01-07-2026, 11:33 PM
|
#701
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Pas, MB
|
|
|
|
01-08-2026, 12:06 AM
|
#702
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by howard_the_duck
I would be surprised at this point if they go after Tucker or Bo. I’d have loved one of them, but it feels to me more this is their last free agent splash.
Could always see a trade to reduce our logjam of outfielders, of course.
Regardless, a hell of an offseason.
|
Well be surprised now I guess...they are going after both of them. Landing them or not depends on the player
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
01-08-2026, 12:25 AM
|
#703
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Cough up some dough Rogers. You definitely save enough in the quality of broadcasts. Use it towards these bats.
|
|
|
01-08-2026, 10:08 AM
|
#704
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by agulati
Cough up some dough Rogers. You definitely save enough in the quality of broadcasts. Use it towards these bats.
|
They're already over $300 million in payroll, second only to the Dodgers, and by all accounts have been the most aggressive suitor in the pursuit of Tucker. What more would you like them to do? Lol
|
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-08-2026, 10:11 AM
|
#705
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Obviously Tucker going to the Mets would be better than an AL east team or the Dodgers, but it sure will be annoying losing an elite hitting OFer for the second year in a row to that tire fire.
Tucker could be that piece that really puts the Jays up another level. Hes the type of talent that could put up some 6+ WAR seasons if he is healthy.
|
|
|
01-08-2026, 11:34 AM
|
#706
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
They're already over $300 million in payroll, second only to the Dodgers, and by all accounts have been the most aggressive suitor in the pursuit of Tucker. What more would you like them to do? Lol
|
Yeah. The Blue Jays are spending as a top market team - you don't have to agree with all their decisions (I never liked the Gimenez trade eg) but I don't think you can fault them for not spending money. They locked Vlad in for a half billion dollars starting this year, and were still the biggest FA spenders so far even excluding that deal, and are still pursuing spending more.
|
|
|
01-08-2026, 12:22 PM
|
#707
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
Well be surprised now I guess...they are going after both of them. Landing them or not depends on the player
|
Yeah. I still haven't wrapped my head around their new free spending ways. Looking at their lineup and roster construction after Okamoto, I was skeptical. Hopefully they can land Tucker.
|
|
|
01-08-2026, 12:40 PM
|
#708
|
|
UnModerator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia.
|
Rogers head view the Jays as his pet product and we know the play-off run was incredibly lucrative for them.
I think they're realizing that even spending half a billion on this team still pays them big money.
__________________

THANK MR DEMKOCPHL Ottawa Vancouver
|
|
|
01-08-2026, 12:52 PM
|
#709
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Jays World Series Run Nets Rogers an Estimated $100 Million in Revenue
Quote:
On Monday, a new report from the Financial Post offered more clarity as to just how much money the Jays brought in from their run to the World Series. An estimate from a National Bank of Canada analyst suggests “the MLB playoff run was worth over $100 million” in revenue for Blue Jays ownership.
I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s still a conservative number. After all, there are so many ways a playoff run can indirectly increase a team's revenue. For example, I wonder if that $100 million estimate includes the ad revenue Rogers brought in from all the extra traffic the Sportsnet website and YouTube channel were surely getting last October.
Not to mention, the monetary benefits of a deep postseason run don’t go away when the postseason ends.
|
https://jayscentre.com/toronto-blue-...ostseason-run/
Re-invest, re-invest, re-invest!
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Since1984 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mile For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-08-2026, 01:53 PM
|
#711
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Bo reportedly asking for 10/$300 million.
Like wut dafuq dude? Get real.
No wonder he hasn't signed yet.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-08-2026, 02:05 PM
|
#712
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
Bo reportedly asking for 10/$300 million.
Like wut dafuq dude? Get real.
No wonder he hasn't signed yet.
|
LOL. for a 2/5 tool player who probably won't age well.
Love Bo, want him back, he's really good at hitting and the Jays can absorb his deficiencies - but that's an outrageous ask.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiggy_12 For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-08-2026, 02:09 PM
|
#713
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
I wonder if his being on the Jays, the short-term deals, arbitration hearings have all taken a toll?
Seeing your star running mate make bank as essentially a bat-only player (still a hell of a 1B) would mess with your head a bit I'd imagine.
That's the only way I can rationalize that type of contract demands.
I like Bo, but so much of his value is tied up in his batting average. The guy doesn't walk and has shown some year-to-year inconsistency too.
I'd do 5/$150, but that's as long as I'd go.
|
|
|
01-08-2026, 02:17 PM
|
#714
|
|
I believe in the Jays.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
Bo reportedly asking for 10/$300 million.
Like wut dafuq dude? Get real.
No wonder he hasn't signed yet.
|
LOL. No.
I mean I appreciate the moxie and respect a strong opening position... but no... at that term and price the Jays are right to put more effort into going for Tucker.
Quote:
Originally Posted by howard_the_duck
I'd do 5/$150, but that's as long as I'd go.
|
Same. Bichette will not age well. 5 Years? Sure, I can buy that... 10? No way in hell.
Last edited by Parallex; 01-08-2026 at 02:21 PM.
|
|
|
01-08-2026, 02:54 PM
|
#715
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Kelowna
|
10 years Bo??? Uhh
|
|
|
01-08-2026, 04:09 PM
|
#716
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Those who were comfortable with Vlad getting a 15 year deal should ultimately be comfortable with Bo’s request. Personally I don’t agree with either getting those terms. I previously predicted he’d get upwards of $35M AAV, but on a shorter term. I don’t think he should be getting over 7 years though.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to bluejays For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-08-2026, 04:50 PM
|
#717
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
They're already over $300 million in payroll, second only to the Dodgers, and by all accounts have been the most aggressive suitor in the pursuit of Tucker. What more would you like them to do? Lol
|
Find a way to sign Tucker obviously.
And Bo. But that rumored ask is a bit much
|
|
|
01-08-2026, 04:59 PM
|
#718
|
|
Franchise Player
|
In all seriousness though, excited for the Jays season next year. Hopefully we can lock in another top bat, but this lineup can definitely make some noise again next year.
The experience in the World Series can and hopefully will pay dividends going forward
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to agulati For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-08-2026, 09:34 PM
|
#719
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Not surprised at the Bo ask. Will that be his final deal, probably not but he’s got this opportunity to make his big bag of cash like may others have done the past years including Vlad. 8 year $200 is my prediction somewhere.
|
|
|
01-08-2026, 09:40 PM
|
#720
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Since1984
|
Yeah I’m sure it’s north of that.
But the world wide audience of a feel good story by getting how close they did, has been the main driver for players to look closer at Toronto. The last couple years the Jays finally were willing to spend on Soto or Ohtahni (and others) but got turned down even with overpays.
Now they are getting people to say yes. With half of the $300MM they’ve spent having been received in one month of baseball, it makes that price tag more digestible.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:38 PM.
|
|