Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-23-2025, 06:28 PM   #9541
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by traptor View Post
I'd take brady any day over matthew
You might be the only one.
The Cobra is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to The Cobra For This Useful Post:
Old 02-23-2025, 09:58 PM   #9542
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Would be pretty crazy to see Rantanen traded again before the deadline. Especially since Carolina would need to get a legit top line forward back.

What are some teams that are also playoff contenders that would be looking for that kind of trade? I’m really struggling to find a good fit. If Carolina is ok with getting futures, there are plenty of options for trade partners but I wouldn’t think that would be the case. They can’t go Necas to Rantanen to picks/prospects in a year where they have cup aspirations.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2025, 11:17 AM   #9543
OutOfTheCube
Franchise Player
 
OutOfTheCube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

I wonder if Calgary might be interested in Zucker from Buffalo -- pure rental but he's put together a pretty solid season on a one year deal. Maybe as part of a package containing other elements but could be a good addition for a playoff push.
OutOfTheCube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2025, 11:20 AM   #9544
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

I don't think so. They want a C. Plenty of options at LW for the Flames. Also Conroy has said he isn't interested in rentals.
Toonage is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2025, 11:22 AM   #9545
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Seravalli on flames nation today quoting a GM source. I’m paraphrasing Seravalli here but his GM source said that no GMs in the league feel good about trading for Pettersson. Not sure if that qualifies as news… you could maybe interpret that as no GM is willing to pay anything of good value for Pettersson right now. Pinder took that to mean a Pettersson trade would maybe have to be a problem-for-problem trade similar to the PLB for Kuemper trade from last year.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to stemit14 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-24-2025, 11:27 AM   #9546
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

Petterson for Huberdeau..

Or if its a problem for problem... Pettersen for Nurse +?

McDavid with Petterson could be lethal.
keenan87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2025, 11:33 AM   #9547
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OutOfTheCube View Post
I wonder if Calgary might be interested in Zucker from Buffalo -- pure rental but he's put together a pretty solid season on a one year deal. Maybe as part of a package containing other elements but could be a good addition for a playoff push.
I know he doesn't have trade protection, but I recall in the past when he was on the block, there was talk that he didn't want to play in Canada. I wouldn't risk bringing a malcontent into the locker room, especially for a winger.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2025, 11:35 AM   #9548
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14 View Post
Would be pretty crazy to see Rantanen traded again before the deadline. Especially since Carolina would need to get a legit top line forward back.

What are some teams that are also playoff contenders that would be looking for that kind of trade? I’m really struggling to find a good fit. If Carolina is ok with getting futures, there are plenty of options for trade partners but I wouldn’t think that would be the case. They can’t go Necas to Rantanen to picks/prospects in a year where they have cup aspirations.
As a rental? Every contender! He has a small expiring contract and CAR can retain to make things work. He'd get a massive haul of picks and prospects.

When is that last time a player that good hit the market on a small expiring contract like Rantanen?

Frank mentioned Vegas on his show this morning. Can you imagine?
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2025, 11:37 AM   #9549
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose View Post
As a rental? Every contender! He has a small expiring contract and CAR can retain to make things work. He'd get a massive haul of picks and prospects.

When is that last time a player that good hit the market on a small expiring contract like Rantanen?

Frank mentioned Vegas on his show this morning. Can you imagine?
Vegas doesnt have a massive haul of picks and prospects
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2025, 11:42 AM   #9550
Macho0978
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

I could see LA getting Rantanen. They have a lot to offer and should be looking to take that next step
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Macho0978 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-24-2025, 11:45 AM   #9551
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose View Post
As a rental? Every contender! He has a small expiring contract and CAR can retain to make things work. He'd get a massive haul of picks and prospects.

When is that last time a player that good hit the market on a small expiring contract like Rantanen?

Frank mentioned Vegas on his show this morning. Can you imagine?
Yeah but I don’t think Carolina will want picks/prospects. They will want a top line forward. Not just a 2nd line forward - a top line forward. That’s what they had to give up (Necas) for Rantanen so I think they need something like that back. Otherwise, they have essentially made their team worse this year when they should be competing for a cup.

Someone suggested Vegas as an option. Not sure who they could trade that would be enough… Maybe Barbashev + Howden + pick? Don’t know if those players would be enough because those are 2nd/3rd line players.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2025, 11:49 AM   #9552
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978 View Post
I could see LA getting Rantanen. They have a lot to offer and should be looking to take that next step
The hockey gods like to pit LAK against EDM, they have to beat them. This would certainly help.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2025, 11:49 AM   #9553
Paulie Walnuts
Franchise Player
 
Paulie Walnuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

What if Colorado trades back for him. They have the picks and prospects.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2025, 11:52 AM   #9554
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Vegas doesnt have a massive haul of picks and prospects
I am sure they have some random prospect or player that no one knows about but is coveted by the Canes GM.
keenan87 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to keenan87 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-24-2025, 11:53 AM   #9555
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Would the Canes go back to trying to land Pettersson if they flip Rantanen?
Vinny01 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2025, 11:54 AM   #9556
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

Byfield for a signed Rantanen. Who says no?
keenan87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2025, 11:54 AM   #9557
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Vegas doesnt have a massive haul of picks and prospects
It's Vegas, I could see them getting the necessary assets and making that trade in the next 10 days or whatever using leverage/extortion or whatever spellbook McCrimmon uses against his colleagues. Knights always seem to be in on the top talent hitting the trade market and then find a way to make it happen.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2025, 11:55 AM   #9558
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OutOfTheCube View Post
I wonder if Calgary might be interested in Zucker from Buffalo -- pure rental but he's put together a pretty solid season on a one year deal. Maybe as part of a package containing other elements but could be a good addition for a playoff push.
Would need to be bargain bin pricing. No chance the flames are paying any value for a pure rental in his 30’s especially on the wing.
Vinny01 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2025, 11:55 AM   #9559
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan87 View Post
Byfield for a signed Rantanen. Who says no?
He could be CAR's Tkachuck. That would really make things interesting out East.

(not output, moreso the missing ingredient for their team)
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2025, 11:58 AM   #9560
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan87 View Post
Byfield for a signed Rantanen. Who says no?
That’s a really tough call for LA. Don’t think Carolina says no to that - especially if Rantanen does not want to sign with Carolina. It’s LA that it would be tougher to decide. Rantanen is what you hope Byfield develops into. Byfield is still young despite being in the league for a few years now. I think LA would have to consider it.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:10 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy