (by Canadian standards) of obesity in Alberta correlate to having lots of people in high-obesity demographics: people who grew up in a rural environment (or are one generation removed), and 35-55 year old men - both groups who, not coincidentally, make up a large proportion of the people who move here for work.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.

Last edited by CliffFletcher; 08-11-2015 at 09:43 AM.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 09:44 AM   #190
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TorqueDog View Post
So is it having the money, or chasing the money that influences it? Longer hours, less desire to waste time making a meal or finding the healthier option? It's not about cost, because we know full well that eating healthy is no more expensive than eating garbage.
I think that would have more to do with the general personality traits of someone who makes it to high-level corporate positions. They are generally very driven in all walks of life, not just for money.

That said, I see a lot of executives on a daily basis and they really do come in all shapes and sizes. Not sure I see any correlation with health at all. Some of them are in some of the worst shape I've seen.

Might have more to do with how people deal with stress. Some people exercise, some people eat, some people read, some people smoke, some people drink, etc... So I would say that whatever this vice tends to be, its very visible for people who deal with a lot of stress.
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 09:50 AM   #191
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Again, we don't have to guess about this stuff or rely on anecdote. There is loads of empirical evidence showing clear demographic correlations to obesity.

The less educated are more likely to obese the than the more educated.

The rural are more likely to be obese than the urban.

The poor are more likely to be obese than the affluent.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2015, 12:22 PM   #192
TorqueDog
Franchise Player
 
TorqueDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary - Centre West
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
Again, we don't have to guess about this stuff or rely on anecdote. There is loads of empirical evidence showing clear demographic correlations to obesity.

The less educated are more likely to obese the than the more educated.

The rural are more likely to be obese than the urban.

The poor are more likely to be obese than the affluent.
Are the poor less likely to be well educated than the affluent? That's a resounding yes.

If the poor and the less educated are both demographics more likely to fall prey to obesity, then they're in tough if they happen to straddle both poor and uneducated / less educated.

So the thing I keep coming back to - education. It needs to be better on the subject of what and how people need to eat.
__________________
-James
GO
FLAMES GO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Typical dumb take.
TorqueDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:26 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy