[Trade] Tkachuk (8 yrs x $9.5 mil) + `25 4th to FLA for Huberdeau, Weegar, Schwindt & `25 1st

[Jay Random]

Originally Posted by GioforPM

There is a sworn affidavit (i.e. evidence) by a victim about Trump and Epstein in the civil case that was dropped after she was threatened.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket...5/doe-v-trump/

Were charges pressed? No, they were not. Prosecutors who were absolutely motivated by partisan interest to attack Trump with anything and everything did not consider this affidavit to be credible, or they'd have had him up on charges.

[Jay Random]

Originally Posted by Mitch

Cool. You do know Trump ####ed kids right?

I do not know any such thing, and neither do you. But you think because he's Trump, he must automatically be guilty of everything and it's fair to attack him on any grounds.

That says more about you than him.

[UnitedFlames]

I bet Chuckles is lobbying for a job post-hockey. Because anyone can be appointed by Trump so long as you're loyal, stupid, and have zero conscience. Is there any position coming open? Secretary of State? If that woman's face melts off, they'll need a new head of Homeland Security. Secretary of Defence oops I mean War, if Hegseth gets promoted...? Chuckles could do any of those roles.

[Shazam]

Well here we are at the nadir of the trade thread.

[Jay Random]

Originally Posted by GioforPM

wrong image - read your article

One fake image is no better evidence than another.

[dino7c]

Originally Posted by Jay Random

Were charges pressed? No, they were not. Prosecutors who were absolutely motivated by partisan interest to attack Trump with anything and everything did not consider this affidavit to be credible, or they'd have had him up on charges.

Yeah imagine a white billionare getting away with a crime using bribes and power lol. Impossible

Like are you even serious? Files are on my desk, there are no files democratic hoax. Lets start a war the day the files are supposed to be released.
Maxwell says Trump did nothing wrong, gets moved to hilton of prisons the next day

Speaking of TDS

He was also found to have Raped E. Jean Carroll, ask the judge.

[TrentCrimmIndependent]

Originally Posted by Jay Random

Evidence that he did so ANYWHERE at ANY time? You have none? Thank you very much.

I guess you can't argue with wilful ignorance.

You could be presented with 4K footage of him doing the deed and you'd chalk it up to AI, because your mind has already been made up.

[Jay Random]

Originally Posted by dino7c

Yeah imagine a white billionare getting away with a crime using bribes and power lol. Impossible

He was convicted of every other bloody thing they threw at him. He was not even charged for this. If he had the power to get away with statutory rape, why didn't he use it all those other times, too?

Like are you even serious? Files are on my desk, there are no files democratic hoax. Lets start a war the day the files are supposed to be released.
Speaking of TDS

If the files are so damaging to Trump, why did the Biden administration not release them for four solid years, including the 2024 campaign?

[TrentCrimmIndependent]

Well I'm certainly changing my avatar. Oof..

[GioforPM]

Originally Posted by Jay Random

He was convicted of every other bloody thing they threw at him. He was not even charged for this. If he had the power to get away with statutory rape, why didn't he use it all those other times, too?



If the files are so damaging to Trump, why did the Biden administration not release them for four solid years, including the 2024 campaign?

Because Biden doesn't interfere with the DOJ like Trump (and Merrick Garland has feet of clay).

[Jay Random]

Originally Posted by TrentCrimmIndependent

I guess you can't argue with wilful ignorance.

You could be presented with 4K footage of him doing the deed and you'd chalk it up to AI, because your mind has already been made up.

I haven't been presented with anything connected with this specific accusation. Nor has anyone. No charges were ever laid.

I don't believe in accusing people of the most heinous crimes in the book without proof. It's disgusting behaviour. But again, you all seem to think there are no limits as long as it's Trump you're attacking.

Well, believe it or not, he's a human being too.

[dino7c]

Originally Posted by Jay Random

He was convicted of every other bloody thing they threw at him. He was not even charged for this. If he had the power to get away with statutory rape, why didn't he use it all those other times, too?



If the files are so damaging to Trump, why did the Biden administration not release them for four solid years, including the 2024 campaign?

oh no! what am I gonna do with my Biden hat, my Biden bible, my Biden shoes!!

Trump is the president RIGHT NOW if the files exonerate him why is he hiding them?

[GioforPM]

Originally Posted by Jay Random

Were charges pressed? No, they were not. Prosecutors who were absolutely motivated by partisan interest to attack Trump with anything and everything did not consider this affidavit to be credible, or they'd have had him up on charges.

You asked for evidence, this is evidence. The statute of limitations had long expired on that one.

[Jay Random]

Originally Posted by GioforPM

Because Biden doesn't interfere with the DOJ like Trump (and Merrick Garland has feet of clay).

So your logic is that Trump is guilty of statutory rape, which is a state offence, but he was never charged by the federal DOJ because Biden would have had to ‘interfere’ to get them to do the job they're supposed to do, only they're not supposed to in this case because, as I said, it's a state offence in the first place and not a federal one?

Crikey, I'm glad you're not a criminal lawyer. That's the dumbest attempt at logic I've heard for some time.

[GioforPM]

Originally Posted by Jay Random

So your logic is that Trump is guilty of statutory rape, which is a state offence, but he was never charged by the federal DOJ because Biden would have had to ‘interfere’ to get them to do the job they're supposed to do, only they're not supposed to in this case because, as I said, it's a state offence in the first place and not a federal one?

Crikey, I'm glad you're not a criminal lawyer. That's the dumbest attempt at logic I've heard for some time.

You asked why they didn't release the files. That was a federal case and the files were under the charge of federal judges.

I told you why he wasn't charged in the Jane Doe case.

[Party Elephant]

Is anyone surprised that Jay Random is white knighting for Trump? Talk about virtue signaling.

[dino7c]

Jay, I don't care about Biden...like at all
Maybe he is a pedo too

One question if the files exonerate him why is he hiding them? Like don't be stupid. History won't be kind

[Jay Random]

Originally Posted by GioforPM

You asked for evidence, this is evidence. The statute of limitations had long expired on that one.

I quote:

The timeframe for the state to file criminal charges against an alleged offender for sexual assault in New York depends on the severity of the crime. For the most serious felony sexual offenses, such as Rape in the First Degree, there is no statute of limitations. This means a prosecutor can bring charges against the accused at any time, no matter how much time has passed since the alleged assault.

For other felony sexual offenses, the deadlines are defined by law. Prosecution for Rape in the Second Degree must begin within twenty years of the offense or ten years from when it was first reported to law enforcement, whichever deadline comes first. For Rape in the Third Degree, the statute of limitations is ten years. For misdemeanor sexual offenses, which are less severe, the time limit is two years from the commission of the act.

Raping a child is automatically considered first-degree rape in most jurisdictions in the U.S. There is no statute of limitations on that charge in New York, where this affidavit was filed. Trump could have been charged, and would have been charged with that when he was being charged with everything else the New York DA's could find – if there had been anything credible about the accusation.

https://legalclarity.org/new-york-st...exual-assault/

[gvitaly]

Can we stop bumping any threads with [Trade] tag and a Flames logo in them until after Andersson is traded?

I keep getting my hopes up...

[GioforPM]

Originally Posted by Jay Random

I quote:



Raping a child is automatically considered first-degree rape in most jurisdictions in the U.S. There is no statute of limitations on that charge in New York, where this affidavit was filed. Trump could have been charged, and would have been charged with that when he was being charged with everything else the New York DA's could find – if there had been anything credible about the accusation.

https://legalclarity.org/new-york-st...exual-assault/

I think you should just read the affidavit.