Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-03-2026, 10:16 PM   #30121
Flames67
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Exp:
Default

Putting my faith in GMCC and our insiders that we’re going to walk away with more picks and prospects we should get excited about by Friday.

And as always, Edmonton is no good
Flames67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2026, 10:16 PM   #30122
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

RH dmen are always coveted, it's just weirdly a spot the Flames have depth
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2026, 10:16 PM   #30123
cam_calderon
Powerplay Quarterback
 
cam_calderon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty81 View Post
But this week is basically the last bit of excitement we will have as flames fans until the lottery.. the flames talking heads proactively dampening any enthusiasm and telling the fans we will have 1 or 2 deals tops before we are even at deadline day is just brutal stuff for an already suffering fanbase. Maybe thats just being realistic but it would be a massive disappointment with where the team it at.
It's all hypothetical unless you're patched into Craig's five burner phones and know exactly what's on the table. Last I checked we have no UFAs of note, we don't need a panic trade like Kadri for a 3rd or something along those lines.

Personally I'd be disappointed if Dreger was correct and there was actually a great deal for Kadri that was nixed by Edwards, but can also understand him not willing to retain up to 10 million on Nazem.
__________________
Matthew Tkachuk apologist.
cam_calderon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2026, 10:16 PM   #30124
Sofa GM
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Maybe the rebiggle is still on…..
Sofa GM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sofa GM For This Useful Post:
Old 03-03-2026, 10:17 PM   #30125
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by traptor View Post
Sellers have gotten good value so far.
Yeah this narrative of a 'buyers market' hasn't actually been connected to any reality that we've seen play out.
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 03-03-2026, 10:17 PM   #30126
Macindoc
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cam_calderon View Post
How else are they going to indoctrinate kids into a life of miserable gambling addiction?
Exactly why I hate it. Just say how many trades you think they will make. Even “one or two” is acceptable, not “the over/under is 1.5”. Pro sports are so addicted to the revenue from gambling advertising, it’s maddening.
Macindoc is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Macindoc For This Useful Post:
Old 03-03-2026, 10:17 PM   #30127
Roko
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Exp:
Default

I think a flames trade happens tonight. Feels like the team knows
Roko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2026, 10:18 PM   #30128
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhett44 View Post
Nobody is glooming
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
There are several people glooming.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhett44 View Post
Eric Francis just ruined the entire day.
Had to laugh
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Old 03-03-2026, 10:19 PM   #30129
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

I think you're reading into things.

It's a blowout, that's it.
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2026, 10:19 PM   #30130
Macindoc
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhett44 View Post
Do you expect both Kadri and Coleman to be moved from what you are hearing? I thought the rumor was the market was hot for both.
Probably a market for both… with retention.
Macindoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2026, 10:22 PM   #30131
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macindoc View Post
Probably a market for both… with retention.
So just one gets traded then.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2026, 10:22 PM   #30132
Gugstanley
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Somewhere in Utah
Exp:
Default

The Flames contracts aren't so bad that every deal needs retention. Players can be moved both ways to make contracts match.
Gugstanley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Gugstanley For This Useful Post:
Old 03-03-2026, 10:23 PM   #30133
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macindoc View Post
Exactly why I hate it. Just say how many trades you think they will make. Even “one or two” is acceptable, not “the over/under is 1.5”. Pro sports are so addicted to the revenue from gambling advertising, it’s maddening.
It reminds me of Damon Runyon's stories about horse players and small-time crooks, where everything was expressed in terms of gambling odds. There was one story where a doctor wrote on a patient's chart, ‘10, 40, 100.’ He meant that the odds were 10 to 1 the guy didn't last a week, 40 to 1 he never recovered, and 100 to 1 that if he did recover, he would never be the same again.

It's good for a laugh in fiction, but highly annoying in real life. I don't want a doctor or a sports reporter who talks in those terms; though if I have to have one or the other, I'm glad it's not the doctor.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.

‘You see in Calgary, [Ryan] Huska is no joke. It’s good. He’s really set on a specific model defensively. If you can be reliable, you have the freedom to play offence.’
—Ethan Wyttenbach
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2026, 10:24 PM   #30134
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gugstanley View Post
The Flames contracts aren't so bad that every deal needs retention. Players can be moved both ways to make contracts match.
You'd think so, right?

Every team these days has some "roster fat" that they'd like to shed. Don't know why retention is a must.
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TrentCrimmIndependent For This Useful Post:
Old 03-03-2026, 10:24 PM   #30135
Macindoc
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
So just one gets traded then.
I’m thinking one now (likely Coleman) and one at the draft. But I know nothing.
Macindoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2026, 10:25 PM   #30136
Matty81
Franchise Player
 
Matty81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

If just one of the two forwards need to go so you can maximize the return that makes sense to wait for the retention slot. I'm increasingly hoping its Kadri who gets moved. I think the return will be better and in an absolute worst case scenario coleman is worth a 2nd at the deadline next year whereas a bad year for kadri could mean he has a negative value contract. Feels like more to lose. And I dont think coleman is gonna hurt the draft slot much
Matty81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2026, 10:34 PM   #30137
Sec214
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhett44 View Post
Do you expect both Kadri and Coleman to be moved from what you are hearing? I thought the rumor was the market was hot for both.
it’s possible if Calgary is willing to take a slight discount. Retention is all but required for Naz and few contenders want Blake with retention some might make the space required but times ticking…Ultimately it’s going to come down to the best offer for either player come Thursday/Friday.

Do I see a world where both are moved…Yes but Calgary is going to have to eat something bad or take an offer less than ideal. One retention spot is well a pain to say the least.

I think Coleman is more desired league wide, while I think Naz has more desire to move on.

I expect to see Calgary weaponize the cap space abit based on my conversations today. 44 Million in cap space. A couple Names I’ve heard are Bjorkstrand, Laine.

Lomberg, Pachal, Hanley, Mack’s name continue to be out there.
__________________
Sec214 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2026, 10:35 PM   #30138
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

I don't have really anything to add that hasn't really been said. I do disagree with FS in that I do believe Kadri will move by the deadline this year. Colorado would love to add him but need retention which the Flames are open to doing but only for more than the Avs are willing to pony up. I still think Detroit is where he ends up. They desperately need a #2 C, they have the cap and the assets, and a bonus for Kadri is Detroit is only a 2 hour drive from London. Minnesota is another possibility but hard to make the cap work there as well.

Coleman is definitely gonna go and I think we are going to get a great return because pretty much every playoff team has sniffed around him. The smart money is on TB but I could see Dallas making a push to bring him home too. Seriously, if I made my own trade board I would have Coleman as the most sought after player.

An interesting tidbit I was also told was that Colorado really tried to push for Backlund, they actually prefer Backlund over Kadri. I have no information on if the Flames even approached Backlund about it but I imagine Conroy would have mentioned it, it's a chance to chase a Cup but given how entrenched Backlund is in the community and the organization I imagine he wants to stay. I wonder what a Backlund return would be though. He has earned the right to stay and we need leadership for the young players though.

Pachal and Hanley could both go at the deadline as depth pieces for teams. I am starting to think it might be a quiet deadline due to the new CBA rules. It's a lot harder to make money work for a lot of teams. Anyhow as I said not a lot to share and I have been a bit out of the loop so I'm glad we have other great posters here who have info to share.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2026, 10:35 PM   #30139
Tbull8
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sec214 View Post
it’s possible if Calgary is willing to take a slight discount. Retention is all but required for Naz and few contenders want Blake with retention some might make the space required but times ticking…Ultimately it’s going to come down to the best offer for either player come Thursday/Friday.

Do I see a world where both are moved…Yes but Calgary is going to have to eat something bad or take an offer less than ideal. One retention spot is well a pain to say the least.

I think Coleman is more desired league wide, while I think Naz has more desire to move on.

I expect to see Calgary weaponize the cap space abit based on my conversations today. 44 Million in cap space. A couple Names I’ve heard are Bjorkstrand, Laine.

Lomberg, Pachal, Hanley, Mack’s name continue to be out there.
Just make it Bjorkstrand and Oreilly for Coleman and call it a day
Tbull8 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tbull8 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-03-2026, 10:38 PM   #30140
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbull8 View Post
Just make it Bjorkstrand and Oreilly for Coleman and call it a day
Add a pick on the Lighting side for taking Bjorkstrand and it makes sense.

Could probably flip Bjorkstrand to a playoff team with lots of cap room too.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:21 AM.

Calgary Flames
2025-26






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy