08-08-2025, 06:51 AM
|
#27221
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer
Yes, it makes financial sense for corporations to do that. But it makes more sense for albertans to have high paying jobs when possible.
|
Not really in this case, moving refined products in mixed products pipelines is a pita and it really is best to keep the molecule whole and move it to market that way.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Whynotnow For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-08-2025, 09:22 AM
|
#27222
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer
Yes, it makes financial sense for corporations to do that. But it makes more sense for albertans to have high paying jobs when possible.
|
Albertans can move to Ontario and give them a taste of their of medicine.
|
|
|
08-08-2025, 10:39 AM
|
#27223
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Refined products at a refinery is a lot more than just turning crude oil into gasoline.
Gasoline
Jet Fuel
Diesel
Asphalt
Lubricant
Each one requires different supply chains going to different locations with different shipping methods and transportation regulations.
There's a reason why refineries are mostly in Texas or ports in Canada (number of refineries are far away from any crude oil source).
The highest concentration of refineries in the US are all along the gulf coast or the Great Lakes. Coincidentally, many refineries are located near high population areas.
An agreement to ship oil from Alberta to refineries in Ontario makes perfect sense, as that is where the refineries are, and subsequently where many people using said products live.
All that said, the question of "Ontario has tidewater ports"? is a legitimate question, and what is omitted from the Alberta press release is Smith and Ford are planning to build a tidewater port in James Bay, and want to get pipelines and rail approved to get to it.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opin...a-surprise-to/
Sometimes the answer to the question is simpler than it is made out to be.
Last edited by Firebot; 08-08-2025 at 10:46 AM.
|
|
|
08-08-2025, 11:27 AM
|
#27224
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Isn't the useablity of a tidewater port in James Bay limited by seasonal ice? And then there's the water depth as well.
|
|
|
08-08-2025, 11:36 AM
|
#27225
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
Ice might not be an issue by the time the port is ready.
|
|
|
08-08-2025, 11:37 AM
|
#27226
|
Franchise Player
|
James Bay has had an open waterway for a while now, during winter (if I remember correctly). It still has all of the dangers associated with a sudden prolonged shift in weather, or a drifting iceberg, or any number of things.
I would have to assume that there has been some thought into how they manipulate winter. Icebreaker lead boats? I don't know, but they seem confident.
Also, I think that the pipelines to refineries in Ontario are for domestic use and not export, but it could be that I read that wrong.
Shangri-la would be a pipeline to New Brunswick.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Harry Lime For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-08-2025, 03:31 PM
|
#27227
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Lime
James Bay has had an open waterway for a while now, during winter (if I remember correctly). It still has all of the dangers associated with a sudden prolonged shift in weather, or a drifting iceberg, or any number of things.
I would have to assume that there has been some thought into how they manipulate winter. Icebreaker lead boats? I don't know, but they seem confident.
Also, I think that the pipelines to refineries in Ontario are for domestic use and not export, but it could be that I read that wrong.
Shangri-la would be a pipeline to New Brunswick.
|
once you've built a pipe to James Bay the pipeline to the St Lawrence isn't that far though
|
|
|
08-08-2025, 03:37 PM
|
#27228
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by afc wimbledon
once you've built a pipe to James Bay the pipeline to the St Lawrence isn't that far though
|
But again, no one is going to export significant quantities of oil out the seaway, for reasons already discussed. The only reason you continue the pipeline south is to feed the southern Ontario refineries, which are currently mostly supplied by Enbridge Line 3. And you only do that if you are worried about the US, which can change in the future.
|
|
|
08-09-2025, 02:39 PM
|
#27229
|
Franchise Player
|
Would the line be a straight shot from the oilfields in Northern AB to James Bay? That is, north of Lakes Winnipeg and Manitoba?
__________________
"9 out of 10 concerns are completely unfounded."
"The first thing that goes when you lose your hands, are your fine motor skills."
|
|
|
08-09-2025, 03:26 PM
|
#27230
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
Doubtful. Probably head off from Hardisty terminal. Probably follow th TC mainline until almost directly south of James Bay, then head north. It's super remote and hard to access a lot of the shield area, so you would want to follow highway infrastructure.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-13-2025, 12:31 PM
|
#27231
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
The only rational conclusion here is that Rempel believes the Liberals didn't do enough to combat climate change.
Watching the far right lose their minds and dedicate endless radio hours and articles about a temporary safety measure has been pretty delicious. FREEDIM! They wail.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-13-2025, 01:35 PM
|
#27232
|
Franchise Player
|
Remplestiltskin!!
She has been so absent, I forgot she was still a MP.
__________________
Peter12 "I'm no Trump fan but he is smarter than most if not everyone in this thread. ”
|
|
|
08-13-2025, 02:38 PM
|
#27233
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
Doubtful. Probably head off from Hardisty terminal. Probably follow th TC mainline until almost directly south of James Bay, then head north. It's super remote and hard to access a lot of the shield area, so you would want to follow highway infrastructure.
|
Tank Farm and terminal in Manitoba where the original Keystone Line heads south.
Just a bit SW of Winnipeg I believe...Looked it up...Last Pumpstation before going south is at Portage La Prairie...
Go north from there as required.
__________________
Last edited by Nufy; 08-13-2025 at 02:43 PM.
|
|
|
08-13-2025, 06:30 PM
|
#27234
|
It's not easy being green!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: In the tubes to Vancouver Island
|
Stupid Libs.. why don't you control the weather better?
__________________
Who is in charge of this product and why haven't they been fired yet?
|
|
|
08-13-2025, 06:54 PM
|
#27235
|
Pent-up
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
The only rational conclusion here is that Rempel believes the Liberals didn't do enough to combat climate change.
Watching the far right lose their minds and dedicate endless radio hours and articles about a temporary safety measure has been pretty delicious. FREEDIM! They wail.
|
I overheard a whole group of people ranting about environmental lockdowns and “how’d we get here!?!?” Tonight. They blamed Covid and said people just go along with things now and Canadians would have revolted 10 years ago… sure.
|
|
|
08-13-2025, 07:39 PM
|
#27236
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
None of these people have probably ever even been in the woods. They wouldn't know what do do, would toss their cigarette, and haul ass outa there in their pickups.
These are not people we should be looking to for rational policy critique.
|
|
|
08-14-2025, 09:07 AM
|
#27237
|
Pent-up
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
|
Doug Ford mandating 4 days in the office per week for provincial employees. Gotta use that tax money on rent we didn’t need…
|
|
|
08-14-2025, 09:13 AM
|
#27238
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers
Doug Ford mandating 4 days in the office per week for provincial employees. Gotta use that tax money on rent we didn’t need…
|
At first I thought this was a mandate to introduce four day work weeks.
|
|
|
08-14-2025, 09:29 AM
|
#27239
|
Franchise Player
|
PPs new slogan. Block Baby Block.
Carney is coming for your tracks!! lol
Do the deplorables still lap this crap up?
__________________
Peter12 "I'm no Trump fan but he is smarter than most if not everyone in this thread. ”
|
|
|
08-14-2025, 09:33 AM
|
#27240
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers
Doug Ford mandating 4 days in the office per week for provincial employees. Gotta use that tax money on rent we didn’t need…
|
Since most of the real estate is owned or long term leased not really an issue, I actually support this, I don’t think we are thriving sitting in our basements all the time staring at screens,
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Whynotnow For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:07 AM.
|
|