Canadian Federal Politics Thread v5

[Fuzz]

Originally Posted by Gordon Bombay

"Here in Canada we understand the laws of economics."

"We are in an economic crisis, not of our own making. We are under attack by the United States."

Just a couple gem quotes I just watched Carbon Tax Carney make in interview. This guy might be dumber and worse than Trudeau. Our country is a freaking circus.

Alright buddy, time to open up your left hand and put down the bottle of Gordon's, and open up your right hand and put down the bottle of Bombay, and then go take a nice nap.

[Locke]

Originally Posted by Fuzz

Alright buddy, time to open up your left hand and put down the bottle of Gordon's, and open up your right hand and put down the bottle of Bombay, and then go take a nice nap.

Thats only two tho. Whats the 3rd deke?

Gordon's....Bombay.....and then what?

[Azure]

Originally Posted by Fuzz

And that there is the problem. You have all convinced yourselves that the worst people you support are representations of all people. Both sides. Everyone is awful. No good choices. Can't trust anything. But then someone comes along who is, lets face it, a new politician(not even elected yet, does that even count?) and all you can do is tar them with the same brush.


How many times have people called for a decent normal person with expertise and real world experience to enter politics? It's exactly what people demand, and then instead of any benefit of the doubt, this is the response. Maybe we deserve the lying trash we have...


Elect The Chud.

I swear I would vote for the Liberals & Carney if he came out and said he would repeal bill C-69, support pipeline expansion & lower immigration. I wouldn't even care about the carbon tax at that point.

But he won't, cause he lives in the land of fairy tales and pipe dreams where people feed their kids with, I guess nothing.

[Johnny Makarov]

Originally Posted by Gordon Bombay

Lol really? I assume you've added to the million plus whining posts about PP and Trump. Just a guess.

Sure. at least i'm whining about deplorable pieces of kyit.

[Azure]

Originally Posted by Gordon Bombay

"Here in Canada we understand the laws of economics."

"We are in an economic crisis, not of our own making. We are under attack by the United States."

Just a couple gem quotes I just watched Carbon Tax Carney make in interview. This guy might be dumber and worse than Trudeau. Our country is a freaking circus.

"Why are you so concerned about steel Bob, where have you used steel lately?"

I mean seriously....

[Fuzz]

Originally Posted by Locke

Thats only two tho. Whats the 3rd deke?

Gordon's....Bombay.....and then what?

I dunno, he didn't use a middle name on signup.

[Monahammer]

Originally Posted by Azure

I swear I would vote for the Liberals & Carney if he came out and said he would repeal bill C-69, support pipeline expansion & lower immigration. I wouldn't even care about the carbon tax at that point.

But he won't, cause he lives in the land of fairy tales and pipe dreams where people feed their kids with, I guess nothing.

Azure, you have asked for two things out of three that are totally incompatible with each other. I think there's a complete and utter misunderstanding of the demographic situation Canada is in that has infected our political sphere. Is immigration like 2023-24 sustainable? No. Can we just blanket lower immigration and expect to build, well, basically anything? Also no.

Canada is one of the highest capital cost jurisdictions in the world to construct things. Some of this is regulatory, but the major factor is compensation and employment. Canadians are expensive labourers. They expect to be paid. We also have an massive shortage of basically any type of skilled labor (BuildForce Canada has some really good stuff on this, not sure if it's publicly accessible but here: https://www.buildforce.ca/en/resourc...port#directory)
Basically, we don't have enough people to build the projects already underway in canada. In some cases, these deficits work out to 10s of thousands of skilled laborers missing in our market by 2050.

That's not considering new resource development or market access projects (pipelines and mines baby). That's just existing projects and the required housing.

So, you're essentially asking with your three policy positions to stem in the only reasonable flow of lower cost labor while also initiating billions more in capital projects, simultaneously?

It doesn't work.

[Gordon Bombay]

Originally Posted by Fuzz

I dunno, he didn't use a middle name on signup.

I'll finish the deke off with a shot of Grey Goose before my nap.

[Monahammer]

Originally Posted by Johnny Makarov

Sure. at least i'm whining about deplorable pieces of kyit.

Hey Johnny, what's your real name? I would like to start using your name in place of the word "##########" on the forums, so that you can come on and read that I think you're a ########## every day.

If that seems unreasonable to you, you should immediately stop doing it about someone you've never met.

[Locke]

Originally Posted by Gordon Bombay

I'll finish the deke off with a shot of Grey Goose before my nap.

Alright! There you go! The Grey Goose pre-nap slap!

Thats how it's done!

What were we talking about again?

[Azure]

Originally Posted by Monahammer

Azure, you have asked for two things out of three that are totally incompatible with each other. I think there's a complete and utter misunderstanding of the demographic situation Canada is in that has infected our political sphere. Is immigration like 2023-24 sustainable? No. Can we just blanket lower immigration and expect to build, well, basically anything? Also no.

Canada is one of the highest capital cost jurisdictions in the world to construct things. Some of this is regulatory, but the major factor is compensation and employment. Canadians are expensive labourers. They expect to be paid. We also have an massive shortage of basically any type of skilled labor (BuildForce Canada has some really good stuff on this, not sure if it's publicly accessible but here: https://www.buildforce.ca/en/resourc...port#directory)
Basically, we don't have enough people to build the projects already underway in canada. In some cases, these deficits work out to 10s of thousands of skilled laborers missing in our market by 2050.

That's not considering new resource development or market access projects (pipelines and mines baby). That's just existing projects and the required housing.

So, you're essentially asking with your three policy positions to stem in the only reasonable flow of lower cost labor while also initiating billions more in capital projects, simultaneously?

It doesn't work.

I would not compare immigration the past say 5 years, with immigration the past 50 years.

[Johnny Makarov]

Originally Posted by Monahammer

Hey Johnny, what's your real name? I would like to start using your name in place of the word "##########" on the forums, so that you can come on and read that I think you're a ########## every day.

If that seems unreasonable to you, you should immediately stop doing it about someone you've never met.

you don't think a leader of a federal political party who supported the Freedumb convoy is a deplorable piece of kyit? Or that an Orange Rapist who is going to influence our GDP and might put us in a recession is a piece of kyit? ok onlyturekfan....

You posted this.... oh the fake outrage! lol

Jagmeet is the most useless #### of all time. Seriously, it would be hilarious if he wasn't a major political figure in our country. He has set the NDP back at least a decade if not more.

[FlamesAddiction]

Originally Posted by Firebot

Wow I didn't know you hated Trudeau that much

BTW we had Erin O'Toole in 2021 available as a choice who was a career lawyer and veteran that meets your criteria.

Carney's credentials aren't questioned, it's the outsider part that is. Not like it matters much at this point as current Canadian priorities have shifted and that isn't playing much of a role (neither is the Just like Trudeau campaign that's failing)

I don't know enough about O'Toole to know if he would have been a good PM or not, or to criticize him either. For whatever reason, he just didn't seem to inspire which is too bad. Being able to win an election is a completely different skillset than being able to lead government. Which sucks to be honest, because I'd rather have a boring candidate that might not be the best speaker, but at least has some brains.

The Liberals did the same thing with Stephane Dion, who IMO is a really intelligent guy and super qualified, but holy man was he boring to listen to. The Liberals were going to lose that election no matter what, but I think he deserved better.

[Gordon Bombay]

Originally Posted by Johnny Makarov

you don't think a leader of a federal political party who supported the Freedumb convoy is a deplorable piece of kyit? Or that an Orange Rapist who is going to influence our GDP and might put us in a recession is a piece of kyit? ok onlyturekfan....

Supporting freedom and peaceful protest makes him a piece of ####? Don't understand that one.

[Torture]

Originally Posted by Gordon Bombay

"Here in Canada we understand the laws of economics."

"We are in an economic crisis, not of our own making. We are under attack by the United States."

Just a couple gem quotes I just watched Carbon Tax Carney make in interview. This guy might be dumber and worse than Trudeau. Our country is a freaking circus.

I mean, you could at least try but somehow I think that line isn't going to stick for former Bank of Canada and Bank of England Governor and guy that has a Bachelors, Masters, and Doctorate level degree in economics.

[Johnny Makarov]

Originally Posted by Gordon Bombay

Supporting freedom and peaceful protest makes him a piece of ####? Don't understand that one.

Don't understand? Peaceful hahahahaha. oh god. you got your bank account frozen didn't you.

Ok, whats your address and we will send the freedumbers to your back alley and honk their horns at 4am and send diesel fumes into your basement.

[Monahammer]

Originally Posted by Johnny Makarov

you don't think a leader of a federal political party who supported the Freedumb convoy is a deplorable piece of kyit? Or that an Orange Rapist who is going to influence our GDP and might put us in a recession is a piece of kyit? ok onlyturekfan....

You posted this.... oh the fake outrage! lol

I have made this post to you before. You are using part of a person's NAME to dodge swear filters. Oliver Kylington is a real person with real mental health issues. You using his name as a placeword for "####" makes you look extremely infantile at best. At worst, as I have come to believe, it reveals that you are an utter and total moron. Mind that you immediately took this as some sort of political jab when it's very clearly just me chiding you (AGAIN) about your use of this person's name inappropriately. You are a piece of Kyit.

Originally Posted by Azure

I would not compare immigration the past say 5 years, with immigration the past 50 years.

use some facts and figures. 50 years is a long time and immigration was not consistent during that entire period.

We need higher immigration than historically if we are going to build out to the aspirations of the same people who seemingly hate the idea of immigration.

Yes, I agree that immigration in the last 5 years has probably been a failing policy, but I likely disagree about why. We need more stringency, but we also need to offer more to immigrants. Otherwise we will just get a bunch of "student" immigrants.

[Doctorfever]

Originally Posted by BigThief

You posted a four year old tweet that didn't address anything you replied to. Good job?

Picture is worth a thousand words!!

[Johnny Makarov]

Originally Posted by Monahammer

I have made this post to you before. You are using part of a person's NAME to dodge swear filters. Oliver Kylington is a real person with real mental health issues. You using his name as a placeword for "####" makes you look extremely infantile at best. At worst, as I have come to believe, it reveals that you are an utter and total moron. Mind that you immediately took this as some sort of political jab when it's very clearly just me chiding you (AGAIN) about your use of this person's name inappropriately. You are a piece of Kyit.

ok ####face. put me on ignore! lol are you going to lecture people who type kunt in here? I never considered using ky as an instult to Kylington.

So what did you call Jagmeet? how did he hurt you?

[Gordon Bombay]

Originally Posted by Johnny Makarov

Don't understand? Peaceful hahahahaha. oh god. you got your bank account frozen didn't you.

Ok, whats your address and we will send the freedumbers to your back alley and honk their horns at 4am and send diesel fumes into your basement.

Sorry, I still don't understand. Honking horns isn't nice? People got hurt and lost their lives?