Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-17-2026, 05:00 PM   #23981
sec304
First Line Centre
 
sec304's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sec214 View Post
Craig is getting some nibbles
sec304 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 05:01 PM   #23982
howard_the_duck
Franchise Player
 
howard_the_duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Once again, the organization took the high road, and treated the player with class.
If it’s that close, I’m at a loss for why he played today. Some may see that as classy, I think that would be bordering on reckless.
howard_the_duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 05:03 PM   #23983
calculoso
Franchise Player
 
calculoso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default 2025/2026 Season Trade Rumours and Speculation Thread

Highest time on ice for the Flames today by 4 minutes (25 vs 21 for Bahl and Weegar). They certainly were not limiting him.
calculoso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 05:03 PM   #23984
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by howard_the_duck View Post
If it’s that close, I’m at a loss for why he played today. Some may see that as classy, I think that would be bordering on reckless.
He did have a little say in the situation, if he wanted to play that card….. so why force it?
CalgaryFan1988 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 05:05 PM   #23985
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob View Post
I thought Flames were the only one. Who was the first?
The Flames were the only ones to beat the Habs for the Cup, but the Rangers beat the Maroons there in 1928 (the Forum was originally built to be the home of the Maroons and the Habs moved in a couple years after it opened).
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 01-17-2026, 05:06 PM   #23986
Macindoc
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob View Post
I thought Flames were the only one. Who was the first?
It wasn’t vs the Habs. Rangers beat the Maroons in 1928.
Macindoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 05:06 PM   #23987
Heavy Jack
Franchise Player
 
Heavy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the studio
Exp:
Default

So excited man; another 26 1st would be unreal so anything on top of that is truly gravy, I’d be fine with a 26 1st + prospect… 3 pieces would be such a good return.
Heavy Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 05:06 PM   #23988
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Once again, the organization took the high road, and treated the player with class.
So he needs to return the favor and agree to sign in Boston.
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 05:07 PM   #23989
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Torture View Post
Game is over, when is the trade call?
Depends on the return, right? If it is a 1st and non-roster prospect(s) then the Bruins game doesn't really matter.

If Lohrei is a part of the package then before/after the Bruins game would make sense.

If Letourneau and the Leafs 1st is a part of the deal then they can pull the trigger at any time.

I wonder how the Bruins are going to sort out their cap situation.
__________________
Wolven is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 05:08 PM   #23990
McG
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Rebiggling, Alberta
Exp:
Default

How are the flames for contracts and salary cap implications if this happens as envisioned?

Just asking if there has to be other moves to remain compliant with rules.

I’d retain salary if it meant getting the best deal.
__________________
Franchise > Team > Player

Future historians will celebrate June 24, 2024 as the date when the timeline corrected itself.
McG is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 05:08 PM   #23991
howard_the_duck
Franchise Player
 
howard_the_duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988 View Post
He did have a little say in the situation, if he wanted to play that card….. so why force it?
It’s nice to accommodate players but this is one where you just need to prioritize what’s right for the franchise. Again, you weigh the risk/reward and personally I don’t think it’s close.
howard_the_duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 05:09 PM   #23992
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by howard_the_duck View Post
It’s nice to accommodate players but this is one where you just need to prioritize what’s right for the franchise. Again, you weigh the risk/reward and personally I don’t think it’s close.
And yet nothing happened
Bonded is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 05:09 PM   #23993
Roko
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Exp:
Default

I just hope we are happy with the return. I just want to feel like I felt after the lindholm trade
Roko is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Roko For This Useful Post:
Old 01-17-2026, 05:10 PM   #23994
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heavy Jack View Post
So excited man; another 26 1st would be unreal so anything on top of that is truly gravy, I’d be fine with a 26 1st + prospect… 3 pieces would be such a good return.
If the prospect is Poitras he would draw into the Flames lineup almost immediately as he's nhl ready.

A 21yo center with untapped potential and a lot to prove. I really like the idea of him and another 1st.. if its Torontos, which could be a mid round pick, even better.
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TrentCrimmIndependent For This Useful Post:
Old 01-17-2026, 05:11 PM   #23995
Swifty16
Farm Team Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

My gut is telling me that this is a diabolical move by the Flames AND Andersson….fiend wanting an extension but move him for the best non extension deal and resign Rasmus back next year with additional resources/picks!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Swifty16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 05:12 PM   #23996
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McG View Post
How are the flames for contracts and salary cap implications if this happens as envisioned?

Just asking if there has to be other moves to remain compliant with rules.

I’d retain salary if it meant getting the best deal.
They're good no matter what happens. If it's Boston, there will need to be some cap coming back because they don't have enough room for Ras's full cap hit.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
McG
Old 01-17-2026, 05:12 PM   #23997
CFO
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Exp:
Default

Poitras changed agents yesterday too?
CFO is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CFO For This Useful Post:
Old 01-17-2026, 05:15 PM   #23998
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by howard_the_duck View Post
It’s nice to accommodate players but this is one where you just need to prioritize what’s right for the franchise. Again, you weigh the risk/reward and personally I don’t think it’s close.
Ok. So theoretically, what if Andersson said he’ll look at signing an extension with another team, but I want to play one last home game first.

Do you trade him for a lesser return as a rental or let him play one more home game and get a better return?
CalgaryFan1988 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2026, 05:18 PM   #23999
Torture
Loves Teh Chat!
 
Torture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

So quiet now....
Torture is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Torture For This Useful Post:
Old 01-17-2026, 05:18 PM   #24000
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

"Rasmus, we would really appreciate it if you would sign an extension with the team we want to trade with"

"Can I have one more game at home, first?"

"No, #### you"
Enoch Root is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:33 PM.

Calgary Flames
2025-26






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy