Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-19-2014, 07:37 PM   #181
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
Or maybe its just the pre-draft hype building up to give you that impression. This has been considered a mediocre draft for a couple of years and doesn't appear to have improved. The bloggers are doing a great job building up hype over players that a year ago few had heard of. I think the reason you believe there are as many as 5 elite players in this draft is because of the repetition factor. Time will tell how good this draft is, but it is unlikely you get 5 elite talents out of this draft. Hopefully for the Flames, drafting at #4, your projection is right.
My comment that you quoted was referring to next year's draft.

Another poster was suggesting we use next year's pick to get a quality player because we won't get McDavid anyway. I was suggesting that there is far more than just one player in that draft
Enoch Root is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2014, 08:17 PM   #182
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
To get anywhere near a spot where Columbus wouldn't match you'd have to be up in the 2015 1st, 2nd, 3rd round pick plus 2106 1st or four straight first round picks.

Its not just going to take the one first rounder to get these guys.
match what, I never said to offer sheet anyone. I would consider trading the pick. If you wouldn't thats fine
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2014, 08:23 PM   #183
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fonz View Post
.....the Flames could improve and finish 7th last next season, and the odds of getting the #1 is 4.7%.

Teams worse than us next year:
- Buffalo
- Edmonton
- Carolina

I think we finish next season right around where we finished this year, 4th. That gives us a 10.7% chance at #1, and finishing bottom 3 would not surprise me at all.
they could finish above 7, they could make the playoffs, all these things factor into the odds. I'm good with my 2% chance number. Remember in my scenario the team is adding a big time player after trading the pick and I am also assuming Burke is going to add some other talent. The Flames aren't the kind of organization that is just gonna concede to sucking for a few years for draft picks they are going to do what they can to improve the team.

all I'm saying is I would see whats out there

Last edited by dino7c; 04-19-2014 at 08:26 PM.
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2014, 08:26 PM   #184
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

what big time player would you suggest?
Enoch Root is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2014, 08:57 PM   #185
JohnnyHockey
Backup Goalie
 
JohnnyHockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Wouldn't mind seeing a guy like Andrej Meszaros.


JohnnyHockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2014, 09:13 PM   #186
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enoch root View Post
what big time player would you suggest?
ror
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 04-19-2014, 09:27 PM   #187
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
My comment that you quoted was referring to next year's draft.

Another poster was suggesting we use next year's pick to get a quality player because we won't get McDavid anyway. I was suggesting that there is far more than just one player in that draft
That makes more sense then. Carry on!
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2014, 06:33 AM   #188
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Flames Fan View Post
I'm really not sold on Setoguchi. He's really regressed since leaving San Jose, mostly defensively, and has problems with work ethic. He scores goals, but does little else. Reminds me too much of Glencross and we already have one of those at an assumedly better price.
Seoguchi was a Huge disappointment on the Jets. Why would he do better in the Stempniak role (filler on the top 6) on the Flames. He played that role on the Jets.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2014, 06:36 AM   #189
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Where is all the love gone for Stempniak?

A lot of folks wanted him when we had him but now that he is gone getting him back is not a good idea?
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2014, 07:38 AM   #190
really?
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snipetype View Post
NOBODY! Let the young guys play
Hopefully the way management sees it. People have suggested Matt Greene. That would be a wise move, but bringing in forwards on anything more than a one or two year deal would be detrimental. Guys like Reinhart, Granlund and Baertschi will be ready for full time NHL duty with a good offseason. Gaudreau, Knight, Poirier and maybe even the first round pick may push for big club minutes next year, and within 2-3 years guys like Arnold and Klimchuk may be ready for some roll with the team. This offseason is the wrong time to commit to long term deals up front. Once Glencross and Jones are gone and the organization has a better read on the futures of the current young guys, then they might want to look at a more significant acquisition.
really? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2014, 08:32 AM   #191
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The problem with letting the young guys play is that we have to hit the cap floor. Unless we give Westgarth a 1 year 10 million dollar contract, we will have to spend the money somewhere.

Whether that's subbing a higher paid guy in for a guy like Butler, or getting a direct replacement for Cammy with another Cammy priced player, who knows.

we'll have to get someone though. We can't not hit the floor.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2014, 08:42 AM   #192
Critter4223
Farm Team Player
 
Critter4223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfman View Post
I don't know about everybody else, but...I want to be in the playoffs next year. This hoping for McDavid or Eichel is a joke. With last years and this years draft we are in a better position prospect wise. I'm sick of not being in the playoffs.

Not being in the playoffs sucks, but not being realistic and seeing that this team is still miles away from being a cup contender is dangerous. You can sign some mid end talent in ufa's, hope for career years by 6-8 guys again, trade away a couple 1st round picks for players, and make the playoffs for a couple years and be right back where we were 2 yrs ago. Best bet is rebuild right get your high picks hopefully end up with one or two franchise players and develop all you prospects correctly. Then you'll have a team ready to contend for a decade not one that makes the playoffs here and there
__________________
Using Tapatalk
Critter4223 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Critter4223 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-20-2014, 08:56 AM   #193
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

There is almost no way the Flames will make the playoffs next year.

Gaudreau would have to win the Calder, Sven would have to put everything together, Poirier would have to be the runner up for the Calder, and #4 would have to have a Monahan like season. That's in addition to some signings and free agents. We only have 2 top six forwards next year (Hudler and Monahan). We need to have 5+ to make the playoffs.

We are likely 2 years away from the playoffs at the best scenario, and not a contender for 3 or 4.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Caged Great For This Useful Post:
Old 04-20-2014, 09:36 AM   #194
$ven27
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Halifax
Exp:
Default

And that's being generous. A lot of things will have to go right to be a contender within 3-4 years.
$ven27 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to $ven27 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-20-2014, 09:56 AM   #195
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
We only have 2 top six forwards next year (Hudler and Monahan). We need to have 5+ to make the playoffs.
And that's being very generous regarding Monahan.
I have no doubt he will be a great top six, and there is also no doubt he's got a long way to go to be that right now.
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2014, 03:11 PM   #196
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

A part of me would like to see the Flames take a run at Callahan. We've got the cap space. He adds toughness, leadership and a little offense to the top six. Even at $6M over 5 years, I think we'd see value from that deal.

Not super married to the idea by any stretch, but it'd send a good message to the rest of the league.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”

Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
GreenLantern2814 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2014, 03:32 PM   #197
The Fonz
Our Jessica Fletcher
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

I'd be okay with giving Callahan 6.5m per year, but would have to be shorter term. 3 years.

I don't think he takes that term though.
The Fonz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2014, 04:28 PM   #198
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
Or maybe its just the pre-draft hype building up to give you that impression. This has been considered a mediocre draft for a couple of years and doesn't appear to have improved. The bloggers are doing a great job building up hype over players that a year ago few had heard of. I think the reason you believe there are as many as 5 elite players in this draft is because of the repetition factor. Time will tell how good this draft is, but it is unlikely you get 5 elite talents out of this draft. Hopefully for the Flames, drafting at #4, your projection is right.
A mediocre draft doesn't necessarily mean that the top end is crappy. It can mean that the depth drops off rapidly and the players in the 11-30 range are much worse than in deeper years.

The top end looks decent in this draft. No generational talents or superstars but there looks to be 1st line talent for sure.
Flames Draft Watcher is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2014, 04:32 PM   #199
The Fonz
Our Jessica Fletcher
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

We gotta get that Niskanen.
The Fonz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2014, 04:41 PM   #200
TheDebaser
Powerplay Quarterback
 
TheDebaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

I'll just add that Gaudreau is a top-6 talent today. I think if he can play as well as he did in his first nhl game, he can only get better next year with more coaching and some time to work on fitness. Just going off of that game in Vancouver, Gaudreau will be a force in our top 6 next year.

Add Glencross (when he shows up) and Backlund too and suddenly we have 5 2nd line players on our team.

Backlund and Ramo seem to think that this team has a shot at the playoffs. I wouldn't put money on it, but you know what? I don't think I'd bet against them either.
__________________
Always Earned, Never Given
TheDebaser is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TheDebaser For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:11 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy