Most of the worlds "jungles" are in Central America, northern South America, western Africa, and Southeast Asia.
Arguably, the majority of immigration comes from areas of the world that are not classified as rainforest/jungles. The vast majority of immigration from those countries are from cities.
The comment is just straight up racism
It is.
Should we expect anything less from these scumbags? How is he still pumping Trump. He didn't even get paid.
It is the Justice department, how are they going to stop them?
Right wing nuts: We refuse to let you in to do your job!
Justice department: Well these military guys with guns say you will.
The Following User Says Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Should we expect anything less from these scumbags? How is he still pumping Trump. He didn't even get paid.
his daughter did the media tour a few weeks ago, endorsing Harris and explaining how she has basically lost her dad to Trump and Trumpism. Rudy's just way too far gone at this point. Both the Giuliani and Conway families have been interesting cases in that regard, with one member each completely going off the rails.
his daughter did the media tour a few weeks ago, endorsing Harris and explaining how she has basically lost her dad to Trump and Trumpism. Rudy's just way too far gone at this point. Both the Giuliani and Conway families have been interesting cases in that regard, with one member each completely going off the rails.
Crazy people. Imagine destroying your family so you can suppourt Donald Trump.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Paulie Walnuts For This Useful Post:
That was one thing I thought was dumb about the recent BC election. In the ridings that were too close too call after the voting, it was like damn, I guess we are going to have to count those early votes because they might actually make a difference. I wondered why they didn't do that before hand and then they could add them immediately.
They did count them. The only ones left uncounted on election night were ones that needed verification that the person didn't vote twice which fit into 2 categories:
1) Mail-in ballots received on election day. It would be trivial to vote by mail and then go in on election day to vote in person. So any mail in ballots received at the last minute were held back to verify that the same person didn't show up at a polling station. Mail-in ballots received before election day had already been processed so polling places knew those people had voted already.
2) Ballots where people voted outside their district at a polling place in more remote locations that aren't tied into the main elections database. Again, if you voted in one of those places, you could also show up in your own district and vote there too. And once the votes are in the ballot box, there's no way to undo that, so ones that fit the criteria are held back until they could be transported to each district and cross-referenced against a list of names of people who had already voted.
It's just that when you have a bunch of seats that are super close, a few hundred ballots in each district that fit that criteria can make a difference.
The Following User Says Thank You to opendoor For This Useful Post:
They did count them. The only ones left uncounted on election night were ones that needed verification that the person didn't vote twice which fit into 2 categories:
1) Mail-in ballots received on election day. It would be trivial to vote by mail and then go in on election day to vote in person. So any mail in ballots received at the last minute were held back to verify that the same person didn't show up at a polling station. Mail-in ballots received before election day had already been processed so polling places knew those people had voted already.
2) Ballots where people voted outside their district at a polling place in more remote locations that aren't tied into the main elections database. Again, if you voted in one of those places, you could also show up in your own district and vote there too. And once the votes are in the ballot box, there's no way to undo that, so ones that fit the criteria are held back until they could be transported to each district and cross-referenced against a list of names of people who had already voted.
It's just that when you have a bunch of seats that are super close, a few hundred ballots in each district that fit that criteria can make a difference.
Ahh, I see. That does make it more clear. I figured there was a reason and it just wasn't jumping out at me.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
Oh yeah centre right middle America is gonna jump at the chance to have a gay man a heartbeat away from the presidency. Are we really going to play this game?
He’s in the perfect role. He’s the best communicator they have.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald
Buttigieg should have been the VP nominee. I like Walz, but Pete is the guy we need in a leadership role in this country.
I actually like Pete and think he would be a good leader and President but the 2020 primary has shown that even among the Democrats he has issues with support. The younger progressives of the party apparently hated him.
It is the Justice department, how are they going to stop them?
Right wing nuts: We refuse to let you in to do your job!
Justice department: Well these military guys with guns say you will.
They have very limited jurisdiction over elections. The elections are 50 independent state elections. So the question would be does the voting rights act give them authority to observe elections to ensure the acts requirements are met.
They have very limited jurisdiction over elections. The elections are 50 independent state elections. So the question would be does the voting rights act give them authority to observe elections to ensure the acts requirements are met.
What would give any state the authority to keep a public place from the justice department?
Crazy people. Imagine destroying your family so you can suppourt Donald Trump.
I can't think of any kind of bigger loser in the world then someone 100% tying their personality onto a political party, especially one led by Trump. Being willing to lose your own f'ing family over it? Christ. No joke, that's the most loser thing I can think of.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Huntingwhale For This Useful Post:
I can't think of any kind of bigger loser in the world then someone 100% tying their personality onto a political party, especially one led by Trump. Being willing to lose your own f'ing family over it? Christ. No joke, that's the most loser thing I can think of.
I'm in a Facebook group of home Home Bars and Man Caves. I'm in it to get ideas for my own, but Holy Hell the amount of people that have Trump stuff up in their "Man" Caves is crazy.
Let's take a step back for a second.
If you're a Republican, if you're a Trump supporter, and you have your reasonable reasons for being so... for the purpose of this exercise, let's say that's fine... having a Trump flag, or Trump merchandise up in your home is freakin' weird. In the same way it's weird if you line your home with Biden posters, or Trudeau signs, or Pollievre stickers... it's just ... weird.
__________________ "Calgary Flames is the best team in all the land" - My Brainwashed Son
The Following User Says Thank You to Maritime Q-Scout For This Useful Post:
