Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-22-2025, 11:21 PM   #81
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manhattanboy View Post
3 on 3 man.

And yeah wouldn’t it have been great if tonight he started Zary, Coronato and Parekh in the OT and said just said giver guys go for the win.

No we start a slow 36 year old centre and a D who doesn’t even want to be here against their youngsters.
Yes, 3-on-3... it's late.

In extra time you'd think you would coach for the second point, rather than whatever that strategy was. Trying for the shootout?
__________________

Last edited by TrentCrimmIndependent; 10-22-2025 at 11:23 PM.
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2025, 11:26 PM   #82
Beninho
Franchise Player
 
Beninho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: San Francisco
Exp:
Default

Huska is not a coach you rebuild with, they could be 3-20 and he still will play Weegar 25 minutes while benching Parekh. Management is going to have to force him to play the kids by trading most of the vets
Beninho is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Beninho For This Useful Post:
Old 10-22-2025, 11:26 PM   #83
Lewis_D
Scoring Winger
 
Lewis_D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Victoria, BC
Exp:
Default

Lewis_D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2025, 11:30 PM   #84
jg13
Franchise Player
 
jg13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

We're in a weird spot right now. Does Conroy try to move futures to try to save the season? I certainly hope not. Is everyone on the table after 3-4 more losses in the next 7 days? Hopefully. Is the plan to role with Huska no matter how bad things get because he signed an extension a few weeks ago?

Going to be an interesting next week or so @jets, rangers, @leafs, @sens

Last edited by jg13; 10-22-2025 at 11:40 PM.
jg13 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2025, 11:33 PM   #85
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beninho View Post
Huska is not a coach you rebuild with, they could be 3-20 and he still will play Weegar 25 minutes while benching Parekh. Management is going to have to force him to play the kids by trading most of the vets
Weegar vs Parekh is the wrong dichotomy here... when they should probably be a pairing.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
Old 10-22-2025, 11:33 PM   #86
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Yeah any team would play Weegar a lot
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2025, 11:40 PM   #87
NewFan
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

I think Weegar is too slow in PP1. Holding the puck and let the PK set their position and all passing lane is blocked.
NewFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2025, 11:40 PM   #88
Beninho
Franchise Player
 
Beninho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: San Francisco
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
Weegar vs Parekh is the wrong dichotomy here... when they should probably be a pairing.
Not comparing the two. Just highlighting that Weegar shouldn’t be playing 27 minutes because the coach is too scared to let Parekh play in different situations.

I agree they should be a pairing, it reminds me when the Flames saddled Sam Bennett with 4th liners and wondered why he didn’t have sustained success.
Beninho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2025, 11:43 PM   #89
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Yeah any team would play Weegar a lot
Just not on PP1.
__________________
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2025, 11:49 PM   #90
Titan2
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Titan2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: On the cusp
Exp:
lanny

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
We're 1 point up on last and have played 2 more games than San Jose.
Thank god for games in hand?
__________________
E=NG
Titan2 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Titan2 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-22-2025, 11:49 PM   #91
Rhett44
First Line Centre
 
Rhett44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
You keep saying this like it actually happened...there was one breakaway in the third that was a missed pass that bounced off the end boards right to their guy. Wolf made an incredible save. There was a partial break away short handed.

Flames allowed way too much in the first but after that didn't allow a ton TBH. Not breakaways though, slot shots were too high. Do you know what a breakaway is?
The point being that Wolf was incredible, and we got dominated until the last few minutes of the second. It easily could have been 5-0 by the end of the 2nd, and they said the exact same thing on After Burner. Yet the scoring chances show more for the Flames.

I hate the expected goals stat. It really does not take into account how poor the defense is playing on the play.
Rhett44 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rhett44 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-23-2025, 12:13 AM   #92
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhett44 View Post
The point being that Wolf was incredible, and we got dominated until the last few minutes of the second. It easily could have been 5-0 by the end of the 2nd, and they said the exact same thing on After Burner. Yet the scoring chances show more for the Flames.

I hate the expected goals stat. It really does not take into account how poor the defense is playing on the play.
You hate a number?
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2025, 12:20 AM   #93
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
You hate a number?

Be better

He clearly sees the flaw in the stat and is able to discount the way many people rely on it as an indicator of “expected goals”
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DeluxeMoustache For This Useful Post:
Old 10-23-2025, 12:23 AM   #94
Buff
Franchise Player
 
Buff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
Exp:
Default

TOI:

Weegar - 27:46
Kadri - 22:46
Andersson - 22:41
Coronato - 21:50
Huberdeau - 20:55
Bahl - 20:42
Coleman - 19:50
Bean - 19:41
Backlund - 19:39
Farabee - 15:32
Frost - 12:59
Parekh - 12:42
Zary - 12:12
Hanley - 12:08
Klapka - 10:00
Honzek - 9:39
Kirkland - 8:51
Lomberg - 8:26


The bolded in Red is alarming to me.
The bolded in Black is frustrating to me.


These are the reasons I'm not going to watch. It is not because they're losing it is because they're not giving some players more ice time to show what they can do.


I'm excited to watch some of these guys but their ice time is limited and they're not being used in situations that will help them develop. They lose interest and don't develop as well as hoped if they aren't used in situations that use their natural talents and abilities. Then the fans lose interest. It has been said that the owners are scared of another Young Guns era... well, they're developing these players to be the same as the "Young Guns" from the Young Guns era.
Buff is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Buff For This Useful Post:
Old 10-23-2025, 12:45 AM   #95
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
Be better

He clearly sees the flaw in the stat and is able to discount the way many people rely on it as an indicator of “expected goals”
he sees a flaw in any stat that doesn't support his narrative...Flames did give up too much in the first. They barely gave up anything beyond. They certainly didn't give up a ton of breakaways.

Flames were not dominated in the 2nd period come on now. "It could have been 5-0" Flames hit a post and barely missed an EN if we are talking couldas

Wolf was really good, so was their guy
__________________
GFG

Last edited by dino7c; 10-23-2025 at 12:49 AM.
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2025, 01:18 AM   #96
Goriders
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrentCrimmIndependent View Post
Kerins is yet again leading the Wranglers offensively.

If the well remains dry for another couple games, maybe its worth giving him another look.

They've really put him through the ringer for how diligently he has worked and produced. Playing all the preseason games and having an off night at the end only to have that be your demise is kind of unfair.

Many players that remained with the team have done little with the opportunity.

They need a shake up. Injecting a guy who is feeling it may help.
Seems to be a pattern. Young guys get one off night and thet get launched. Vets get a whole season to play like garbage and they get an extension.

Need to start dumping that philosophy soon.
Goriders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2025, 01:22 AM   #97
Goriders
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caboose View Post
I'm betting we'll see a switch to letting the young guys run the show in a couple weeks or so. Huska is taking some heat around here, but he and the team started the season aiming for playoffs, as they should. I think we're getting close to the point where the management and coaches can say "well, we tried" and embrace the lost season via playing time and personnel changes.

I don't get the negativity from some posters. The Flames are gonna get a high draft pick at this rate, and that seems pretty great to me! Should be an interesting season since playoffs look extremely unlikely lol



Sent from my Pixel 8 using Tapatalk
Lose to the Jets and Rangers and they’ll need to play at a 0.66 clip to get in.

That will never happen. It’s almost over.
Goriders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2025, 01:51 AM   #98
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
Be better

He clearly sees the flaw in the stat and is able to discount the way many people rely on it as an indicator of “expected goals”
Be better? lol

Try again.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2025, 04:58 AM   #99
FireGilbert
Franchise Player
 
FireGilbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Brisbane
Exp:
Default

Not in last place for at least a day!

Maybe Huska’s worst game as their coach. For someone who usually rolls lines was odd to see so much extra time for the veterans and his boneheaded OT lineup lost the game.

Was funny late in the 3rd when Hrudey named the goalies as his players of the game and the Wolf highlights were all breakaways while the Dobes ones were slappers from the outside. The Klapka goal was the first even strength goal from a Flames forward in 14 periods! Maybe the saddest stretch of Flames games I’ve ever seen. The Young Guns era was close to unwatchable but at least they had Fleury and then Iginla providing excitement.
__________________
The masses of humanity have always had to surf.
FireGilbert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2025, 05:15 AM   #100
Rhett44
First Line Centre
 
Rhett44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
he sees a flaw in any stat that doesn't support his narrative...Flames did give up too much in the first. They barely gave up anything beyond. They certainly didn't give up a ton of breakaways.

Flames were not dominated in the 2nd period come on now. "It could have been 5-0" Flames hit a post and barely missed an EN if we are talking couldas

Wolf was really good, so was their guy
You and a couple others on here are the biggest Homer fans I have seen in any sport. There is no shot that you can watch last night's game and think it was a close game scoring chance wise. We bled scoring chances most of the game.

I have a friend who is a Habs fan who messaged me after saying Wolf is the closest goalie he has seen to Carey Price and asking how we were able to steal a point. Wolf played incredible, the other goalie played good (but it is the Flames, all goalies look good against us).

If someone watched last night's game and came to any other conclusion than Wolf stole us a point, I don't even know what to tell you. Because you need glasses or you are being extremely biased.
Rhett44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:35 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy