Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-07-2026, 08:08 AM   #341
stemit14
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Would be wild for the flams to draft the Ruck twins. They could recreate this line at the prospect tournament.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 08:13 AM   #342
fotze2
electric boogaloo
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14 View Post
Would be wild for the flams to draft the Ruck twins. They could recreate this line at the prospect tournament.
What will Reggie dunlop calls the rucks eventually. A list:

Ruckfaces
We will Ruck You - lame
Ruck me in the goat-ss.
Sir Rucks Alot
Holy Ruck!

I think we would have to change fata for the f word to Ruck.

This is some edgelord stuff I just posted.
__________________
I am an Edgelord!! Woohoo.
fotze2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 08:31 AM   #343
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Canucks media is already pushing for the B.C. born Rucks.

Conroy might have to trade down AND trade up and grab them in the early teens.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 08:34 AM   #344
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Could the Flames snag the Ruck twins with their own and the Rangers 2nds? Or will they need to trade back into the 1st and pick them in that round? I guess it depends on what happens in the WHL playoffs?
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 08:35 AM   #345
BigThief
First Line Centre
 
BigThief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze2 View Post

This is some edgelord stuff I just posted.
lol that really stuck with you eh?
BigThief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 08:36 AM   #346
Monahammer
Franchise Player
 
Monahammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

I think we will probably need at least Vegas 1st on a ruck at this point. Then maybe no one takes the other one and we use the earliest 2nd on the other, or we use a combo of 2nds/another prospect/roster player to grab the adjacent 1st.
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Monahammer For This Useful Post:
Old 03-07-2026, 08:44 AM   #347
FanSince'01
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 868904 View Post
Canucks media is already pushing for the B.C. born Rucks.

Conroy might have to trade down AND trade up and grab them in the early teens.
Good thing is that if the Canucks really want them and they’re rising enough to be mid-first round picks, we currently have the advantage over them in terms of both the position of our additional first rounder plus all of our additional second rounders.

If our Vancouver really wants them, they’re in a tougher position to be able to do it than we are as things stand now. I haven’t looked at every team’s draft picks in round 1 and 2 but I imagine we’re one of the better positioned teams to be able to draft both of them.
FanSince'01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 08:47 AM   #348
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 868904 View Post
Canucks media is already pushing for the B.C. born Rucks.

Conroy might have to trade down AND trade up and grab them in the early teens.
As it stands right now, not discounting for OTT:

VAN: 1, 27, 33, 43, 95
CGY: 2, 19, 34, 36, 48, 51, 65, 66, 96

The Flames would get first crack, with the #19 pick, and then have much more trade capital with which to be able to make the 2nd pick.

#34 + #36 probably gets you a pick in the 20-23 range.

If the Flames want the Rucks, #19 + #23 gets it done, IMO
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 03-07-2026, 10:17 AM   #349
robertsfanatic
Powerplay Quarterback
 
robertsfanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Toronto, ON
Exp:
Default

as much as i love this idea of the Rucks, i'd rather risk it with the 34 and 36 picks.
__________________
*Disclaimer: I am a "glass half full" Flames fan.
robertsfanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to robertsfanatic For This Useful Post:
Old 03-07-2026, 10:26 AM   #350
Calgary Highlander
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

I'm assuming they will want to play together (down the road) if they are drafted apart.

So if you get one, you've got pretty good odds at getting the other one at some point in their careers.
Calgary Highlander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 10:34 AM   #351
jg13
Franchise Player
 
jg13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Never has a draft eligible player that lead the CHL in scoring gone in the second round. Both players will go in round 1
jg13 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jg13 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-07-2026, 10:46 AM   #352
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze2 View Post
What will Reggie dunlop calls the rucks eventually. A list:

Ruckfaces
We will Ruck You - lame
Ruck me in the goat-ss.
Sir Rucks Alot
Holy Ruck!

I think we would have to change fata for the f word to Ruck.

This is some edgelord stuff I just posted.
Liamarkus
__________________
Edmonton is No Good.
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Reggie Dunlop For This Useful Post:
Old 03-07-2026, 10:49 AM   #353
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jg13 View Post
Never has a draft eligible player that lead the CHL in scoring gone in the second round. Both players will go in round 1
Anything is possible but I would be pretty surprised if Markus goes in the 1st round.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 03-07-2026, 10:51 AM   #354
The EBUG's EBUG
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Oct 2025
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
As it stands right now, not discounting for OTT:

VAN: 1, 27, 33, 43, 95
CGY: 2, 19, 34, 36, 48, 51, 65, 66, 96

The Flames would get first crack, with the #19 pick, and then have much more trade capital with which to be able to make the 2nd pick.

#34 + #36 probably gets you a pick in the 20-23 range.

If the Flames want the Rucks, #19 + #23 gets it done, IMO
Going to be really interesting to see what happens with this, I'm very selfish but would be really cool to see them get really aggressive and try and end up with 4 picks in the first round this year.

Say you got your top 5, wherever that lands, then Vegas comes in high teens or early 20s, BPA again.

If they're confident the Rucks end up in that mid to late 20s range and those are their guys, given the high seconds this year and multiple firsts the next two years they'd be in a good position to move up into the 25,26 range by dealing 34 and a later pick and one of the 1sts the next two years to get up there.

Would be pretty electric seeing Friday night of the draft end with:

McKenna
Hurlbert
Ruck
Ruck
The EBUG's EBUG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 10:57 AM   #355
Roughneck
#1 Goaltender
 
Roughneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the middle
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jg13 View Post
Never has a draft eligible player that lead the CHL in scoring gone in the second round. Both players will go in round 1

Ramzi Abid in 1998
Corey Locke in 2003 (though it's true he didn't go in the 2nd Round)
Conor Garland in 2015 (also didn't go in the 2nd Round)
Roughneck is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Roughneck For This Useful Post:
Old 03-07-2026, 11:15 AM   #356
bob-loblaw
First Line Centre
 
bob-loblaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Probably an obvious thought here, but the Rucks are so good because they have been playing together for so long. Who knows what you'd wind up with if you split them up. They have to go to the same team. I don't think two teams would draft only one knowing they can't get the other. I wouldn't be surprised if Conroy has been annoying another GM's about trading picks to get them, and he has enough picls to make it happen.
bob-loblaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 11:30 AM   #357
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Other GMs will also be aware of Conroy's eagerness and may well extract a premium. How much are they worth?
__________________
Edmonton is No Good.
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Reggie Dunlop For This Useful Post:
Old 03-07-2026, 11:35 AM   #358
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bob-loblaw View Post
Probably an obvious thought here, but the Rucks are so good because they have been playing together for so long. Who knows what you'd wind up with if you split them up. They have to go to the same team. I don't think two teams would draft only one knowing they can't get the other. I wouldn't be surprised if Conroy has been annoying another GM's about trading picks to get them, and he has enough picls to make it happen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop View Post
Other GMs will also be aware of Conroy's eagerness and may well extract a premium. How much are they worth?
Just to be clear, Conroy has never given the slightest indication of an interest in these guys, right? This is just CP fantasizing (no judgment).
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 11:46 AM   #359
FanSince'01
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Just to be clear, Conroy has never given the slightest indication of an interest in these guys, right? This is just CP fantasizing (no judgment).
I think you're correct that there's never been any official indication of interest in them from Connie or our scouting dept. But with Basha now playing on their line and with them producing the way they are, you'd figure that they're certainly on our radar.

I think it'd also be unusual at this stage of the game to voice interest in a certain prospect, as usually teams try to keep their intentions hidden as much as possible.
FanSince'01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 07:05 PM   #360
shutout
First Line Centre
 
shutout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Exp:
Default

Comes back to the premium that they are worth together>

1 - If they go go together to the same team are they worth 2.2-2.5 players because of their connection?

2 - If one does not work out do the both suffer from it?

3 - Are they more entitled together than just taking one of them?

4 - Are there two better players available that you don't need to spend the resources on like you would need to in order to get both twins?
__________________
The Time Goes & We Go With The Time - Grandpa
shutout is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to shutout For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:05 AM.

Calgary Flames
2025-26






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy