11-03-2025, 04:29 PM
|
#28041
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: wearing raccoons for boots
|
https://web-cdn.bsky.app/profile/mbe.../3m4qpan44ec2l
This morning at the Standing Committee on Legislative Offices...UCP majority introduces a motion starting a search committee for a new auditor general.
NDP MLA David Sheppard says Doug Wylie wants to stay on two more years. Wylie is reviewing the allegations of inappropriate health contracting.
UCP MLA Scott Cyr says Wylie could always reapply for his job. The five UCP MLAs on the committee pass the motion: Cyr, Lovely, De Jong, Dyck, Petrovic.
The four NDP MLAs on the committee vote it down: Sheppard, Miyashiro, Wright and Chapman.
FYI his term is currently set until April of 2026
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to puffnstuff For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-03-2025, 04:42 PM
|
#28042
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by puffnstuff
https://web-cdn.bsky.app/profile/mbe.../3m4qpan44ec2l
This morning at the Standing Committee on Legislative Offices...UCP majority introduces a motion starting a search committee for a new auditor general.
NDP MLA David Sheppard says Doug Wylie wants to stay on two more years. Wylie is reviewing the allegations of inappropriate health contracting.
UCP MLA Scott Cyr says Wylie could always reapply for his job. The five UCP MLAs on the committee pass the motion: Cyr, Lovely, De Jong, Dyck, Petrovic.
The four NDP MLAs on the committee vote it down: Sheppard, Miyashiro, Wright and Chapman.
FYI his term is currently set until April of 2026
|
Is this something to be concerned about or just a regular course of business for the government? It's great that Wylie would like an additional two years but since 1986 the AG has regularly served an 8 year term and the AG Act states that the term shall not exceed 8 years.
|
|
|
11-03-2025, 04:46 PM
|
#28043
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
I think it's only fair the Premier, who is responsible for all of this, should personally have to sit at the back of her train car and count and validate every signature herself. A camera can monitor her, and the citizens can make sure she isn't cheating.
This was her idea, her expense, and her failure that got us here. Let her be the one who has to suffer. Taking tax dollars form the vulnerable(which is exactly where they'll find it) to pay for this is not acceptable.
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-03-2025, 04:56 PM
|
#28044
|
|
Not a casual user
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
I think it's only fair the Premier, who is responsible for all of this, should personally have to sit at the back of her train car and count and validate every signature herself. A camera can monitor her, and the citizens can make sure she isn't cheating.
This was her idea, her expense, and her failure that got us here. Let her be the one who has to suffer. Taking tax dollars form the vulnerable(which is exactly where they'll find it) to pay for this is not acceptable.
|
Since I live in High River I'd be happy to supervise as she counts the votes. As long as i could have one of them long wooden pointers with a rubber tip so I can rap her hands when she tries to skip over some votes.
__________________
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dion For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-03-2025, 05:06 PM
|
#28045
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV
Par for the course. Fascists aren't going to give up power to democratic institutions, even ones of their own making.
|
I hope Elections Alberta finds a way to punish the UCP for this.
For example, I hope they prioritize the recall petitions over the FC petition. As much as we want the FC petition to move ahead, it is also effective in blocking the separatist question if it just sits with Election Alberta for a few years to slowly count the signatures.
The recall petitions should be counted with urgency so that Elections Alberta can get away from this nonsense.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Wolven For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-03-2025, 05:29 PM
|
#28046
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
I wonder if they can use volunteers to do the validating? How do they vet the validators?
|
|
|
11-03-2025, 05:36 PM
|
#28047
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geraldsh
I wonder if they can use volunteers to do the validating? How do they vet the validators?
|
I assume by who they intend on voting for...
|
|
|
11-03-2025, 06:16 PM
|
#28048
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaronck
I assume by who they intend on voting for...
|
That is quite the insinuation against Elections Alberta.
|
|
|
11-03-2025, 07:35 PM
|
#28049
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist
Is this something to be concerned about or just a regular course of business for the government? It's great that Wylie would like an additional two years but since 1986 the AG has regularly served an 8 year term and the AG Act states that the term shall not exceed 8 years.
|
Yes the initial appointment may not exceed 8 years, but they are eligible for reappointment.
Quote:
(2) Subject to section 5, the Lieutenant Governor in Council shall
appoint the Auditor General, on the recommendation of the
Assembly, for a term not exceeding 8 years.
(3) An Auditor General is eligible for reappointment under
subsection (2).
|
So it may not be unreasonable to form the committee to recommend the next appointment, it might also be reasonable to simply recommend reappointment given the ongoing scandals. But it will probably be hard to ever find an opportune break amidst the many many scandals that calgarygeologist is somehow not completely embarrassed about. (seriously, how are you not so ashamed of your party?)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:22 PM.
|
|