Most of the files pertaining to underage girls had the perps names redacted by Trump's DOJ (or still weren't released at all). Andrew must have pissed off the wrong people because they did less to protect him.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
Last edited by FlamesAddiction; 03-02-2026 at 12:53 PM.
Although I'm aware there's a lot circumstantial evidence and that lots of sketchy redactions have been made, is there any actual evidence, so far, linking Trump to specific activities?
If any redactions implicate Trump, that would seem like an even bigger violation that the activity itself. The Commander in Chief, purposely destroying or hiding evidence seems like a major violation of the judicial process.
Although I'm aware there's a lot circumstantial evidence and that lots of sketchy redactions have been made, is there any actual evidence, so far, linking Trump to specific activities?
If any redactions implicate Trump, that would seem like an even bigger violation that the activity itself. The Commander in Chief, purposely destroying or hiding evidence seems like a major violation of the judicial process.
I can only assume you have just travelled here from 2023. Let me fill you in. None of that matters anymore. It happens 100 times a day now. Hell, not releasing what they said they would release is a major violation, ignoring a judge's orders.
If you had regular contact with him at all, you should be investigated or questioned at the very least. If that contact persisted after his original conviction, investigation should be mandatory.
He was a fraudulent financier of criminals and trafficked children. These were the only reasons to contact him.
__________________
The Following User Says Thank You to Coach For This Useful Post:
It's insane how hard Republicans are going after the Clintons, yet are hands off of Epstein's bestie. Hilary Clinton never even met Epstein, and there's no proof that she did... yet they're so loyal to Trump that they'll trail the smallest of breadcrumbs to accuse her. Then of course they'll create and doctor photos, and follow any conspiracy to accuse anyone on the left of being a pedo.
You would think Republicans/Conservatives would be the first to condemn any pedophile regardless of political affiliation, yet that's obviously not the case. I haven't seen a single Dem that is trying to protect their own, and hide being their party. It's honestly maddening, and this should be something EVERYONE wants to bring down. Burn em all.
They should haul Melania in. Melania actually knew Jeff Epstein. And probably very well.
If you had regular contact with him at all, you should be investigated or questioned at the very least. If that contact persisted after his original conviction, investigation should be mandatory.
He was a fraudulent financier of criminals and trafficked children. These were the only reasons to contact him.
Not because, as Nutlick put it, he was one of the "best tax guys"?
