Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-26-2025, 11:07 AM   #9401
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
I said it months ago and I will say it again now, if Conroy doesn't get his asking price for Andersson he will give him the contract Rasmus wants to stay. They can always revisit a trade down the road. Don't go into this thinking Andersson has to be traded for pennies on the dollar, Conroy will absolutely get a contract done with him if the market is not there right now.
A contract based on Andersson’s play last season? Or the two seasons before that? Because those would be different contracts.

Andersson’s play over the next half season is going to go a long way to determining his value, both for his contract and in the trade market.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2025, 11:13 AM   #9402
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
A contract based on Andersson’s play last season? Or the two seasons before that? Because those would be different contracts.

Andersson’s play over the next half season is going to go a long way to determining his value, both for his contract and in the trade market.
Exactly. That's why I said if this go to the trade deadline and Andersson has another season like last year his salary demands won't be as high and they will get a deal done. If he plays like prime time Andersson then Conroy will get his price. Personally I hope he has a great start and we can get the value we want for him but I would rather sign him at a more reasonable rate then give him away
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2025, 11:14 AM   #9403
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
He wouldn’t, because any player who has played an NHL game is ineligible according to their criteria. It has nothing to do with who he plays for.
If Parekh had been picked by Edmonton, Toronto, or Montreal, they would have used different criteria that allowed them to include him.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2025, 11:15 AM   #9404
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Royle9 View Post
Reinbacher (MTL) down for 4-5 weeks with hand injury sustained last night
Kid seems a bit unlucky. Their version of Honzek.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2025, 11:19 AM   #9405
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
If Parekh had been picked by Edmonton, Toronto, or Montreal, they would have used different criteria that allowed them to include him.
No that doesn't hold because Demidov is excluded because of the criteria.
The list is bad.
But not because there is some sort of grudge against the Flames.
It's a bad list because the criteria is bad.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2025, 11:25 AM   #9406
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
He wouldn’t, because any player who has played an NHL game is ineligible according to their criteria. It has nothing to do with who he plays for.
Real lame way of making a list of best prospects and young players. Any really good prospects will get at least some playing time pretty soon after their draft. It's basically a list of the mediocre top prospects under 23.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2025, 11:25 AM   #9407
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Exactly. That's why I said if this go to the trade deadline and Andersson has another season like last year his salary demands won't be as high and they will get a deal done. If he plays like prime time Andersson then Conroy will get his price. Personally I hope he has a great start and we can get the value we want for him but I would rather sign him at a more reasonable rate then give him away
As much as many here won’t like it, I think you’re pretty close to being right on this.

Rightly or wrongly, I think Conroy puts a lot of value on home grown guys, especially ones who want to stick around.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2025, 11:26 AM   #9408
Tbull8
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

Any waiver news yet?
Tbull8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2025, 12:27 PM   #9409
InternationalVillager
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
No that doesn't hold because Demidov is excluded because of the criteria.
The list is bad.
But not because there is some sort of grudge against the Flames.
It's a bad list because the criteria is bad.
Correlation and causation.
InternationalVillager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2025, 12:31 PM   #9410
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Royle9 View Post
Reinbacher (MTL) down for 4-5 weeks with hand injury sustained last night
Hello Kent, can we interest you in a lightly used Miromanov or even a Jake Bean?
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2025, 12:37 PM   #9411
howard_the_duck
#1 Goaltender
 
howard_the_duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I would hope Andersson’s play this season has little to no bearing on keeping him. A good half season doesn’t change that he’ll be 30 when his new contract kicks in. Unless he comes down on years I don’t see Conroy going to 8 either for Ras, which is the only way I see him staying in Calgary.
howard_the_duck is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to howard_the_duck For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2025, 12:55 PM   #9412
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
He wouldn’t, because any player who has played an NHL game is ineligible according to their criteria. It has nothing to do with who he plays for.
The criteria certainly seems cherry picked to include a certain player...like under 23 and no NHL games is a pretty odd criteria to say the least. Howard didn't get any games because Tampa didn't think he was good enough.
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2025, 01:00 PM   #9413
Ped
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Howard doesn't belong anywhere on that list, but Tampa wanted to sign him. He had no interest in them.
Ped is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2025, 01:01 PM   #9414
NegativeSpace
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Exp:
Default

I guess that I always assumed that the Roger's connection to Toronto and Edmonton meant that they got more airtime. Montreal has its own dedicated views. The rest of the Canadian teams scratch for the remaining eyeballs.
NegativeSpace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2025, 01:01 PM   #9415
Sofa GM
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ped View Post
Howard doesn't belong anywhere on that list, but Tampa wanted to sign him. He had no interest in them.
Howard wouldn’t sign because they wouldn’t guarantee him a roster spot, he would have had to earn it. He wouldn’t be good enough to play on that roster.
Sofa GM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sofa GM For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2025, 03:18 PM   #9416
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Exactly. That's why I said if this go to the trade deadline and Andersson has another season like last year his salary demands won't be as high and they will get a deal done. If he plays like prime time Andersson then Conroy will get his price. Personally I hope he has a great start and we can get the value we want for him but I would rather sign him at a more reasonable rate then give him away
That's basically where I am at with the whole situation.

a) Andersson is held on, and with injuries (like the major ones around the league we have been seeing thus far), we can sell him high to a contending team that is desperate to keep their team afloat. Retention also can be maximized with the new LTIR rules

b) Andersson plays a decent season and earns the contract he wants to stay with the Flames at 8 years. No other team is able to give him that extra year right now. So, we do have that advantage. With the cap going up significantly over the next few years, if you can lock up Andersson around 7.5-8.5m, I think that is a fair price for a top end #3 defenseman. I say #3 because down the road I would hope Parekh is the top pairing RD for Calgary.
ForeverFlameFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2025, 03:30 PM   #9417
Major Major
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

I wonder if things go well for team and player this year, could there be mutual interest in a shorter term extension?

Say 3 years at 10.5. It's a way to actually use the unused cap space we keep hearing that conny wants to use in order to keep the term short for an aging player. Ras makes 6-10 million above market for the term of the contract and can still sign another longish deal at age 32.
Major Major is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Major Major For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2025, 03:32 PM   #9418
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Major View Post
I wonder if things go well for team and player this year, could there be mutual interest in a shorter term extension?

Say 3 years at 10.5. It's a way to actually use the unused cap space we keep hearing that conny wants to use in order to keep the term short for an aging player. Ras makes 6-10 million above market for the term of the contract and can still sign another longish deal at age 32.
Overpaying one player is never good for a team. It kills morale and creates all sorts of issues. I also can't see this ownership group doing that. From their perspective, they're more concerned with actual money spent every year.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2025, 03:33 PM   #9419
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ped View Post
Howard doesn't belong anywhere on that list, but Tampa wanted to sign him. He had no interest in them.
because he wanted a guranteed spot and they told him to pound sand...he had no interest because they had too many good wingers for him to make it.
__________________
GFG

Last edited by dino7c; 09-26-2025 at 03:40 PM.
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2025, 03:52 PM   #9420
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
The criteria certainly seems cherry picked to include a certain player...like under 23 and no NHL games is a pretty odd criteria to say the least.


NHL sportswriters don’t sit around dreaming up ways to disrespect the Flames. You can be a fan without embracing paranoid victim-complex.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:01 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy