Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-18-2024, 09:55 AM   #4161
woob
#1 Goaltender
 
woob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

It's amazing how much money has been spent on this already and we are still no closer to a Green Line.
woob is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2024, 10:09 AM   #4162
Torture
Loves Teh Chat!
 
Torture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by powderjunkie View Post
It is concerning that there is this much sunk cost apparently only relevant to the tunnel with no real progress. Have we already bought a TBM?
Why is that concerning? The project had been approved and green lit all the way through up until the time when the UCP yanked funding. Even the week before he yanked funding Dreeshan said they could bank on it and the province was 100% committed. They were doing the work that had been agreed upon and they needed to do that work beforehand to relocate utilities downtown and acquire land before 'building track'. Everyone was aware this work was being done to prepare.

I hate to say this, but IMO unless the City can get guarantees from the UCP that they're going to share the risk they have to walk away and hope future Governments can bring it all together again. This plan is 5% designed vs 60%+ for the City's tunneling plan so the ~6-7B elevated cost is probably +/- 50%.

Yes you lose the 1.5B funding from the Feds, but the City is on the hook for any funding above the provincial/federal commitment and you can't commit to a 'plan' scribbled with a crayon and no cost certainties. This boondoggle looks like it's only going to get more expensive and the City could easily be in the hole for as much or greater than that 1.5B commitment. The risk is simply too great and the City doesn't have the financial capacity to carry it alone.

Last edited by Torture; 12-18-2024 at 10:18 AM.
Torture is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Torture For This Useful Post:
Old 12-18-2024, 10:22 AM   #4163
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fisher Account View Post
Honestly, the best thing for The City to do right now may be to just walk away from the project entirely and wait for a new government. This is ridiculous.
This is where I'm at now too. The proper and most strategic long-term option here is tunneling downtown; the cheapest time to do it was yesterday, the second cheapest will be today. The UCP's rushed 'report' is basically just a document intentionally designed to be combative to the City, virtue signal to their own red meat base, and try to align with a new incoming mayor that will just be a conservative muppet IMO. It may cost more to wait longer, but maybe we wait until a provincial government who wants to work with the city is in charge.
Muta is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Muta For This Useful Post:
Old 12-18-2024, 10:25 AM   #4164
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Torture View Post
Yes you lose the 1.5B funding from the Feds, but the City is on the hook for any funding above the provincial/federal commitment and you can't commit to a 'plan' scribbled with a crayon and no cost certainties.
Totally agree with your post. That said, I've always never really taken federal funding timeline requirements like this seriously though. If Calgary needs that funding for a project of this magnitude, for a city of this importance, and it has solid data and local (and hopefully provincial) support, federal funding will be found one way or another.
Muta is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Muta For This Useful Post:
Old 12-18-2024, 10:31 AM   #4165
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob View Post
It's amazing how much money has been spent on this already and we are still no closer to a Green Line.
Just one more feasibility study. We promise!!
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2024, 10:33 AM   #4166
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fisher Account View Post
Honestly, the best thing for The City to do right now may be to just walk away from the project entirely and wait for a new government. This is ridiculous.
No doubt that is what the UCP are hoping for as well.
They'll get to blame who ever is mayor for being too liberal, and trudeau for some reason while claiming culture wars are ruining the province.
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2024, 10:34 AM   #4167
The Fisher Account
Scoring Winger
 
The Fisher Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta View Post
This is where I'm at now too. The proper and most strategic long-term option here is tunneling downtown; the cheapest time to do it was yesterday, the second cheapest will be today. The UCP's rushed 'report' is basically just a document intentionally designed to be combative to the City, virtue signal to their own red meat base, and try to align with a new incoming mayor that will just be a conservative muppet IMO. It may cost more to wait longer, but maybe we wait until a provincial government who wants to work with the city is in charge.
Yep. The City needs to take a hard line and say 'Tunnel or Bust'. I also wouldn't be surprised if the Feds swoop in at some point to save this and offset the Provinces' contribution (wouldn't Marlaina love that).
The Fisher Account is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2024, 10:35 AM   #4168
woob
#1 Goaltender
 
woob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by topfiverecords View Post
Just one more feasibility study. We promise!!
I want to know how I can get in on that sweet sweet feasibility study money!
woob is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2024, 10:37 AM   #4169
puffnstuff
Franchise Player
 
puffnstuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: wearing raccoons for boots
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheIronMaiden View Post
No doubt that is what the UCP are hoping for as well.
They'll get to blame who ever is mayor for being too liberal, and trudeau for some reason while claiming culture wars are ruining the province.
Trains (that dont go to Banff for our donor) are woke!
puffnstuff is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to puffnstuff For This Useful Post:
Old 12-18-2024, 10:40 AM   #4170
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

A bigger problem. Too many full busses leave people behind. Shouldn't all the people that pay for transit be enough money to run more busses?

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calga...hind-1.7408981
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2024, 10:49 AM   #4171
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports View Post
A bigger problem. Too many full busses leave people behind. Shouldn't all the people that pay for transit be enough money to run more busses?

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calga...hind-1.7408981
Not really. Buying a bus and hiring a driver incur costs beyond just operating them specifically in rush hour. Transit doesn't make money here.
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2024, 10:56 AM   #4172
Jimmy Stang
Franchise Player
 
Jimmy Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheIronMaiden View Post
No doubt that is what the UCP are hoping for as well.
They'll get to blame who ever is mayor for being too liberal, and trudeau for some reason while claiming culture wars are ruining the province.
Don't forget Nenshi. Being the biggest threat to Smith and the UCP, this will be "his" boondoggle.

They are no doubt hoping for a Pierre, Danielle, and (insert UCP-aligned mayor) trifecta of "common sense" that will get this done at double the cost for a less functional line. And then back pats and victory laps.
Jimmy Stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2024, 11:07 AM   #4173
Jimmy Stang
Franchise Player
 
Jimmy Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fisher Account View Post
Yep. The City needs to take a hard line and say 'Tunnel or Bust'. I also wouldn't be surprised if the Feds swoop in at some point to save this and offset the Provinces' contribution (wouldn't Marlaina love that).
But remember that the UCP is passing (has passed?) laws that ensure that federal funding has to be approved by the province.
Jimmy Stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2024, 11:17 AM   #4174
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob View Post
I want to know how I can get in on that sweet sweet feasibility study money!
Sell everything you own and donate the returns to a UCP campaign.

It's like those chain letters where if you send a dollar to the next person on the list you'll get ten in return.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2024, 11:18 AM   #4175
The Fisher Account
Scoring Winger
 
The Fisher Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy Stang View Post
But remember that the UCP is passing (has passed?) laws that ensure that federal funding has to be approved by the province.
Doh!
The Fisher Account is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2024, 12:04 PM   #4176
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy Stang View Post
Don't forget Nenshi. Being the biggest threat to Smith and the UCP, this will be "his" boondoggle.
Which will make it hilarious if he beats them and gets to save the project and claim responsibility for both the municipal and provincial funding.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2024, 12:05 PM   #4177
accord1999
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports View Post
A bigger problem. Too many full busses leave people behind. Shouldn't all the people that pay for transit be enough money to run more busses?
Overcrowded/overloaded buses were a major reason for the Green Line to skip directly to LRT; but then the planners decided not to build the section that has the most incidents.


accord1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to accord1999 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-18-2024, 12:31 PM   #4178
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SebC For This Useful Post:
Old 12-18-2024, 12:47 PM   #4179
Torture
Loves Teh Chat!
 
Torture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta View Post
Totally agree with your post. That said, I've always never really taken federal funding timeline requirements like this seriously though. If Calgary needs that funding for a project of this magnitude, for a city of this importance, and it has solid data and local (and hopefully provincial) support, federal funding will be found one way or another.
Totally agree. When the deadline passes and the money is gone, that's just this commitment, doesn't mean any future opportunity of getting a billion bucks from the Feds is gone.
Torture is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2024, 12:50 PM   #4180
Torture
Loves Teh Chat!
 
Torture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by accord1999 View Post
Overcrowded/overloaded buses were a major reason for the Green Line to skip directly to LRT; but then the planners decided not to build the section that has the most incidents.

Look at all those incidents along the centre street north corridor that is now left in limbo for 'many many years' according to Dreeshan himself. Amazing. Couldn't #### it up more if you tried UCP. Thanks a bunch.


Spoiler!
Torture is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
c-train , calgary transit , information , lrt , renderings


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:05 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy