10-10-2025, 07:32 AM
|
#6021
|
First Line Centre
|
Many of us complain about the state of politics as being too much gamesmanship and not enough getting about the business of getting stuff done, especially at the municipal level. I don't really know what Farkas will be but I do know he is continuing his trend of mostly style over substance, politicking over leading. That can certainly be useful in certain situations but I think less so at the municipal level. The UCP wants cities to be politicized. It fits their long-term agenda for making Alberta into a more American-like state (if not actually American).
I don't know if I'm going to vote for Gondek or Thiessen at this point but I do know that Farkas is not an option.
|
|
|
10-10-2025, 09:03 AM
|
#6022
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Mayor's debate on Ryan Jespersen Real Talk this morning if anyone interested. Gondek and Thiessen seem like the clear winners so far.
__________________
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to FacePaint For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-10-2025, 09:31 AM
|
#6023
|
Farm Team Player
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp: 
|
I ended up voting for Thiessen in the end. It seems from the debates to date, as well as the platform that he's the most competent even if he has some flaws. I hope it'll end up being a situation where he comes from behind and wins as all the other candidates have larger warts than him. Quite honestly any vote that isn't for Sharp is probably a good one.
I also voted for DJ Kelly, so not happy with voting for two people in the same "party" but I truly believe in discussions with DJ that there won't be any party line and he'll vote and do what is best for ward 4.
Also obviously voted for and even donated to Laura Hack, but am worried that "Dr." Joanny is going to win with how many signs she has in comparison to Hack where people will just vote for the name they know.
|
|
|
10-10-2025, 09:35 AM
|
#6024
|
Loves Teh Chat!
|
I know everyone hates parties, but really, if you want to send a message to Smith, the most effective way to do so is to vote in the Calgary Party because she'd be fuming mad about a slate of centrists/progressives instead of the right wing slate.
Looks like Thiessen is finally getting some late attention, I wonder if it will be enough but realistically think it's too late. I'm torn between him and Gondek. Don't fully buy the Farkas transformation.
Last edited by Torture; 10-10-2025 at 09:45 AM.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Torture For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-10-2025, 10:11 AM
|
#6025
|
#1 Goaltender
|
we're gonna split everything between Gondek and Thiessen and end up with Farkas/Sharp aren't we
|
|
|
10-10-2025, 10:13 AM
|
#6026
|
Loves Teh Chat!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inglewood Jack
we're gonna split everything between Gondek and Thiessen and end up with Farkas/Sharp aren't we
|
Probably. That's why I'm leaning Gondek.
|
|
|
10-10-2025, 10:25 AM
|
#6027
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Wouldn't they be splitting based on the same thinking?
Vote for whomever best reflects your values and give that person a push through your network.
|
|
|
10-10-2025, 10:33 AM
|
#6028
|
All I can get
|
What happened to Gondek during the covid restrictions was truly despicable -- people camped outside her residence harassing her family and neighbours. Add in the vicious "Recall" smear campaign that wasn't even legitimate and mysteriously funded.
I give her a lot of credit for not backing down and running again. You may have some policy quibbles but essentially a mayor is one vote on council.
__________________
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
|
|
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Reggie Dunlop For This Useful Post:
|
BeltlineFan,
craigwd,
FacePaint,
Fuzz,
getbak,
Looch City,
MrButtons,
powderjunkie,
Swift,
topfiverecords,
Torture
|
10-10-2025, 10:57 AM
|
#6030
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Janet Brown is usually very reliable polling wise, based on that why even bother voting for Thiessen if you don't want Sharp or Farkas. You gotta go Gondek.
He's not going to pull off a 2010 Nenshi scenario, by this time in 2010 Nenshi was already well in the mix and building momentum. I just don't see it happening with Thiessen.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bigtime For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-10-2025, 11:25 AM
|
#6031
|
Uncle Chester
|
Yeah, based on those poll numbers, if you were trying to decide between Gondek or Thiessen, you probably should cast your ballot for Gondek. Hopefully Thiessen runs and gets more support next election.
|
|
|
10-10-2025, 11:28 AM
|
#6032
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaws
|
That pretty much solidifies me for Farkas this time around - I really don't want Sharp.
|
|
|
10-10-2025, 11:31 AM
|
#6033
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
|
Thiessen needs a bit more air time, I think. This election is the first I had heard of him. Not sure if I should have before?
|
|
|
10-10-2025, 11:41 AM
|
#6034
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius
Thiessen needs a bit more air time, I think. This election is the first I had heard of him. Not sure if I should have before?
|
I have known Brian for a long time. He was always politically involved, and if I recall correctly, ran as a liberal candidate (federally?) a while back when there was a zero percent chance of winning. I think some may knock him for being middle-of-the-road, but I do think politically, he really is a centrist liberal.
I have no insider knowledge, but I suspect that him starting the Calgary Party was a response to a veiled UCP municipal party running, rather than endorsing this form of politics. As it turns out, I don't think the party aspect of this years' campaign really made any (positive) difference.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|
|
|
10-10-2025, 12:15 PM
|
#6035
|
Farm Team Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86
That pretty much solidifies me for Farkas this time around - I really don't want Sharp.
|
That’s exactly where I’m at too. I’m not happy with Gondek’s performance as mayor, and I really don’t want Sharp.
Considered voting for Thiessen but he’s polling too low.
I’m willing to give Farkas a chance. I do think he has changed and grown since losing the mayoral race 4 years ago, though I know many are skeptical. I voted Gondek last time as the anti-Farkas option.
Some reasons why I’m not voting for Gondek: - Let the 2019 arena agreement collapse due to $10M road/sidewalk and climate mitigation costs. New deal is much worse for taxpayers
- Poor / confusing communications during water main crisis
- Declaring climate emergency as first major priority after getting elected
- Supported pitching up to $100,000 of City money toward the legal fight against Quebec’s Bill 21
- Along with council, passed Single-use items bylaw which was then repealed due to massive unpopularity
- Marda Loop businesses have been struggling for a couple of years due to prolonged “Main Streets” construction. This past summer (with construction almost complete) another business announced it was shutting down, and only then did she publicly announce that she wanted to meet with affected businesses to hear their concerns
Last edited by Jaws; 10-10-2025 at 12:35 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jaws For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-10-2025, 12:27 PM
|
#6036
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaws
That’s exactly where I’m at too. I’m not happy with Gondek’s performance as mayor, and I really don’t want Sharp.
Considered voting for Thiessen but he’s polling too low.
I’m willing to give Farkas a chance. I do think he has changed and grown since losing the mayoral race 4 years ago, though I know many are skeptical. I voted Gondek last time as the anti-Farkas option.
Some reasons why I’m not voting for Gondek: - Let the 2019 arena agreement collapse due to $10M road/sidewalk and climate mitigation costs. New deal is much worse for taxpayers
- Poor / confusing communications during water main crisis
- Declaring climate emergency as first major priority after getting elected
- Supported pitching up to $100,000 of City money toward the legal fight against Quebec’s Bill 21
- Along with council, passed Single-use items bylaw which was then repealed due to massive unpopularity
|
The biggest issue for me is she got absolutely steamrolled by the province on the Green Line. We need someone with more backbone to stand up to the UCP going forward.
|
|
|
10-10-2025, 12:38 PM
|
#6037
|
Farm Team Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86
The biggest issue for me is she got absolutely steamrolled by the province on the Green Line. We need someone with more backbone to stand up to the UCP going forward.
|
I agree with you on that.
Do you think Farkas can stand up to the UCP?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jaws For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-10-2025, 12:43 PM
|
#6038
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: wearing raccoons for boots
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86
The biggest issue for me is she got absolutely steamrolled by the province on the Green Line. We need someone with more backbone to stand up to the UCP going forward.
|
Curious what you think the City or Gondek could have done to change what the ucp did...and are doing?
|
|
|
10-10-2025, 01:11 PM
|
#6039
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Yeah, if people on the more "moderate" or "progressive" side are all putting their votes in the 3 bucks of Gondek, Farkas, or Thiessen, then we could wind up with Sharp due to that spread. Though I do know a considerable amount of business owner type individuals who have been pushing hard for Davison.
I think I'm going Gondek (Mayor), Joey (councillor), and Jenny Regal (trustee) for Ward 1.
|
|
|
10-10-2025, 01:15 PM
|
#6040
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86
The biggest issue for me is she got absolutely steamrolled by the province on the Green Line. We need someone with more backbone to stand up to the UCP going forward.
|
I'm in the minority where I'm actually on the pronvince's side in regards to the green line. After over a decade of back and forth in new plans that are more expensive, and provide less track just to accommodate the downtown subway, enough was enough and the pivot to Plan B had to happen. The value wasn't there for the last subway iteration in comparison to alternatives (same alignment but elevated) that were never truly considered.
I'm not a fan of how we got to that point, and Smith/UCP bullied the city into it, but ultimately the city ignored the red flags that have been popping up over the duration of this project, and not prepare for an alternative plan if the value of the subway could no longer be deemed feasible.
They had tunnel vision (pun intended). It was that or nothing.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:37 PM.
|
|