Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-09-2026, 11:52 AM   #61
OILFAN #81
Everyone's Favorite Oilfan!
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Jose, California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978 View Post
Where Kadri goes depends on if the Flames will retain salary. If not, I think teams like Dallas, Colorado, LA, Vegas will be out of the mix.

No salary retained I think it will be Tampa, SJ or Utah
SJ does not have Kadri on their board.
OILFAN #81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2026, 11:56 AM   #62
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Unless it's to help knock Edmonton out of the playoffs, I don't think Calgary should be trading with San Jose. Let them mire in mediocrity and let their kids learn to lose more than win!
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
Old 02-09-2026, 11:57 AM   #63
Gugstanley
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Somewhere in Utah
Exp:
Default

I like Utah's prospect depth if Conroy can make something happen with them. Throw in Lomberg, Utah plays small and gets pushed around a lot. At least Lomberg is game go with anyone.
Gugstanley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2026, 11:57 AM   #64
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
No matter what line Hitler played on.
I read that post a couple of times and still don't understand the Hitler reference. What team was Hitler on for that series?

Last edited by Strange Brew; 02-09-2026 at 12:01 PM.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2026, 11:58 AM   #65
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
Utah has a ton of prospect and draft capital. They don't need to trade one of their best pieces, they will be able to assemble compelling offers from what else they have.

- They've got one first, and 3 2nds, this year.
- They've got one first, one 2nd next year
- They've got a bevy of other prospects to put on the table: Simashev, Lamoureux, But, Beaudoin

I just don't see them being willing to move Iginla or Desnoyers when they have so much powder in the keg to use instead
Depends on what the Mammoth want out of the Flames. If they want Kadri with full retention then I doubt Conroy settles for a package of parts. If they want Whitecloud too then that is an even bigger return.

If the main pieces they put forward is Beaudoin and a 1st in the 20s then I doubt Conroy gives them 4 retention slots or Whitecloud. At that point this year's retention slot is better used to beef up Coleman's value (not to mention the following 3 years of retention slots) and Whitecloud can be dealt separately elsewhere for more value.

Kadri (50% retained) + Whitecloud + Cooley + Vegas 1st for Desnoyers + Vanecek

or

Kadri for Beaudoin + 2026 1st
__________________
Wolven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2026, 11:59 AM   #66
Macho0978
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald View Post
Unless it's to help knock Edmonton out of the playoffs, I don't think Calgary should be trading with San Jose. Let them mire in mediocrity and let their kids learn to lose more than win!
I would rather drain them of assets and give them a 36-year-old than let them use those assets for someone better long term.

What does Celebrini's next deal look like? $18M a year?
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Macho0978 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-09-2026, 12:10 PM   #67
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978 View Post
I would rather drain them of assets and give them a 36-year-old than let them use those assets for someone better long term.

What does Celebrini's next deal look like? $18M a year?
Just coming off his ELC? You have to think he gives them a deal on his RFA years.... $15M for 7 years? That is like 5 RFA years and 2 UFA years?

Smith's contract comes up at the same time. I can see him waiting for Celebrini to go first and then ask for $10-12M.
__________________
Wolven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2026, 12:52 PM   #68
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven View Post
Depends on what the Mammoth want out of the Flames. If they want Kadri with full retention then I doubt Conroy settles for a package of parts. If they want Whitecloud too then that is an even bigger return.

If the main pieces they put forward is Beaudoin and a 1st in the 20s then I doubt Conroy gives them 4 retention slots or Whitecloud. At that point this year's retention slot is better used to beef up Coleman's value (not to mention the following 3 years of retention slots) and Whitecloud can be dealt separately elsewhere for more value.

Kadri (50% retained) + Whitecloud + Cooley + Vegas 1st for Desnoyers + Vanecek

or

Kadri for Beaudoin + 2026 1st
Desnoyers ain't worth all that.

The second one is simpler and better. Probably Kerfoot also getting thrown in and us giving an expiring AHL/ECHL contract back.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ForeverFlameFan For This Useful Post:
Old 02-09-2026, 01:03 PM   #69
Macho0978
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven View Post
Just coming off his ELC? You have to think he gives them a deal on his RFA years.... $15M for 7 years? That is like 5 RFA years and 2 UFA years?

Smith's contract comes up at the same time. I can see him waiting for Celebrini to go first and then ask for $10-12M.
Why would he give them a deal. That usually comes when a player has already made their big money.

He will get a blank cheque similar to McDavid.
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2026, 01:05 PM   #70
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
I read that post a couple of times and still don't understand the Hitler reference. What team was Hitler on for that series?
My only guess is he's referring to Hudler being on Calgary's top line.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 02-09-2026, 01:41 PM   #71
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
Desnoyers ain't worth all that.

The second one is simpler and better. Probably Kerfoot also getting thrown in and us giving an expiring AHL/ECHL contract back.
Desnoyers is worth that to the Flames. The question is really whether or not a package that big gets the Mammoth to consider it. Logically it works for both teams: Flames get a prospect they need and Mammoth get an injection of skill in key positions, playoff experience, and GAF that can help them through multiple playoff runs.

The second deal is significantly worse. Beaudoin is interesting but I doubt he becomes a top line C, which means the Flames are getting more of the same level of assets that they already have. The additional late 1st round pick probably gets another middle 6 forward, which again generates more of the same without addressing the big need.

Of course, the biggest wrench in the idea is Kadri. Chances are good that he wouldn't want to go to Utah and then we are back to square 1.
__________________
Wolven is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wolven For This Useful Post:
Old 02-09-2026, 01:49 PM   #72
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald View Post
Unless it's to help knock Edmonton out of the playoffs, I don't think Calgary should be trading with San Jose. Let them mire in mediocrity and let their kids learn to lose more than win!
The Coil's grip on a playoff spot is tenuous right now. Absolutely help their competition knock them out.

LA has already loaded up with Panarin. It will take a team effort but the Ducks, Sharks, Kings and Kraken can do it.
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2026, 01:52 PM   #73
YyjFlames
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
Desnoyers ain't worth all that.

The second one is simpler and better. Probably Kerfoot also getting thrown in and us giving an expiring AHL/ECHL contract back.
He's easily worth that.

That's basically three late first rounders plus Cooley and a B prospect (Kadri is worth 1st plus B prospect; Whitecloud maybe a 1st) for the 4th overall pick.

It's doubtful they'd do a quantity for quality deal like that, but it's certainly not too much. It's probably too little.
YyjFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2026, 01:57 PM   #74
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

I don't think SJ is good enough to be trading for vets but whatever...if they have the best offer you take it
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2026, 03:51 PM   #75
Macho0978
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
I don't think SJ is good enough to be trading for vets but whatever...if they have the best offer you take it
I doubt SJ would trade big assets for Kadri, but if the Flames refuse to retain salary that could knock out some teams in the mix.

I could see SJ or Utah sneaking in and paying less and not asking for salary retention as they don't need it right now or next year.

Tampa could trade for him as well and Bjorkstrand coming back should allow them to add Kadri. Tampa cap situation next year is pretty good they could just pay Kadri his full $7M

Carolina too, but some are saying Kadri has them on his no trade list
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2026, 03:57 PM   #76
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978 View Post
I doubt SJ would trade big assets for Kadri, but if the Flames refuse to retain salary that could knock out some teams in the mix.

I could see SJ or Utah sneaking in and paying less and not asking for salary retention as they don't need it right now or next year.

Tampa could trade for him as well and Bjorkstrand coming back should allow them to add Kadri. Tampa cap situation next year is pretty good they could just pay Kadri his full $7M

Carolina too, but some are saying Kadri has them on his no trade list
Kyprios said this, pretty firmly.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2026, 04:22 PM   #77
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven View Post
Desnoyers is worth that to the Flames. The question is really whether or not a package that big gets the Mammoth to consider it. Logically it works for both teams: Flames get a prospect they need and Mammoth get an injection of skill in key positions, playoff experience, and GAF that can help them through multiple playoff runs.

The second deal is significantly worse. Beaudoin is interesting but I doubt he becomes a top line C, which means the Flames are getting more of the same level of assets that they already have. The additional late 1st round pick probably gets another middle 6 forward, which again generates more of the same without addressing the big need.

Of course, the biggest wrench in the idea is Kadri. Chances are good that he wouldn't want to go to Utah and then we are back to square 1.
Quote:
Originally Posted by YyjFlames View Post
He's easily worth that.

That's basically three late first rounders plus Cooley and a B prospect (Kadri is worth 1st plus B prospect; Whitecloud maybe a 1st) for the 4th overall pick.

It's doubtful they'd do a quantity for quality deal like that, but it's certainly not too much. It's probably too little.
So Utah wouldn’t do it then. Beaudoin is your best bet.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ForeverFlameFan For This Useful Post:
Old 02-10-2026, 09:34 PM   #78
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

My top 3 guesses from what I have heard are

1. Detroit
2. Montreal
3. Minnesota


I do not think Kadri wants to go anywhere to far into the US.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 02-11-2026, 07:55 AM   #79
combustiblefuel
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Nanaimo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cam_calderon View Post
So was Iggy a saviour or not? Hard to tell from your post.
The Iginla worship needs to end . It been 20 years ago now . Get the #### over it. Canadian markets just clinging on the the littlest thing.His first kid in the nhl has no where near as good as stats as the og. Let the thought die .

It's boomer ( and a bit super young millennial) nostalgia when an iginlas brought uo. Let that past die it's not that good.

Last edited by combustiblefuel; 02-11-2026 at 07:58 AM.
combustiblefuel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2026, 08:45 AM   #80
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by combustiblefuel View Post
The Iginla worship needs to end . It been 20 years ago now . Get the #### over it. Canadian markets just clinging on the the littlest thing.His first kid in the nhl has no where near as good as stats as the og. Let the thought die .

It's boomer ( and a bit super young millennial) nostalgia when an iginlas brought uo. Let that past die it's not that good.
Deeply offended you skipped right over Gen X ....
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 PM.

Calgary Flames
2025-26






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy