Even Fox is covering it
The Justice Department redacted the names and identifiers of victims. Fox News Digital has learned that the same redaction standards were applied to politically exposed individuals and government officials.#
In regards to redactions of names other than victims, the law just passed states that "No record shall be withheld, delayed, or redacted on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary."
One section that is blacked out in the list of 'massueses', which it should be as they are the victims...but there are 254 of them.
Two hundred and fifty four.
The Following User Says Thank You to puffnstuff For This Useful Post:
Here is the problem, what can anyone do about it? You have a dictator in power who has shown he does not care about the courts or the rules. There is no legal repercussions for going against the courts.
Even Fox is covering it
The Justice Department redacted the names and identifiers of victims. Fox News Digital has learned that the same redaction standards were applied to politically exposed individuals and government officials.#
In regards to redactions of names other than victims, the law just passed states that "No record shall be withheld, delayed, or redacted on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary."
One section that is blacked out in the list of 'massueses', which it should be as they are the victims...but there are 254 of them.
Two hundred and fifty four.
Yeah it doesn't matter. Someone inside the DOJ needs to leak the un-redacted files or it'll never see the light of day.
Even then, claims of AI and fraud would be rampant. Some people will believe a ridiculous lie all the way to the grave before they face being wrong.
I cannot believe Anonymous or some other hacker group hasn't gotten these and spread them like wildfire. Like, really, you could do humanity a great favor here...
__________________
"The obfuscation is everywhere. The disinfo everywhere. My head spins trying to make any sense of it all." - Jiggy_12. Me too, man, me too. Musth – mostly misunderstood.
Here is the problem, what can anyone do about it? You have a dictator in power who has shown he does not care about the courts or the rules. There is no legal repercussions for going against the courts.
Will take both sides working together to force their hand.
They're preparing impeachment documents for Pam Bondi as we speak in case the DOJ doesn't honor its promise to release the rest that was supposed to come out today.
There are also victims who can compile a client "list" and untampered evidence from the estate.
The administration inserted a photo of Bill Clinton, Michael Jackson, and Diana Ross into the Epstein files and falsely implied it showed them with victims.
In reality, it’s a publicly available fundraiser photo featuring Jackson and Ross’s own children.
Trump has really made me hate the cowardly media. Saw a headline on CBC that the Epstein files contained "Few mentions of Trump, but pictures of Clinton." Really? how many times is he mentioned under the redactions, I wonder.
The Following User Says Thank You to Ped For This Useful Post:
The Blue sky link went to a nice reminder here for any of the right wingers complaining about pedophiles.
Can someone provide with a cliff notes as I had to turn that off within a minute and while I am sure it is valuable to know I can't willingly hear the details of a child being raped.
Will take both sides working together to force their hand.
They're preparing impeachment documents for Pam Bondi as we speak in case the DOJ doesn't honor its promise to release the rest that was supposed to come out today.
There are also victims who can compile a client "list" and untampered evidence from the estate.
What the hell good is impeachment documents going to do? You really think Trump's lackeys are going to vote to impeach one of their own?
