Well one is that this guy will definitely be voting for them.
"Here's a typical conservative who trashes socialism complaining when he doesn't get enough of it."
@JamieScaddan
Here's a typical Canadian Conservative boomer that is living in his travel trailer because the CPP and OAS he receives after 55 years of working won't pay for his mortgage and all the taxes and utilities anymore.
All governments have plundered the social safety net that CPP was designed for but none so much as the liberals.
I'll be voting in an advance poll ASAP and it won't be for Marxist Carney Canada's WEF governor.
Fifty five years of work and still has a mortgage, and had the advantage of cheap housing? And the government is the problem here? I'm not sure CPP was designed to be paying down mortgages, but I'm no fancy Xitter poster. Dude sounds like he left his bootstraps dragging for decades.
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
The only "typical dumb take" is shockingly from Azure once more. Who the hell takes what Thomas Mulcair says as though it's the "right" answer? He was a flat-out liability as a leader when at the helm of the Federal NDP post-Layton and is the reason why they're now a rudderless party within spitting distance of losing official party status under Singh.
Might as well take investment advice from Bernie Madoff.
__________________
-James
GO FLAMES GO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Typical dumb take.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TorqueDog For This Useful Post:
He has experience in the role of 'opposition' as a member of government. Therefore he has more insight than you ever will. So makes more sense to consider what he has to say rather than your typical ignorant Liberal talking point dribble.
How is every one of your political takes consistently and legitimately this bad. If I had more confidence in you as a person I would honestly believe you were doing it on purpose to act like a caricature or some sort of false flag operation against conservatives.
The Following User Says Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
He has experience in the role of 'opposition' as a member of government. Therefore he has more insight than you ever will. So makes more sense to consider what he has to say rather than your typical ignorant Liberal talking point dribble.
Good morning PP bootlicker! Did you sleep well knowing the Libs went from 26% to 56% in Manitoba? Party on portage!! lol
__________________ Peter12 "I'm no Trump fan but he is smarter than most if not everyone in this thread. ”
Did Mulcair explain why? I don't click tweets if I can help it.
__________________ "The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CorsiHockeyLeague For This Useful Post:
MathGod: *Asks a very direct question: Can you point to specific situations where the right-wing position (rather than the left or center) was the correct one, pertaining to the 3 topics you listed?*
Axe the tax seems to have been the correct move which the conservatives having been calling for over many years. They opposed the annual increases and they wanted the carbon tax gone. The Liberals have finally taken that advice and adolished the carbon tax and even environmental activists like Guilbeault are on board with that decision. Also, BC NDP followed up with their own plan to axe the tax.
He has experience in the role of 'opposition' as a member of government. Therefore he has more insight than you ever will. So makes more sense to consider what he has to say rather than your typical ignorant Liberal talking point dribble.
What the others have said, plus... it's DRIVEL NOT DRIBBLE
I think people have forgotten that the the typical Liberal government before Trudeau was fiscal right and social left. Carney isn’t a wholesale change to the Liberal foundation it’s more a reversion to its past.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bonded For This Useful Post:
Have any of the federal parties said anything about the Pathways CCUS? Last I can find Pathways was trying to make a deal with the federal government to fix carbon pricing but that was a year ago.
It's weird with everything going on we're not hearing anything about a potential $16bn project in Alberta
To be crystal clear I 100% agree with you- but this is absolutely not the grace you would provide to a right leaning politician if the same thing happened and they did it.
When has a far-right politician ever apologized for a mistake?
The Following User Says Thank You to calculoso For This Useful Post:
When has a far-right politician ever apologized for a mistake?
They never do, hardline right wingers always double down. They'd rather start nuclear wars and destroy our entire universe than have the integrity to admit when they're wrong.
I think that the issue that the CPC just can't seem to come to grips with is why support is moving away from them to the Liberals. They seem to think it's all about policy and the cost of living when it's still about the existential threat from the US and who can deal with that. Sure, people want to pay less tax, and the cost of living is something, but the reality is that this has taken a backseat to the US aggression.
The Following User Says Thank You to Slava For This Useful Post:
The only "typical dumb take" is shockingly from Azure once more. Who the hell takes what Thomas Mulcair says as though it's the "right" answer? He was a flat-out liability as a leader when at the helm of the Federal NDP post-Layton and is the reason why they're now a rudderless party within spitting distance of losing official party status under Singh.
Might as well take investment advice from Bernie Madoff.
Much like the right wing loons, Thomas Mulcair was never the same after Trudeau beat him.
Have any of the federal parties said anything about the Pathways CCUS? Last I can find Pathways was trying to make a deal with the federal government to fix carbon pricing but that was a year ago.
It's weird with everything going on we're not hearing anything about a potential $16bn project in Alberta
The drivers behind pathways are shifting to a "take down the industrial carbon tax too!" platform. Led by our illustrious club owner N. Murray Go####yerself, they signed a letter. IMO it basically confirms the undermessaging that has been dogging Pathways for years; it was always a white elephant project that the sand miners were using to soak up government funds and make vague future promises while not actually advancing it in meaningful ways, or having meaningful negotiations about it.
I hope they are forced into it personally. If not, perhaps we can start a specific tax for that region and then build and operate it for them.
Alberta's already got one of (if not the) largest operational carbon sequestration pipelines in the world with the ACTL, and it is only like 20% filled. It's an incredible resource and enables investments like Dow's Path2Zero project ($11 billion in AB under construction right now) but ultimately we don't need too many more of these to be built asap while we have existing capacity. This one can't service the oil sands reasonably, so Pathways would be something separate, but Alberta is still making good strides in CCUS. Just not from those liars.
