Another lame dodge bro. It ain't an ad hominem if it's true. I mean, believing that Biden would having anything to do with Rcihard [sic] Spencer? Stupid to the nth degree.
Again never said Biden wanted anything to do with Richard Spencer..anyways a intellectual conversation with you is below my pay grade
Enjoy your evening sir
Last edited by MelBridgeman; 11-08-2024 at 07:00 PM.
Oh nelly and your false dichotomy. The obvious answer would be that they don't agree with your false dichotomy, but i wouldn't know i have never talked to one knowingly, have you?
Why would people vote for Trudeau and his "black" face and his accusations of groping woman...probably for the same reason, they just don't care
It's not a false dichotomy. If you're going to try and gotcha me with a logical fallacy, maybe you should actually know how it works? We call that form of distraction away from the perfectly reasonable argument a red herring. Perhaps you should look it up.
The fact is that they either are ambivalent about his openly racist and misogynistic positions and behavior, making them amoral, or they are very comfortable with it and don't see anything particularly troubling with it, making them immoral. Or they're just ####ing racist and misogynistic, you know, a deplorable human being.
There's no way that anyone could not be keenly aware of who and what Trump is at this point, and to suggest otherwise is pure intellectual dishonesty.
And yes, my neighbors down the street are big Trump supporters. They fall into category "A" of being ambivalent to his racism. I've traveled this state and met some pure evil ####heads who are all in on the white supremacy. They would fall into the latter category of deplorable. They are all fully aware of who he is.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Trump wins one demographic...white people with no post secondary education
sometimes we can indeed call a spade a spade. Even if he got 13% of the black vote and not 11% this time
Not all dumb racists but come on now, quite a few
Scott Galloway, who I find quite insightful about a lot of topics, has a pretty scathing article over the election. I feel like this is pretty spot on. The article centers on the impact and influence of podcasts on the key demographics. It's fairly long but well worth the read. https://www.profgalloway.com/the-podcast-election
An excerpt:
Spoiler!
New forms of media periodically reshape our culture and politics. FDR mastered radio, JFK leveraged TV, and Reagan nailed cable news. Obama energized young voters via the internet. Trump hijacked the world’s attention on Twitter. This year it was podcasting. The three biggest media events of this fall were the debate and Harris and Trump’s respective appearances on Call Her Daddy and The Joe Rogan Experience.
Almost half of adult Americans, 136 million people, listen to at least one podcast a month. The global audience is now 505 million, a quarter of the internet’s reach. When Trump went on Joe Rogan, Lex Fridman, and This Past Weekend w/Theo Von, he was embracing the manosphere and riding a tectonic shift in media: The most efficient way to reach the largest and most persuadable audience (i.e., young men) is via podcast. Nothing comes close.
Rogan has 16 million Spotify subscribers and can reach many more people across a variety of other platforms: In just three days after the live podcast, his three-hour-long conversation with Trump was viewed 40 million times on YouTube. The audio downloads likely exceeded 15 million. There will be a lot of second-guessing re what the Harris campaign should have done. Getting on a plane to Austin to visit Rogan would have been a layup.
The democrats don't seem to understand what matters. They seem out of touch. Very good lessons for our parties in Canada to learn too.
__________________
Last edited by FurnaceFace; 11-08-2024 at 07:23 PM.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FurnaceFace For This Useful Post:
It's not a false dichotomy. If you're going to try and gotcha me with a logical fallacy, maybe you should actually know how it works? We call that form of distraction away from the perfectly reasonable argument a red herring. Perhaps you should look it up.
The fact is that they either are ambivalent about his openly racist and misogynistic positions and behavior, making them amoral, or they are very comfortable with it and don't see anything particularly troubling with it, making them immoral. Or they're just ####ing racist and misogynistic, you know, a deplorable human being.
There's no way that anyone could not be keenly aware of who and what Trump is at this point, and to suggest otherwise is pure intellectual dishonesty.
And yes, my neighbors down the street are big Trump supporters. They fall into category "A" of being ambivalent to his racism. I've traveled this state and met some pure evil ####heads who are all in on the white supremacy. They would fall into the latter category of deplorable. They are all fully aware of who he is.
My bad confirmation bias !
It sounds like you are describing a group that acknowledges and respects the significant progress made in areas like racial and gender equality over the past several decades and maintains a more traditional or rigorous standard for what constitutes being labeled a “racist” or “misogynist.” This perspective suggests a focus on maintaining clarity and severity in applying such terms, rather than broadening or lowering the threshold for their use.
This approach might be rooted in the belief that labeling should be reserved for truly egregious acts or ideologies and that diluting these terms risks undermining their gravity and importance in identifying genuine discrimination or hatred.
It sounds like you are describing a group that acknowledges and respects the significant progress made in areas like racial and gender equality over the past several decades and maintains a more traditional or rigorous standard for what constitutes being labeled a “racist” or “misogynist.” This perspective suggests a focus on maintaining clarity and severity in applying such terms, rather than broadening or lowering the threshold for their use.
This approach might be rooted in the belief that labeling should be reserved for truly egregious acts or ideologies and that diluting these terms risks undermining their gravity and importance in identifying genuine discrimination or hatred.
Keep on normalizing! Enjoy your evening.
Did you ask AI to write that for you? Such a dull and boilerplate conservative response with no real novel thinking on the subject. It certainly didn't dispel anything that I said, nor does it counter the direct evidence I provided from actual interactions with human beings where we've discussed these things and they've indicated how they feel.
"When someone shows you who they are, believe them."
I choose to believe someone when they tell me things directly, rather than assume their beliefs based on right wing talking points.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Trumpers are all chests puffed out now...but really all that happened is dumb people elected him. He is still the same orange clown we said he was. Now he has to do the job and it will go exactly how we said it would with blunder after blunder.
I mean we are still waiting for Mexico to pay for that wall right? Like actual adults think you can build a 30 foot wall across an entire boarder...problem solved.
And deporting 20M people? easy peasy...it just costs 10-15K each but maybe Elon will pick up the tab? Oh wait, he is trying to die with the most money possible for scoreboard reasons.
Did you ask AI to write that for you? Such a dull and boilerplate conservative response with no real novel thinking on the subject. It certainly didn't dispel anything that I said, nor does it counter the direct evidence I provided from actual interactions with human beings where we've discussed these things and they've indicated how they feel.
"When someone shows you who they are, believe them."
I choose to believe someone when they tell me things directly, rather than assume their beliefs based on right wing talking points.
Jeez dude you even sound like trump...lol
off the internet now! nighty night don't let the bed bugs bite!
Trumpers are all chests puffed out now...but really all that happened is dumb people elected him. He is still the same orange clown we said he was. Now he has to do the job and it will go exactly how we said it would with blunder after blunder.
I mean we are still waiting for Mexico to pay for that wall right? Like actual adults think you can build a 30 foot wall across an entire boarder...problem solved.
And deporting 20M people? easy peasy...it just costs 10-15K each but maybe Elon will pick up the tab? Oh wait, he is trying to die with the most money possible for scoreboard reasons.
Axe the tax build the home and deport the immigrants. Will be hilarious when it’s like 5M ppl the benefit and the rest suffer.
The Following User Says Thank You to Paulie Walnuts For This Useful Post:
Well he just appointed the first female Chief of Staff in US history, that bloody woman hater lol.
Ease off the cable news and get some fresh air cowboy
Can two things not be accurate. The number of women who have accused him of despicable actions is a much more compelling argument than him appointing a woman into a key position. I think that it is appropriate to judge someone by their comments and their actions more than the fact that they will have a woman appointed to a position in a government.
Well I am guessing you will come up with some trite comment about going to bed or something rather than actually responding to how he has made sexist comments for years.
Can two things not be accurate. The number of women who have accused him of despicable actions is a much more compelling argument than him appointing a woman into a key position. I think that it is appropriate to judge someone by their comments and their actions more than the fact that they will have a woman appointed to a position in a government.
Well I am guessing you will come up with some trite comment about going to bed or something rather than actually responding to how he has made sexist comments for years.
He is a creep who makes disparaging comments about people of specific races, whose entire entrance into politics was based around one of very few black politicians and obviously the only black president not being an American but born in Africa. The guy is a sexist, a racist, a shyster, and a criminal... why is that someone who you would ever want to support?
The Following User Says Thank You to Mean Mr. Mustard For This Useful Post:
He is a creep who makes disparaging comments about people of specific races, whose entire entrance into politics was based around one of very few black politicians and obviously the only black president not being an American but born in Africa. The guy is a sexist, a racist, a shyster, and a criminal... why is that someone who you would ever want to support?
Then he should say either he supports those things or that he is willing to overlook his personality traits and if so for what reason? There is no arguing who he is, just explaining why people think that can be overlooked. How much money does your soul cost?
