Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-24-2025, 03:01 PM   #5981
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978 View Post
Is it silly? Is a late 1st worth so much more than a 2nd? I have 15 years of data that says that it's about 1-2% better and about 5% chance you get someone that is an impact player vs 3%. I think it is silly to hold out for an extra 1-2%.
If you know of an actual offer I'm happy to debate whether or not they should have taken it.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2025, 03:01 PM   #5982
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978 View Post
But you are also assuming that the Flames will budge on the other if it is less than the asking price even though Royle said the have a price set.
Why are you assuming the Flames are being rigid and making mistakes?
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2025, 03:05 PM   #5983
NegativeSpace
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Exp:
Default

This conversation strikes me as the difference between an auction approach or an asset value approach. The auction approach just says here's a player that the team doesn't want back and he goes to the best offer by this date. That approach is consistent with the posters who are in a panic to trade Rasmus before the season. I have written previously that my preference would be to have simply auctioned Rasmus off for the best offer this summer to whatever team will take him as a rental. However, if Conroy is not doing the auction approach then he simply cannot be seen to panic to have Rasmus return in season. He loses all leverage and will not get the asset's value at all. Whether Conroy has fairly judged the asset's value at this stage is impossible to tell until at minimum we see the price he is willing to accept (even then it is difficult unless there are leaks of alternative offers).
NegativeSpace is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NegativeSpace For This Useful Post:
Old 07-24-2025, 03:39 PM   #5984
442scotty
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Anyone notice that the kid watching the train pull away was wearing a blue and yellow back pack? Hmmm!
442scotty is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 442scotty For This Useful Post:
Old 07-24-2025, 03:49 PM   #5985
Sec214
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 442scotty View Post
Anyone notice that the kid watching the train pull away was wearing a blue and yellow back pack? Hmmm!
The details
__________________
Sec214 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Sec214 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-24-2025, 04:05 PM   #5986
Gordon Bombay
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Jun 2024
Exp:
Default

Andersson for Kyrou?
Gordon Bombay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2025, 04:10 PM   #5987
Icon
Franchise Player
 
Icon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gordon Bombay View Post
Andersson for Kyrou?
Start the car!
Icon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Icon For This Useful Post:
Old 07-24-2025, 04:12 PM   #5988
Tbull8
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

I take the blue and yellow just to be Swedish Rasmus being left behind and the team moving on
Tbull8 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Tbull8 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-24-2025, 04:42 PM   #5989
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Andersson+Coleman (both 50% retained) for Robertson
Zary for Rossi

Robertson-Kadri-Coronato
Huberdeau-Rossi-Sharangovich
Farabee-Frost-Pospisil
Lomberg-Backlund-Klapka

We would probably need to juice both offers. Would the Vegas 1st or Flames 2nd in the Dallas deal and Mews in the Wild deal be enough?
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2025, 05:02 PM   #5990
YyjFlames
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sec214 View Post
I don’t care what this means. It’s a fantastic gif. The cheeky monkey!
YyjFlames is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to YyjFlames For This Useful Post:
Old 07-24-2025, 05:06 PM   #5991
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Andersson+Coleman (both 50% retained) for Robertson
Zary for Rossi

Robertson-Kadri-Coronato
Huberdeau-Rossi-Sharangovich
Farabee-Frost-Pospisil
Lomberg-Backlund-Klapka

We would probably need to juice both offers. Would the Vegas 1st or Flames 2nd in the Dallas deal and Mews in the Wild deal be enough?
Would prefer to keep the picks, prospects and young roster players that the flames have. I’m fine using a retained Coleman to bolster the return on a trade and or take back a bad contract to bolster the return but I want to keep developing Zary and use that Vegas pick.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2025, 05:17 PM   #5992
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978 View Post
But that won't happen either. I'm sure they have been offered more already and have talked to many teams already that have beat that offer.

Ras stays, he needs to play. 24 mins a night and time on the PP. The gain of having him out for young players is valuable to me. I'm not just looking at the return alone.

Parekh needs to be on the PP and needs 18-20 a night, he is too good for the AHL or OHL.

Weegar gets 24

Bahl could use a bit more ice around 22 mins.

Ras here blocks other player opportunity. Him gone allows the team to explore starting with Kuznetsov and giving him 16-18 mins a night, if he struggles and depending on who is playing well in the AHL, it allows for other players to get a call throughout the season. This asset management/development is just as important as turning that 2nd to a 1st. Dallas 1st will not be in a range that gives you high end odds of hitting on a high-end prospect.

Now also could drive up the value of our own 1st. That is more important than the return for me. If the team plays well without him, more than likely a young player stepped in a played very well.

Ras is durable, but injuries are a factor in this situation. I also don't want to see contract talks restarted because the trade returns aren't as expected. Time to move on.
Well I hate to disappoint you but if Conroy does not get what he wants for Andersson by the trade deadline I fully expect him to give Andersson his 8 year deal to stay in Calgary. The Flames have the cap room and the player is open to staying. Conroy can play this as long as he wants because in the end he can sign him to that long term deal and negotiate a m-ntc in year 4 or something where they can revisit a trade. It isn't like Andersson is not a useful player that can help develop the younger D men or be an important cog moving forward. If he can't get proper value in a trade he can push it down the line without losing him for pennies on the dollar.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 07-24-2025, 05:22 PM   #5993
Rhett44
First Line Centre
 
Rhett44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Well I hate to disappoint you but if Conroy does not get what he wants for Andersson by the trade deadline I fully expect him to give Andersson his 8 year deal to stay in Calgary. The Flames have the cap room and the player is open to staying. Conroy can play this as long as he wants because in the end he can sign him to that long term deal and negotiate a m-ntc in year 4 or something where they can revisit a trade. It isn't like Andersson is not a useful player that can help develop the younger D men or be an important cog moving forward. If he can't get proper value in a trade he can push it down the line without losing him for pennies on the dollar.
It depends if Andersson wants to go to a contender though right? I believe he would have the final say.
Rhett44 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2025, 05:28 PM   #5994
Goriders
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Maybe Andersson’s mind will be swayed if the Flames go on a heater like the last 20 games of last season.
Goriders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2025, 05:30 PM   #5995
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhett44 View Post
It depends if Andersson wants to go to a contender though right? I believe he would have the final say.
Everything I have heard along with what Andersson has said is his preference is a long term deal with the Flames. I don't think people get how much Andersson loves Calgary. He believes the team is headed in the right direction. I have very little doubt if Conroy offered him what he asked for when they met he would put pen to paper tmrw. For Conroy he sees good future RD in the system coming and if he can move Andersson to improve the team in the long term or that fills other holes the team has he is going to look at that. This isn't a have to trade him scenario though or that the player wants out, the player wants a certain term and dollar figure the Flames are not willing to give him right now. That does not mean the door is closed on giving it to him at a further date down the road.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 07-24-2025, 05:32 PM   #5996
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Well I hate to disappoint you but if Conroy does not get what he wants for Andersson by the trade deadline I fully expect him to give Andersson his 8 year deal to stay in Calgary. The Flames have the cap room and the player is open to staying. Conroy can play this as long as he wants because in the end he can sign him to that long term deal and negotiate a m-ntc in year 4 or something where they can revisit a trade. It isn't like Andersson is not a useful player that can help develop the younger D men or be an important cog moving forward. If he can't get proper value in a trade he can push it down the line without losing him for pennies on the dollar.
That’s the smartest thing I've read here in weeks.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2025, 05:33 PM   #5997
Tbull8
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Everything I have heard along with what Andersson has said is his preference is a long term deal with the Flames. I don't think people get how much Andersson loves Calgary. He believes the team is headed in the right direction. I have very little doubt if Conroy offered him what he asked for when they met he would put pen to paper tmrw. For Conroy he sees good future RD in the system coming and if he can move Andersson to improve the team in the long term or that fills other holes the team has he is going to look at that. This isn't a have to trade him scenario though or that the player wants out, the player wants a certain term and dollar figure the Flames are not willing to give him right now. That does not mean the door is closed on giving it to him at a further date down the road.
If that’s the case, that’s a huge note on the flames trajectory and culture. A guy like Rasmus wanting to stay that badly reflects very well on the organization. I still think he gets moved and I hope he gets a cup out of it. Love the guy
Tbull8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2025, 05:42 PM   #5998
chedder
Franchise Player
 
chedder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Keeping Andersson and giving him $6 x 8 years would be great. He shouldn't be paid more than Weegar, even with the cap increase. I'm guessing he thinks he's worth $8 x 8 or more.
chedder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2025, 05:46 PM   #5999
Rhett44
First Line Centre
 
Rhett44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Everything I have heard along with what Andersson has said is his preference is a long term deal with the Flames. I don't think people get how much Andersson loves Calgary. He believes the team is headed in the right direction. I have very little doubt if Conroy offered him what he asked for when they met he would put pen to paper tmrw. For Conroy he sees good future RD in the system coming and if he can move Andersson to improve the team in the long term or that fills other holes the team has he is going to look at that. This isn't a have to trade him scenario though or that the player wants out, the player wants a certain term and dollar figure the Flames are not willing to give him right now. That does not mean the door is closed on giving it to him at a further date down the road.
I thought someone on here had reported that the relationship between Andersson and the Flames was poisoned after the Vegas thing came out. It is hard to keep up. Thank you for the information!
Rhett44 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2025, 05:53 PM   #6000
Sec214
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhett44 View Post
I thought someone on here had reported that the relationship between Andersson and the Flames was poisoned after the Vegas thing came out. It is hard to keep up. Thank you for the information!
If he wants to stay long term, that deal is sitting for him to sign it. Flames have made their respectful best offer. No its not market rate, no its not max term.

It's the old "hometown discount" many have and have not taken before him.
__________________
Sec214 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Sec214 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:38 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy