Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-13-2025, 02:50 PM   #12421
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigThief View Post
What's the Murray Treliving Drama?
Treliving quit on the team when they offered him an extension (likely because he knew he was getting the Toronto gig). There were rumors the flame wouldn’t let Treliving talk to the Pens earlier in the process. The Flames ultimately let him go to the Leafs a couple weeks before his contract expired but would not allow him to sit at the draft table until after the Flames made their first round pick.

It seemed like some bitterness but nothing officially confirmed. Assume Royle has a more legit scoop
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 02:50 PM   #12422
Macho0978
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
Flames need to take advantage of how tight the Eastern Conference is this year.

Only Buffalo is below .500 and that's mostly because they've been ravaged by injury.

Leafs are right at .500 but will be desperate to get back into the playoff picture.

And then you have the other 14 teams in the conference all at a .531 points percentage or better, and it's like 5 points separating 2nd and 14th in the conference.



Unless the pick is the 2029 1st it's going to be convoluted.

The 2028 1st is already tied into the conditions on the 2026 (top 5 protected) and 2027 (top 10 protected) they've traded away.
The Leafs can still trade the 1st in 28, those 2 1sts would just become unprotected 1sts.
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 02:50 PM   #12423
Royle9
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
I think Kniess for Rasmus would be an overpay - he's that good. But it really doesn't make sense for the Leafs anyway. They shore up thier D and gut their top line.
It is, which is the point everyone including Dredger is trying to make.
If the leafs want Andersson as badly as they seem to do, then they're going to have to overpay or it wont happen.

Which again, is why I don't think the two teams make sense as trade partners myself.
Royle9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 02:52 PM   #12424
BigThief
First Line Centre
 
BigThief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Treliving quit on the team when they offered him an extension (likely because he knew he was getting the Toronto gig). There were rumors the flame wouldn’t let Treliving talk to the Pens earlier in the process. The Flames ultimately let him go to the Leafs a couple weeks before his contract expired but would not allow him to sit at the draft table until after the Flames made their first round pick.

It seemed like some bitterness but nothing officially confirmed. Assume Royle has a more legit scoop
Oooo Murray Edwards? Ok got it
BigThief is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 02:55 PM   #12425
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Yen Man View Post
It took two years for Connie to get out of the mess Treliving put them in, plus he Tre didn't help with the weak prospect pool trading away all those picks over the years.

I'd say it's really short sighted not to extend Conroy at this point. When management hired him, they should have known there's going to be growing pains over the next few seasons, and I assume they were committed to his vision. To cut Connie off midway through his rebuild is not a smartway to operate IMO.
How long did you expect it to take?

Weak prospect pool? Could there have been more, sure, I guess. There probably could have been less. These complaints don’t mean anything. If your point is the Flames had no good prospects (they did btw) then what were they sacrificing in their place? Should the Flames have sat back and not traded for Toffoli (as an example)? Should they have traded Tkachuck, Gaudreau, Bennett, Monahan, Giordano, Brodie etc and not tried to win? Just stay in a perpetual state of rebuild for ……?

Not sure what the concern is on your second paragraph. Nothing to see here. I’d de surprised and disappointed if Conroy isn’t extended and I don’t see any reason why he wouldn’t be. I think the concern being raised recently is just empty chatter with not much else to discuss right now.

Treliving was trying to put a competitive team on the ice and at certain points, he did.
TOfan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 03:05 PM   #12426
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Treliving quit on the team when they offered him an extension (likely because he knew he was getting the Toronto gig). There were rumors the flame wouldn’t let Treliving talk to the Pens earlier in the process. The Flames ultimately let him go to the Leafs a couple weeks before his contract expired but would not allow him to sit at the draft table until after the Flames made their first round pick.

It seemed like some bitterness but nothing officially confirmed. Assume Royle has a more legit scoop
Treliving was reckless with the Flames in his final year...he obviously knew he wouldn't have to clean up any mess so he went all in knowing he had the Leafs deal lined up.
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 03:07 PM   #12427
howard_the_duck
#1 Goaltender
 
howard_the_duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
You can ask, but there is zero chance you are getting Knies.

20 points in 17 games, signed for a reasonable number for 6 years.
Yeah Knies is a big reason they let Marner walk. He’s arguably as valuable as Matthews is to them right now. No chance he’s involved.
howard_the_duck is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to howard_the_duck For This Useful Post:
Old 11-13-2025, 03:32 PM   #12428
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Treliving was reckless with the Flames in his final year...he obviously knew he wouldn't have to clean up any mess so he went all in knowing he had the Leafs deal lined up.
How so?

I must be missing something.

After moving Monahan to sign Kadri and having many excited about his amazing summer he made three more trades before leaving.

A nobody in for futures
Dryden Hunt for Zahorna
And the crazy Ritchie brothers deal
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 04:27 PM   #12429
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978 View Post
The Leafs can still trade the 1st in 28, those 2 1sts would just become unprotected 1sts.
Sure but I doubt they'd want to do that and leave two picks unprotected.

So it would likely have to have conditions on it. One condition being that if the 2028 pick transfers to Boston or Philadelphia then the pick the Flames receive would be the 2029 1st. And also that if the 2028 pick remains in Toronto's hands it would need to be top 5 or top 10 protected and then shift to a 2029 unprotected 1st.

They would make it have convoluted rules that could push it to 2029 for sure.

He's not going to trade the 2028 1st unprotected, which also triggers the 2026 and 2027 pick becoming unprotected.

Last edited by SuperMatt18; 11-13-2025 at 04:56 PM.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 04:55 PM   #12430
activeStick
Franchise Player
 
activeStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

My boys out here are thinking it would be a deal around Cowan and a 1st for Ras. Apparently, Cowan was also scratched last night with the Marlies?

I'm a big Ras fan though and would prefer he extends with the Flames, but would be happy with a Cowan and a 1st return.

Last edited by activeStick; 11-13-2025 at 05:00 PM.
activeStick is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to activeStick For This Useful Post:
Old 11-13-2025, 05:07 PM   #12431
Macindoc
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by activeStick View Post
My boys out here are thinking it would be a deal around Cowan and a 1st for Ras. Apparently, Cowan was also scratched last night with the Marlies?

I'm a big Ras fan though and would prefer he extends with the Flames, but would be happy with a Cowan and a 1st return.
Me too. Plus a sweetener(s) if the Leafs need to unload some salary and/or get 50% retention on Andersson.
Macindoc is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Macindoc For This Useful Post:
Old 11-13-2025, 05:08 PM   #12432
traptor
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

Rasmus 50% retained for Jarnkrok (dump) + 1st + Cowan?


With the Kampf termination they can squeeze it in.
traptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 05:14 PM   #12433
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post
How long did you expect it to take?

Weak prospect pool? Could there have been more, sure, I guess. There probably could have been less. These complaints don’t mean anything. If your point is the Flames had no good prospects (they did btw) then what were they sacrificing in their place? Should the Flames have sat back and not traded for Toffoli (as an example)? Should they have traded Tkachuck, Gaudreau, Bennett, Monahan, Giordano, Brodie etc and not tried to win? Just stay in a perpetual state of rebuild for ……?

Not sure what the concern is on your second paragraph. Nothing to see here. I’d de surprised and disappointed if Conroy isn’t extended and I don’t see any reason why he wouldn’t be. I think the concern being raised recently is just empty chatter with not much else to discuss right now.

Treliving was trying to put a competitive team on the ice and at certain points, he did.
This is fair, I don’t think Treliving is a very good GM but he came in and said I have a plan to build a winner. Part of the plan was trading away picks to make that happen. Ownership signed off on the plan.

Conroy came in and said he had a plan for a rebuild, sell off assets for picks and prospects. Ownership signed off on the plan and it is happening. Two different plans, two different sign offs. Nice thing for the Flames is ownership lets the GM state the plan and then execute the plan.
Aarongavey is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Aarongavey For This Useful Post:
Old 11-13-2025, 05:18 PM   #12434
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Cowan+1st for Andersson is more than we got for Hanifin or Tanev so I am not so sure that Conroy will get that much? If offered he likely should take it even if he has to retain 50%.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 05:20 PM   #12435
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I just don't like Easton Cowan.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-13-2025, 05:20 PM   #12436
The Yen Man
Franchise Player
 
The Yen Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post
How long did you expect it to take?

Weak prospect pool? Could there have been more, sure, I guess. There probably could have been less. These complaints don’t mean anything. If your point is the Flames had no good prospects (they did btw) then what were they sacrificing in their place? Should the Flames have sat back and not traded for Toffoli (as an example)? Should they have traded Tkachuck, Gaudreau, Bennett, Monahan, Giordano, Brodie etc and not tried to win? Just stay in a perpetual state of rebuild for ……?

Not sure what the concern is on your second paragraph. Nothing to see here. I’d de surprised and disappointed if Conroy isn’t extended and I don’t see any reason why he wouldn’t be. I think the concern being raised recently is just empty chatter with not much else to discuss right now.

Treliving was trying to put a competitive team on the ice and at certain points, he did.
I'd expect it to take more than 2 years. Last year as an anomaly as the team remained competitive despite Conroy gutting a big core of the team the previous year, so it stalled the rebuild. I think now that Flames have hit rock bottom, Conroy proceeds with his rebuild plan.

Honestly, for a rebuild like this, I think it'll take 5 years before Flames are competitive. Right now, I'd say we're in year 2.
The Yen Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 05:22 PM   #12437
Royle9
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
I just don't like Easton Cowan.
More of what we have in undersized bottom 6 forwards.
He certainly doesn’t move our needle at all.

Far more appetizing forward prospects on other teams that would likely take a run at Rasmus.
Royle9 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Royle9 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-13-2025, 05:28 PM   #12438
HitterD
Powerplay Quarterback
 
HitterD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In my office...is it 5:00 yet???
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Royle9 View Post
More of what we have in undersized bottom 6 forwards.
He certainly doesn’t move our needle at all.

Far more appetizing forward prospects on other teams that would likely take a run at Rasmus.
If the rumour is true that the Leafs are making a strong push for Andersson now (big if though and you would know better than I), then it might be put up or shut up time for the other teams that have been sitting on their hands since the summer waiting for Conroy to lower his ask.
HitterD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2025, 05:32 PM   #12439
D as in David
Franchise Player
 
D as in David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

I don't know much about Cowan but he sure seemed to excel in his last two playoffs series in the OHL where he scored at a 2.08pts/game over those two playoffs. The highest scorer on his team both times, as well.
__________________
"9 out of 10 concerns are completely unfounded."

"The first thing that goes when you lose your hands, are your fine motor skills."
D as in David is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to D as in David For This Useful Post:
Old 11-13-2025, 05:36 PM   #12440
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
How so?

I must be missing something.

After moving Monahan to sign Kadri and having many excited about his amazing summer he made three more trades before leaving.

A nobody in for futures
Dryden Hunt for Zahorna
And the crazy Ritchie brothers deal
The Kadri trade/signing and the Huberdeau deal itself were the last ditch attempt to hit and run

Anyway, the Flames is the front runner for McKenna, big thanks to the wizard
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:00 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy