Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-12-2025, 11:23 AM   #4841
BigThief
First Line Centre
 
BigThief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
I'm sure he wanted to play for Sutter. But frankly having a trade request and then yanking it doesn't sit well with me anyway. Especially when the new coach is doing exactly what the old coach did.
.
Wanting to change jobs because of poor management then wanting to stay when a manager you like moves in... Doesn't sit well with you?

We have no idea if the new coach is doing the exact same stuff. If Sutter discussed Bennett's future with the team and that his role will expand that could make a person change their perspectives
BigThief is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BigThief For This Useful Post:
Old 06-12-2025, 11:25 AM   #4842
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
I think you're referring to me, as the low hockey IQ comment poster.

i agree with you 100%. The organization did not play Bennett to his strengths. As for Bennett having a low hockey IQ, scoring lots of goals does not mean you have a high hockey IQ. There have been guys who led the league in goals, who were totally unskilled in other aspects besides goal scoring.

Meh. Maurice says he is reliably on the right side of the puck, doesn’t cheat the game. He seems to be good at identifying opportunities and jumping in where it makes sense.

Call it whatever level of hockey IQ you like.

Whatever his hockey IQ, it seems to be working well with his skill, physicality, and compete level at playoff time against the Oilers, which is nice
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2025, 11:33 AM   #4843
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
Meh. Maurice says he is reliably on the right side of the puck, doesn’t cheat the game. He seems to be good at identifying opportunities and jumping in where it makes sense.

Call it whatever level of hockey IQ you like.

Whatever his hockey IQ, it seems to be working well with his skill, physicality, and compete level at playoff time against the Oilers, which is nice
He's one of the best at jumping in. He's not going to be the guy setting up a line of non-high end players though.

I agree the term "IQ" is not easily defined.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2025, 11:43 AM   #4844
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
Some people are still hung up on blaming Bennett and I don’t get it

Fact is he was never given consistent linemates and rarely played at his natural position

The GM is the guy who ruined the Flames and is now thankfully ruining the Leafs
The coaches were all duds selected by him

He went somewhere where he was played at his position with consistent linemates and fluorished

The underachievers running the Flames recognized his low hockey IQ, according to the guy a few posts up, but he is leading the entire playoffs in goals this year

Why are people putting effort in to talking the guy down? Defending the Flames regime that squandered Tkachuk, let Johnny walk, traded a first to get rid of Monahan, and simply couldn’t figure out the 2 piece puzzle that would get value out of Bennett

It is just weird at this point
I'm saying it's not all one sided. Do you think Bennett did his best to achieve here?
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2025, 11:55 AM   #4845
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
I'm saying it's not all one sided. Do you think Bennett did his best to achieve here?

Pretty much, given what he had to work with, and where he was at in his development arc. I never questioned the effort, but you could see the frustration

I remember Hartley loved him and said he was like a caged cat, you couldn’t hold him back. This is something you want in not only hockey but other professions. I’d rather have to reel someone in than push them out

Then Tre put his stamp on the team and some really bad coaches couldn’t figure out what to do
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DeluxeMoustache For This Useful Post:
Old 06-12-2025, 11:59 AM   #4846
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
Pretty much, given what he had to work with, and where he was at in his development arc. I never questioned the effort, but you could see the frustration

I remember Hartley loved him and said he was like a caged cat, you couldn’t hold him back. This is something you want in not only hockey but other professions. I’d rather have to reel someone in than push them out

Then Tre put his stamp on the team and some really bad coaches couldn’t figure out what to do
Hartley said that before he'd played one regular season game.

I think it's crazy to place all the blame on one side for a player not busting into the roster. The same staff saw a guy a year older in Monahan and he forced his way into the top line. Andersson forced his way up the lineup. Tkachuk as well.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2025, 12:03 PM   #4847
Buff
Franchise Player
 
Buff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
He healthy scratched him and played him mainly on Derek Ryan's wing. Which Sutter probably thought was great because he loved Derek Ryan.
When did Sutter scratch Bennett?

Sutter was hired on March 4 and Bennett was scratched March 4 and March 6 but due to Covid protocols Sutter didn't take the bench until March 7 or 11. Anyway, after those two games Bennett played every game until he was traded.
Buff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2025, 12:04 PM   #4848
Buff
Franchise Player
 
Buff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Sutter only healthy scratched him because he played the exact same lineup from the game before when he wasn’t the coach.
I guess I should have kept reading before responding to Gio
Buff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2025, 12:05 PM   #4849
Buff
Franchise Player
 
Buff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
Some people are still hung up on blaming Bennett and I don’t get it

Fact is he was never given consistent linemates and rarely played at his natural position

The GM is the guy who ruined the Flames and is now thankfully ruining the Leafs
The coaches were all duds selected by him
There was speculation that Bennett could wind up in Toronto but I've wondered about that. Would he go back to Treliving?
Buff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2025, 12:07 PM   #4850
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buff View Post
There was speculation that Bennett could wind up in Toronto but I've wondered about that. Would he go back to Treliving?
Apparently he's said he wouldn't go to Toronto. I don't blame him, even aside from Treliving. Though he's exactly what they need. He'd be a third string centre behind Matthews and Tavares untless Tavares takes a back seat (unlikely). And I think while he's obviously a good crunch player, he also enjoys not being under a microscope.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 06-12-2025, 12:10 PM   #4851
dustygoon
Franchise Player
 
dustygoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80 View Post
Sutter says he was disappointed when Sam was traded.


__________________
.
"Fun must be always!" - Tomas Hertl
dustygoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2025, 12:33 PM   #4852
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Pretty good article at the Athletic today regarding Bennett's worth in free agency. The prevailing thought is that he's going to get overpaid but the contract may not age as bad as many of us think it could.

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/640...ency-contract/

Quote:
Playoff Bennett is a different player. Playoff Bennett is a dawg.

Among players who have actually accrued a decent enough sample (41 games) over the last five playoffs, only six have elevated their offensive game by six or more goals per 82: Jonathan Marchessault, Zach Hyman, Ondrej Palat, Sam Bennett, Artturi Lehkonen and Leon Draisaitl. Two of those — Marchessault and Palat — have been one-playoff wonders. The other four do it (almost) every year, having four of five seasons where their Offensive Rating jumps by four or more goals per 82. Consider that the gold standard of dawg (with Connor McDavid too, of course), an exclusive group that Bennett is a part of.
Quote:
Based on Corey Sznajder’s tracking work, he certainly has the puck skills to do so. Bennett is no passenger on Tkachuk’s line — he’s very involved in all three zones, chipping in on breakouts and creating a lot of chances in zone. He’s also elite at moving the puck through the neutral zone with control, a skill he probably doesn’t get enough credit for.
Quote:
For Bennett to be worth the big bucks, he does need to offer a bit more in the regular season — and luckily he does appear to have the tools to do so. No one knows exactly how he’ll age, and I’m not saying the Kadri or Hyman path is a guarantee. That’s still the best-case scenario and not the most likely one. But there are some reasons to be optimistic that a Bennett deal won’t be as bad as the sticker shock that comes with paying a 55-point center $8 million.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 06-12-2025, 01:13 PM   #4853
Blaster86
UnModerator
 
Blaster86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia.
Exp:
Default

Sam Bennett's sister lives in Vancouver apparently. Time for me to get my hopes up over a small insignificant fact!
__________________

THANK MR DEMKO
CPHL Ottawa Vancouver
Blaster86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2025, 01:24 PM   #4854
DazzlinDino
Franchise Player
 
DazzlinDino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Grew up in Calgary now living in USA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
I'm sure he wanted to play for Sutter. But frankly having a trade request and then yanking it doesn't sit well with me anyway. Especially when the new coach is doing exactly what the old coach did.

Calgary made big mistakes developing Bennett. But no one seems to put any onus on Bennett to (a) play better within the role and (b) make the most of what time he had when given what he wanted. I think that Florida gave him a better chance to succeed for sure. But that's pretty typical - Calgary did the same with Lindholm. I also think that Bennett probably figured that he had to up his game after the trade, which he finally did.
Lots of people have put the onus on Sam Bennett, but just take a look at how he has been handled in Florida compared to Calgary. In Calgary he would have been put right back down on the fourth line but in Florida he has been on the second line since he got there. We can keep trying to blame the player over and over but at the end of the day Calgary didn't know what they had in Sam Bennett and they didn't know how to harnesses his potential. Even Conroy after Bennett was traded said that he should have been given more of an opportunity . If Craig Conroy saw something, why don't we believe him?

Even Sutter said he was disappointed to see Bennett traded, Bennett himself said that he liked playing for Sutter. Sam is proving everyone wrong since he got to Florida and we are still blaming the player. What many don't realize is that Florida has been doing this with several other players too, they are able to identify players that are being handled poorly in other organizations and bring them into their own. Sam Reinhart is another one.., a player that we probably could have gotten at that time too.

I get trying to share the responsibility between the Calgary Flames and Sam, but improvement for the Calgary Flames doesn't come from blaming Sam Bennett. It comes from self-evaluation within the organization. Cuz we need to look at Florida and see how they're treating the players and building them up. Calgary doesn't need to blame the player they need to recognize they made some blunders. That is a big issue when you consider how difficult it is to get top elite players in this league.


I agree with EE, I think it's unfair to blame the player when the organization has to do better job to keep their star players. In Florida he's the assistant captain in Calgary he is likely still hovering the fourth line under Tre. Craig Conroy on the other hand seems to have gotten the coaches vets and the young players playing together and supporting each other.

That is a huge step!

Last edited by DazzlinDino; 06-12-2025 at 01:45 PM.
DazzlinDino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2025, 01:26 PM   #4855
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Pretty good article at the Athletic today regarding Bennett's worth in free agency. The prevailing thought is that he's going to get overpaid but the contract may not age as bad as many of us think it could.

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/640...ency-contract/
Yeah, I think $8M will be today's $6M awfully quickly.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2025, 01:33 PM   #4856
Shazam
Franchise Player
 
Shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
Exp:
Default

Fla should keep Bennett and trade Tkachuk.
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
Shazam is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Shazam For This Useful Post:
Old 06-12-2025, 01:34 PM   #4857
Firebot
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

A friendly reminder that Sam Bennett once briefly played with Monahan and Gaudreau in what could have been scenario, only to be bumped off for Chris Stewart.

Bennett if he ends up winning the Conn Smythe should invite Gulutzan to help raise it for him.
Firebot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2025, 01:40 PM   #4858
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Hartley said that before he'd played one regular season game.

I think it's crazy to place all the blame on one side for a player not busting into the roster. The same staff saw a guy a year older in Monahan and he forced his way into the top line. Andersson forced his way up the lineup. Tkachuk as well.
I correspondingly kind of think that your revisionist history to suit your narrative is tending towards crazy

Monahan was older, slotted with Gaudreau and they had chemistry

Tkachuk? They instantly gave him Bennett’s spot with Backlund and Frolik, and the 3 M line was born, and then put Bennett bottom 6. He didn’t force a thing. And Tkachuk performed comparably his first year

Bennett was slotted bottom 6 and produced like a bottom 6

Sorry I can’t argue with your position if you are making up things to support it
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DeluxeMoustache For This Useful Post:
Old 06-12-2025, 02:07 PM   #4859
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
I correspondingly kind of think that your revisionist history to suit your narrative is tending towards crazy

Monahan was older, slotted with Gaudreau and they had chemistry

Tkachuk? They instantly gave him Bennett’s spot with Backlund and Frolik, and the 3 M line was born, and then put Bennett bottom 6. He didn’t force a thing. And Tkachuk performed comparably his first year

Bennett was slotted bottom 6 and produced like a bottom 6

Sorry I can’t argue with your position if you are making up things to support it
Monahan is one year older than Bennett, as I said.

Bennett was given time on pretty much every line. And he underwhelmed - go back and look at the comments at the time. He was terrible defensively his first three years, and under Peters he was one of only two regulars with a minus. Everyone else was double digits in the pluses.

And by comparable you mean Tkachuk got 48 points in 76 games (and +14) to Bennett's 36 in 77 (and -11), OK I guess. You say he produced like a bottom six when in that role. Well, he was moved up from time to time, but he managed to prodice less than other bottom sixers like Lucic, Dube, and Ryan. Somehow he got passed by Andrew Mangiapane.

And speaking of making things up, the year he got traded, Bennett's most minutes were with Monahan and Gaudreau. Almost twice as much as with Lucic and Dube or Backlund and Leivo. https://frozenpool.dobbersports.com/players/sam-bennett

I don't know how many times I can say that, yes, the Flames didn't do a good job with his development. But it doesn't take much to see that some of this was on Bennett. And his game improved when he hit Fla, not just because of opportunity, but also because he simply played better.

Last edited by GioforPM; 06-12-2025 at 02:11 PM.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 06-12-2025, 02:27 PM   #4860
DazzlinDino
Franchise Player
 
DazzlinDino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Grew up in Calgary now living in USA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Monahan is one year older than Bennett, as I said.

Bennett was given time on pretty much every line. And he underwhelmed - go back and look at the comments at the time. He was terrible defensively his first three years, and under Peters he was one of only two regulars with a minus. Everyone else was double digits in the pluses.

And by comparable you mean Tkachuk got 48 points in 76 games (and +14) to Bennett's 36 in 77 (and -11), OK I guess. You say he produced like a bottom six when in that role. Well, he was moved up from time to time, but he managed to prodice less than other bottom sixers like Lucic, Dube, and Ryan. Somehow he got passed by Andrew Mangiapane.

And speaking of making things up, the year he got traded, Bennett's most minutes were with Monahan and Gaudreau. Almost twice as much as with Lucic and Dube or Backlund and Leivo. https://frozenpool.dobbersports.com/players/sam-bennett

I don't know how many times I can say that, yes, the Flames didn't do a good job with his development. But it doesn't take much to see that some of this was on Bennett. And his game improved when he hit Fla, not just because of opportunity, but also because he simply played better.

Definitely Sam Bennett played better when he got to Florida, so has Sam Reinhardt. Florida is doing something that making these players believe in their abilities. I believe Calgary is on the right track under Craig Conroy, they've made some changes, they have a leadership group to build up the young guys, and in the interviews they keep talking about how they believe in each other. I believe they're taking on a bit of the Florida model. Ryan Lomberg, played under the Florida model I am sure they have talked about it.

Blaming the player doesn't do anything for the Calgary Flames, they're the ones that need to improve.

Last edited by DazzlinDino; 06-12-2025 at 02:30 PM.
DazzlinDino is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:21 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy