Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-23-2026, 02:56 PM   #61
Wormius
Franchise Player
 
Wormius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
Exp:
Default

Is it possible to collapse the landing gear in that kind of situation and hope it slows down the plane enough to stop in time or would that make it slide even further along the runway?
Wormius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2026, 03:08 PM   #62
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Threads like this make me really appreciative of CP as a place of discussion, where we have some really knowledge posters with some educated insight on the topic. Thanks Acey, btimbit and others for the perspective. Very hard to watch, can’t imagine what a terrifying experience that would be, and so tragic for the people working there and the family members of the deceased.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Old 03-23-2026, 03:08 PM   #63
speede5
First Line Centre
 
speede5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius View Post
Is it possible to collapse the landing gear in that kind of situation and hope it slows down the plane enough to stop in time or would that make it slide even further along the runway?
That is in a few emergency procedures in some aircraft, but you lose directional control and, I've seen this, they slide a lot further than you would think. I don't know if it's possible or advised in a commercial jet.
speede5 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to speede5 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-23-2026, 03:15 PM   #64
Acey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Not possible and yeah it'd be a real gamble as you'd lose the ability to steer. Also the fuel is all in the wings, about 7,500 lbs on each side. It's in your best interest to keep those from sliding directly against the pavement at 100 mph
Acey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Acey For This Useful Post:
Old 03-23-2026, 03:19 PM   #65
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Acey View Post
This is probably the most accurate analogy I've seen so far. These are relatively small jets that are very low to the ground. It's basically an extended private jet repurposed as an airliner. "Tank" is the only reasonable way to describe these fire trucks... they are solid as hell.

It's an airplane designed to be as light as possible vs a fire truck designed to be as sturdy as possible, it's no surprise who won the collision.
And its dark and its raining the tarmac is likely very slippery...its just a parade of crappy circumstances.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Locke For This Useful Post:
Old 03-23-2026, 03:26 PM   #66
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

I honestly feel bad most for the air traffic controller. We don't know his back story but he seems like a guy who right away struggled with what occurred.
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bluejays For This Useful Post:
Old 03-23-2026, 03:26 PM   #67
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius View Post
Is it possible to collapse the landing gear in that kind of situation and hope it slows down the plane enough to stop in time or would that make it slide even further along the runway?
Not an expert, but I've seen a fair number of videos of planes crashing on runways. I can't imagine that doing anything that destabilizes the plane would be a good idea. At those speeds, with a fragile plane filled with fuel, anything that could result in a wing, for example, hitting the tarmac seems like an awful idea.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2026, 03:45 PM   #68
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius View Post
Is it possible to collapse the landing gear in that kind of situation and hope it slows down the plane enough to stop in time or would that make it slide even further along the runway?
Never flown it, I think the CRJ has an override that would allow it in theory, but to my knowledge no pilot would be trained for that. I'd say you're still better off with hard braking than an uncontrolled slide. Likely dip a wing and start rolling at 100kts
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post:
Old 03-23-2026, 03:55 PM   #69
chummer
Franchise Player
 
chummer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David View Post
I was thinking that, too. The passenger in the truck would have the best visibility. Would it be their responsibility to do the visual check? Swiss cheese effect?
I drove those crash trucks at YYC for years with CFD before it went private. Most of the trucks it's just the driver however the lead truck usually has the Captain and a driver, I'm assuming that's the case here. But neither obviously looked, you have to be so sure, especially at night. That truck probably weighed about 70,000 pounds
chummer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to chummer For This Useful Post:
Old 03-23-2026, 04:05 PM   #70
chemgear
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

chemgear is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to chemgear For This Useful Post:
Old 03-23-2026, 04:20 PM   #71
chemgear
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

chemgear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2026, 04:21 PM   #72
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ped View Post
Keep in mind that at 167 km an hour that even if a passenger in the truck saw it, it was likely far too late to react
I can imagine how even in ideal conditions it might be much harder to see a plane that has already touched down than one coming in on approach. I wonder if a better procedure would be a 10 or 15 second stop before crossing an active runway, which would give enough time for a plane in the 'blindspot' to clear, or for a plane on approach to be unmissable...
__________________
The UCP are trampling on our rights and freedoms. Donate $200 to Alberta NDP and get $150 back on your taxes
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2026, 04:24 PM   #73
DoubleK
Franchise Player
 
DoubleK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA/Scottsdale, AZ
Exp:
Default

That poor flight attendant.
__________________
It's only game. Why you heff to be mad?
DoubleK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2026, 04:28 PM   #74
fotze2
electric boogaloo
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Exp:
Default

That video definitely explains it. God I feel for the guy who said he messed up. I could do that multiple times a day. This will be a safety meeting video very soon for us.
__________________
I am Edgelord!! Woohoo.
fotze2 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to fotze2 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-23-2026, 04:43 PM   #75
chemgear
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

I think they had an incorrect graphic showing the plane turning on the tarmac but still.

"The system set him up for failure."

EDIT: As there is more information coming out, I'm just surprised that there wasn't more fatalities. It could have been so much worse. The fact that there was a collision between a plane and that vehicle but didn't hit the wings, the fuel and all without any kind of fire.


Last edited by chemgear; 03-23-2026 at 05:37 PM.
chemgear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2026, 04:45 PM   #76
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleK View Post
That poor flight attendant.
Extremely fortunate to survive.


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...rash-laguardia
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
Old 03-23-2026, 04:52 PM   #77
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius View Post
Is it possible to collapse the landing gear in that kind of situation and hope it slows down the plane enough to stop in time or would that make it slide even further along the runway?
That would have also made the impact more direct. The plane was above the truck a bit at least, which may have helped avoid even more injuries.
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2026, 05:04 PM   #78
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Exp:
Default

Just read something that confirmed a thought I had earlier, but the one controller was handling both ground and tower.

Even at that time of day, for LGA that's just insane to me. Normal, but insane.

(It's probably mentioned in one of those videos but I haven't watched them yet. Not a fan of Captain Steeeve)

Edit: Confirmation may have been erroneous, US transport secretary saying earlier reporting false

Last edited by btimbit; 03-23-2026 at 08:02 PM.
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post:
Old 03-23-2026, 05:25 PM   #79
DownInFlames
Craig McTavish' Merkin
 
DownInFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by btimbit View Post
Just read something that confirmed a thought I had earlier, but the one controller was handling both ground and tower.

Even at that time of day, for LGA that's just insane to me. Normal, but insane.

(It's probably mentioned in one of those videos but I haven't watched them yet. Not a fan of Captain Steeeve)

Captain Steeeeeve likes to make proclamations without facts, and ends up wrong. I'm a layman and even I can see he's unreliable.
DownInFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DownInFlames For This Useful Post:
Old 03-23-2026, 05:31 PM   #80
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DownInFlames View Post
Captain Steeeeeve likes to make proclamations without facts, and ends up wrong. I'm a layman and even I can see he's unreliable.
Exactly my complaints with him. He's always in a rush to be the first to have a video on a topic, facts be dammed. The the good ones just say "This is horrible, this is what happened, my heart goes out to those involved, I won't speculate, I'll have an opinion when the reports start coming out"
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:42 AM.

Calgary Flames
2025-26






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy