Canadian Federal Politics Thread v5

[Locke]

Originally Posted by puffnstuff

Can we get a seperate Canada Post thread?

It'll cost ya and it will not deliver on weekends.

[iggy_oi]

Originally Posted by Locke

It'll cost ya and it will not deliver on weekends.

Nor on OT.

[TorqueDog]

Originally Posted by iggy_oi

Unless you’re lying about your calls and the calls of others to Canada Post complaining about it and a lack of any action on their part to address it then it’s completely reasonable to state that the company consents to what they’re doing.

Or the feedback loop is broken, which is also entirely plausible (ie: feedback that makes it to CSRs isn’t getting to the right people to take appropriate action). Or the employee gets a finger wagging, they shrug and say they won’t do it again, then do it again and the customer gets fed up and just resigns themselves to the fact that their route’s carrier is sh-t. [shrug] All sorts of possibilities but at the end of the day, the lazy idiot who doesn’t follow the customer’s instructions is the one who had the last chance to do right by the customer and didn’t. So f-ck that guy in particular.

I’m going to stop this here. Nothing you’ve said is substantially different than what you’ve already said. You continue to make logical leaps and unfounded assumptions to defend the indefensible while projecting that onto me and onto GGG too. It’s obvious we’re in “waste of keystrokes” territory now, I can’t be arsed any longer.

[iggy_oi]

Originally Posted by TorqueDog

Or the feedback loop is broken, which is also entirely plausible (ie: feedback that makes it to CSRs isn’t getting to the right people to take appropriate action). Or the employee gets a finger wagging, they shrug and say they won’t do it again, then do it again and the customer gets fed up and just resigns themselves to the fact that their route’s carrier is sh-t. [shrug] All sorts of possibilities but at the end of the day, the lazy idiot who doesn’t follow the customer’s instructions is the one who had the last chance to do right by the customer and didn’t. So f-ck that guy in particular.

Can you remind me who was the poster winning about assumptions earlier?

I’m going to stop this here.

I doubt it…

Nothing you’ve said is substantially different than what you’ve already said. You continue to make logical leaps and unfounded assumptions to defend the indefensible while projecting that onto me and onto GGG too. It’s obvious we’re in “waste of keystrokes” territory now, I can’t be arsed any longer.

Yay I was right. At least you managed to double down on your assumptions argument one more time though.

[rubecube]

Not that I give much credence to AI but hilarious that both ChatGPT and Grok named PP the biggest spreader of misinformation in Canada.

I think among the major party leaders that's certainly true, and it's not even close.

[Locke]

Originally Posted by rubecube

Not that I give much credence to AI but hilarious that both ChatGPT and Grok named PP the biggest spreader of misinformation in Canada.

I think among the major party leaders that's certainly true, and it's not even close.

So what? He's not in charge. Ergo his misinformation meant nothing.

[iggy_oi]

Originally Posted by Locke

So what? He's not in charge. Ergo his misinformation meant nothing.

He’s in charge of his party though.

[Locke]

Originally Posted by iggy_oi

He’s in charge of his party though.

Is his party in charge?

[BigThief]

Originally Posted by Locke

So what? He's not in charge. Ergo his misinformation meant nothing.

Originally Posted by Locke

Is his party in charge?

Pierre Pollivere still has strong political sway and voice in this country. Not sure what you're even saying here.

[Locke]

Originally Posted by BigThief

Pierre Pollivere still has strong political sway and voice in this country. Not sure what you're even saying here.

He cant make laws.

That you cant understand that is no surprise.

[BigThief]

Right... that doesn't change what I said, child.

[iggy_oi]

Originally Posted by Locke

Is his party in charge?

Is his party likely to run again in the next election?

[Locke]

Originally Posted by BigThief

Right... that doesn't change what I said, child.

Oooh....personal attacks. Thats very mature. I think theres something in the rules about that.

But then again, how many more do you have?

[Locke]

Originally Posted by iggy_oi

Is his party likely to run again in the next election?

Sure. With what leader? What platform? You think its going to be ceteris paribus?

Sorry...do you think everything is going to stay exactly the same?

[BigThief]

Originally Posted by Locke

Oooh....personal attacks. Thats very mature. I think theres something in the rules about that.

Girly, I was replying to this.

That you cant understand that is no surprise.

Understanding you post 100 times a day, certainly you didn't forget the one you posted five minute prior? Don't feign innocent, it's embarrassing.

[BigThief]

Originally Posted by Locke

Sure. With what leader?

PP is leader of the official opposition and he'll be back as a member of parliament shortly. Pretending his voice doesn't carry weight in this country is just ignorant or stupid. He might be one of the more well known politicians currently in Canada. Will he be the leader next election? What will the conservative platform be? No one knows the answer to those questions but we do know right now he's an influential voice in this country and is a super spreader of misinformation. Brushing it off as nothing is nice, but it's an ignorant move.

[iggy_oi]

Originally Posted by Locke

Sure. With what leader? What platform? You think its going to be ceteris paribus?

Sorry...do you think everything is going to stay exactly the same?

I’m just questioning the motives of the individual party candidates who have kept him on as leader and are not vocally opposing his rhetoric. Most of them will be running in the next election after all. Hoping they(and he) can change, but at this point there doesn’t seem to be very much appetite on their part to do so.

[Locke]

Originally Posted by iggy_oi

I’m just questioning the motives of the individual party candidates who have kept him on as leader and are not vocally opposing his rhetoric. Most of them will be running in the next election after all. Hoping they(and he) can change, but at this point there doesn’t seem to be very much appetite on their part to do so.

And I hope they dont. Poilievre strikes me as a fairly serious crazy person.

I hope they replace him but the rot in that party goes deeper than that.

[iggy_oi]

Originally Posted by Locke

And I hope they dont. Poilievre strikes me as a fairly serious crazy person.

Um…why wouldn’t you want them to change then?

I hope they replace him but the rot in that party goes deeper than that.

Um…why wouldn’t you want them to change then?

[Locke]

Originally Posted by iggy_oi

Um…why wouldn’t you want them to change then?

Um…why wouldn’t you want them to change then?

What are you even talking about? I actively asked for change.