11-15-2025, 01:00 PM
|
#1241
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by malcolmk14
Not sure if this was posted anywhere but sure enough the government never intended to hire 3000 additional teachers.
Latest Janet French article essentially says that the money in the March 2025 budget was part of the promise to hire 3000 teachers (1000 a year over 3 years) and since there are 1,045 more teachers this year than there were last year, year 1 requirements have been satisfied.
What a ####ing joke.
|
Agreed, a joke. But not surprising at all. This goverment will do everything possible to muddy the waters on this while making it SEEM like they're doing so much.
|
|
|
11-15-2025, 01:57 PM
|
#1242
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
They've never had any intention of improving education in this province, just as they've never had any intention on improving healthcare, policing, pensions, or any of their other bull#### ideas. It's all about cutting what government does and enriching private industry. If you believe they care about making our lives better, I have a Donald Trump to sell you.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-16-2025, 04:43 PM
|
#1243
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by puffnstuff
This article from yesterday
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmon...ooms-9.6979495
The 2025-26 provincial budget, which was approved by the legislature in March, assumed Alberta schools would add 1,045 full-time teaching positions between 2024 and 2025.
School boards had forecasted hiring 850 more teachers with the money provided in the budget, and are expected to hire up to 1,000, according to Elizabeth Harper, communications adviser to Education Minister Demetrios Nicolaides.
“These budgeted teacher increases are included in the count of 3,000 teachers,” she said last week in an email.
The government won’t know until late November how many of those positions were filled, she added in the email.
|
All the more reason to recall them. Not only do they not negotiate in good faith, they can't even keep their limited promises while nuking people's right to negotiate.
They are finding new lows to what 'bad faith' means.
Touching on the topic in the other thread with the potential early election. I cannot think of a better timing for a general strike than right after the government is dissolved and an election is called (especially if it pre-emptively cancels all of the recalls). It would really punch all voters in the face to have the province grind to a halt as people head to the polls.
|
|
|
11-17-2025, 05:08 PM
|
#1244
|
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by puffnstuff
This article from yesterday
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmon...ooms-9.6979495
The 2025-26 provincial budget, which was approved by the legislature in March, assumed Alberta schools would add 1,045 full-time teaching positions between 2024 and 2025.
School boards had forecasted hiring 850 more teachers with the money provided in the budget, and are expected to hire up to 1,000, according to Elizabeth Harper, communications adviser to Education Minister Demetrios Nicolaides.
“These budgeted teacher increases are included in the count of 3,000 teachers,” she said last week in an email.
The government won’t know until late November how many of those positions were filled, she added in the email.
|
Curious - did the government previously say they would hire more then the additional adds included in the budget? Or was it 3000 in addition to numbers accounted for in the prior teaching year?
|
|
|
11-17-2025, 05:14 PM
|
#1245
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CFO
Curious - did the government previously say they would hire more then the additional adds included in the budget? Or was it 3000 in addition to numbers accounted for in the prior teaching year?
|
Just curious guys!
|
|
|
11-17-2025, 05:26 PM
|
#1246
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CFO
Curious - did the government previously say they would hire more then the additional adds included in the budget? Or was it 3000 in addition to numbers accounted for in the prior teaching year?
|
Are you confused as you notice the govenrment has used misleading terms to describe their commitments when they spoke to the public in an attempt to colour teachers as greedy? Is it not clear?
I assume when most people read the words "additional" they presume it to be in "addition to" stuff that's already budgeted and done, not stuff they are promising to do when you sign the contract. The fact that it is this unclear should tell you how trustworthy they are as negotiating partners, and may perhaps shed some light as to why the teachers didn't trust the deceitful mother####ers.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:58 PM.
|
|