01-15-2026, 10:26 PM
|
#861
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inferno
|
Thought it would be way more. So his actual AAV in today’s dollars is still above $50 million.
The deferrals don’t bother me. That’s really a tax planning issue and other organizations could do it. It’s the actual money that is outrageous.
|
|
|
01-15-2026, 10:28 PM
|
#862
|
|
Commie Referee
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to KootenayFlamesFan For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-15-2026, 10:31 PM
|
#863
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
If the Jays had signed Tucker for 8 years $240MM, would we be fine with it? Same money, just longer term.
|
|
|
01-15-2026, 10:32 PM
|
#864
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Calgary, AB
|
I don’t know much about Kyle Tucker but this bothers me for some reason, probably mostly because it feels like Ohtani all over again. The Jays deserve better in my opinion than to be used as a bargaining chip. This is business after all and once again, money talks.
|
|
|
01-15-2026, 10:38 PM
|
#865
|
|
Franchise Player
|
The dodgers are just taking advantage of the flaws of MLB in an exaggerated way. But the issues are the Dodgers, the issue is MLB largely only cares if their major markets are competitive. That's what drives the league and the revenues.
It's hypocritical to be upset about it, because the Jays are certainly one of the have teams.
It must suck to be one of the many have nots.
With all that said, that contract is truly NUTS.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-15-2026, 10:50 PM
|
#866
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
It's hypocritical to be upset about it, because the Jays are certainly one of the have teams.
|
It's really not. The Jays situation is not comparable to the Dodgers situation. Besides, even if it was, it's still not wrong to call the system a joke where championships go to the highest bidder.
Do the Jays benefit from it? Yes. But it's still a bad system. There should be some sort of reasonable checks & balances in place to ensure some level of competitive balance in the sport. It's starting to get to the point where just a few teams are light years ahead of the pack (and the Dodgers light years ahead of that group).
__________________
Last edited by Mathgod; 01-15-2026 at 10:56 PM.
|
|
|
01-15-2026, 11:06 PM
|
#868
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Disappointing, but that contract is absurdly stupid. Something needs to be done to fix this.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to agulati For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-15-2026, 11:23 PM
|
#869
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathgod
It's really not. The Jays situation is not comparable to the Dodgers situation. Besides, even if it was, it's still not wrong to call the system a joke where championships go to the highest bidder.
Do the Jays benefit from it? Yes. But it's still a bad system. There should be some sort of reasonable checks & balances in place to ensure some level of competitive balance in the sport. It's starting to get to the point where just a few teams are light years ahead of the pack (and the Dodgers light years ahead of that group).
|
We are saying the same things. I perhaps didn't word it well.
The system is broke regardless of whether the Jays are one of the teams that take advantage of it.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-15-2026, 11:32 PM
|
#870
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Even seeing that Mets offer is absurd.
I cant wait for Tucker to play 130 games next year. Hit .270 with 25hr's. Just like his career slash line.
|
|
|
01-16-2026, 12:18 AM
|
#871
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dieHARDflameZ
I don’t know much about Kyle Tucker but this bothers me for some reason, probably mostly because it feels like Ohtani all over again. The Jays deserve better in my opinion than to be used as a bargaining chip. This is business after all and once again, money talks.
|
Were the Jays the bargaining chip in this scenario...feels more like the Mets were.
I think Tucker actually preferred the Jays.
But I think 4 years and $240M is too absurd to say no to, and my guess is Jays were offering a more "normal" contract
|
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-16-2026, 05:27 AM
|
#872
|
|
Commie Referee
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to KootenayFlamesFan For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-16-2026, 07:05 AM
|
#873
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KootenayFlamesFan
|
All I've learned from this is that I should have stuck with baseball. I was a pretty good little league player, an all-star in my last couple of years, and at 17 was invited to join a development league analogous to low A-ball. I decided that I didn't want to commit to the sport long term, but I should have kept at it based on that signing bonus alone. #### me. What a ridiculous sport for salaries.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Cali Panthers Fan For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-16-2026, 07:32 AM
|
#874
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
|
Only winner in all of this is Tucker cause that is a really, really bad contract. At his historic performance rate they are going to be paying $10 million for every 1 WAR. That is insane. Their other FA contracts at least made sense and even were solid value (Ohtani is a bargain with the additional revenue he brings in), but this is the first contract the Dodgers have done that has truly felt like a "#### all of you" contract instead of a contract that makes sense.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
Last edited by Senator Clay Davis; 01-16-2026 at 07:39 AM.
|
|
|
01-16-2026, 08:15 AM
|
#875
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
While I hope a Bichette reunion is still on the table, I worry that ship has sailed. Seems like Phillies are ready to pay and add term.
Still a good offseason just ends on a bitter note.
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to howard_the_duck For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-16-2026, 09:45 AM
|
#876
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
|
The betting odds have shifted to basically a pick em on where Bichette lands after the Tucker signing.
Philly is still a slight favourite at -125 but Toronto is now +110.
|
|
|
01-16-2026, 10:28 AM
|
#877
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
The Score alert saying Bo’s agent has concerns of him playing on the Jays artificial turf. All these years he didn’t have an issue now he does? Why does it come out now? Anyway, sounds like the Jays are out of that sweepstakes for that to come out at this time.
|
|
|
01-16-2026, 10:35 AM
|
#878
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
|
Yeah that sounds like he's as good as gone. Damage control with the fan base before he ultimately signs else where
|
|
|
01-16-2026, 11:05 AM
|
#879
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Hearing Bichette to the Mets (unconfirmed).
sad.
|
|
|
01-16-2026, 11:07 AM
|
#880
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
|
OMG. 42 per season for Bo
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiggy_12 For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:41 PM.
|
|