Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-31-2026, 07:12 PM   #29181
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist View Post
And the party rules governing membership requirements are irrelevant to you?
Not all of the parties have rules restricting membership if you are in an active member of another party.

I believe the Liberals added a rule last year because there was so much online chatter about trying to spoil the leadership race and prevent Carney from winning. I don't know if the rule is still there or not.

The conservatives have their rule about not holding membership in another federal party. They are scared to have their members go and flirt with the other parties.

NDP do not care because they are an actual party of the people.
__________________
Wolven is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2026, 07:22 PM   #29182
calgarygeologist
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven View Post
Not all of the parties have rules restricting membership if you are in an active member of another party.

I believe the Liberals added a rule last year because there was so much online chatter about trying to spoil the leadership race and prevent Carney from winning. I don't know if the rule is still there or not.

The conservatives have their rule about not holding membership in another federal party. They are scared to have their members go and flirt with the other parties.

NDP do not care because they are an actual party of the people.
It's incredible who little you know about the things you advocate for and especially that you don't know the basics of the party you support.

From the NDP constitution (so much for being the party of the people as you put it):
Quote:
Individual Membership (a) Individual membership shall be open to every resident of Canada, regardless of race, colour, religion, sex, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, or national origin who undertakes to accept and abide by the constitution and principles of the Party and who is not a member or supporter of any other political party.
All three main parties plus the Bloc restrict membership to a single party.
calgarygeologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2026, 07:25 PM   #29183
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven View Post
I believe the Liberals added a rule last year because there was so much online chatter about trying to spoil the leadership race and prevent Carney from winning. I don't know if the rule is still there or not.
I didn't know that they changed it.

I tried to cancel my Liberal membership years ago when I signed up with the Green party and I received a response saying I could cancel if I wanted to, but they didn't care if people were members of both parties. The Green party said the same thing at the time as well.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
Old 01-31-2026, 07:46 PM   #29184
afc wimbledon
Franchise Player
 
afc wimbledon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by activeStick View Post
Lol how in the hell do they keep Poilievre in that position after he lost a gimme of an election all on his own, proceeded to lose his own seat and needed to move to a different district altogether just to stay?! Not going to complain though haha.
Who would want the job right now? PP is just a placeholder at this point although he is likely to stupid to know it, what passes for the big dogs in the Tories aren't going to step up to lead a party almost certain to get beaten senseless by Carney, they will let Poilevre lead them to the next loss and then plan on stepping in when Carney retires
afc wimbledon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to afc wimbledon For This Useful Post:
Old 01-31-2026, 07:49 PM   #29185
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist View Post
It's incredible who little you know about the things you advocate for and especially that you don't know the basics of the party you support.

From the NDP constitution (so much for being the party of the people as you put it):


All three main parties plus the Bloc restrict membership to a single party.
What’s the punishment?
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2026, 08:04 PM   #29186
afc wimbledon
Franchise Player
 
afc wimbledon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
What’s the punishment?
membership in the Conservative Party is surly punishment enough?
afc wimbledon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to afc wimbledon For This Useful Post:
Old 01-31-2026, 08:09 PM   #29187
calgarygeologist
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
What’s the punishment?
Loss of moral superiority license.
calgarygeologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2026, 08:27 PM   #29188
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist View Post
Loss of moral superiority license.
Wha if the party I joined elects a leader that raped a bunch of kids? Should I double down and stick with them and make fun of everyone else for being political?
Scroopy Noopers is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2026, 08:33 PM   #29189
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist View Post
Loss of moral superiority license.
Neat.

What’s the actual punishment?
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2026, 08:55 PM   #29190
calgarygeologist
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Neat.

What’s the actual punishment?
Email the parties and find out what their repercussions are.
calgarygeologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2026, 09:54 PM   #29191
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Neat.

What’s the actual punishment?
Carries the same sentence as being a rapist pedophile in the US.







Absolutely nothing
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2026, 12:35 AM   #29192
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist View Post
Email the parties and find out what their repercussions are.
It's incredible how little you know about the things you advocate against and especially that you don't know the basics of the party you support.
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Old 02-01-2026, 06:44 AM   #29193
puffnstuff
Franchise Player
 
puffnstuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: wearing raccoons for boots
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
Only 2500 CPC members out of 600K + voted for PP?
He got 87 percent of the 3000 attendees so 2500ish which is 0.01 percent of conservative voters last election.
More interesting is that nearly 400 people paid a 1000 dollars to be at the convention and vote against pp
puffnstuff is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to puffnstuff For This Useful Post:
Old 02-01-2026, 09:50 AM   #29194
calgarygeologist
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
It's incredible how little you know about the things you advocate against and especially that you don't know the basics of the party you support.
Neat. Thanks for trying to contribute something useful.
calgarygeologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2026, 10:11 AM   #29195
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist View Post
It's incredible who little you know about the things you advocate for and especially that you don't know the basics of the party you support.

From the NDP constitution (so much for being the party of the people as you put it):


All three main parties plus the Bloc restrict membership to a single party.
What is really incredible is how little this 'gotcha' moment matters. These aren't the basics, these are the fine print and inside the fine print they have other words about waiving Article III if the executive decides to. The position of the NDP on membership rules hardly matters when you consider the other two parties.

A members of the provincial NDP were auto-enrolled into the Federal NDP. Do you think they checked to see if those people were in another party beforehand? No.

Besides, the answer to following the rules is simple. You do not need to be an active member of multiple parties at the same time. Leadership races are the most important time and they hardly ever overlap. If you are passionate about a specific party's policies and the nuts and bolts of how that party works then maintaining an ongoing membership allows you to try and have your voice heard. Otherwise you can let your membership go when nothing is happening (like right now with the LPC).

Most importantly though, I would say that one should always join the parties in good faith. Go in to learn and participate and try to make the party better, because having multiple strong parties makes Canada better. The people who wanted to sabotage the Liberals are the reason these rules are in place.

It is weird that you focused on this so hard, but I am guessing you saw free argument points and not that you actually care about being able to join other parties.
__________________
Wolven is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2026, 10:20 AM   #29196
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist View Post
Neat. Thanks for trying to contribute something useful.
Give it a shot yourself sometime.
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Old 02-01-2026, 11:53 AM   #29197
calgarygeologist
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven View Post
What is really incredible is how little this 'gotcha' moment matters. These aren't the basics, these are the fine print and inside the fine print they have other words about waiving Article III if the executive decides to. The position of the NDP on membership rules hardly matters when you consider the other two parties.

A members of the provincial NDP were auto-enrolled into the Federal NDP. Do you think they checked to see if those people were in another party beforehand? No.

Besides, the answer to following the rules is simple. You do not need to be an active member of multiple parties at the same time. Leadership races are the most important time and they hardly ever overlap. If you are passionate about a specific party's policies and the nuts and bolts of how that party works then maintaining an ongoing membership allows you to try and have your voice heard. Otherwise you can let your membership go when nothing is happening (like right now with the LPC).

Most importantly though, I would say that one should always join the parties in good faith. Go in to learn and participate and try to make the party better, because having multiple strong parties makes Canada better. The people who wanted to sabotage the Liberals are the reason these rules are in place.

It is weird that you focused on this so hard, but I am guessing you saw free argument points and not that you actually care about being able to join other parties.
You are most likely an NDP member both federally and provincial. I'm assuming you've reached out to the powers at be and proposed your amendment to the parties constitution to scrap the official rule on multiple memberships based on your reasoning that there are policy lessons to be learned from conservative, liberal and green members.
calgarygeologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2026, 01:28 PM   #29198
Wormius
Franchise Player
 
Wormius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
Exp:
Default

Who cares if you have multiple party memberships or not anyway?
Wormius is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wormius For This Useful Post:
Old 02-01-2026, 01:31 PM   #29199
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius View Post
Who cares if you have multiple party memberships or not anyway?
Those who enjoy arguing about “moral superiority”.
Scroopy Noopers is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2026, 01:38 PM   #29200
calgarygeologist
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius View Post
Who cares if you have multiple party memberships or not anyway?
Those who crafted the party constitutions.
calgarygeologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:50 PM.

Calgary Flames
2025-26






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy