American Politics 3.0 - Back to Brunch

[GGG]

Fine in your first post you said Many ways worse. Then in your second post you say vastly superior, then in your third post you say some ways worse.

You start off all authoritative and then slowly soften and walk back your claims. No one would have called you out if you said Vastly superior but some ways worse.

There was no need for Hyperbole.

Before I click any of the above links do they discuss Alien Autopsy results? Last time I followed links you posted the credibility of them left much to be desired. (This one is an attack on your credibility as a poster)

[EldrickOnIce]

Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis

"Spiralling into anarchy" is definitely not melodramatic at all. Not saying it's a great time in America, but it's also not on the verge of becoming Somalia either.

Love Canada, but I don't think there are any circumstances under which we would return. The anarchy/Gilead type topics are classroom discussions at this point, and I don't expect will become a realized threat. In the mean time moving back would cost 50% in lost income (without converting dollars), and then in retirement is just too damn cold. We're here, eligible for citizenship soon, and will be happy to be dual.

[ResAlien]

Every day you survive to sleep another night in your own bed is a victory in today’s America

[Senator Clay Davis]

Your guys ability to make it through every day in near anarchy is incredibly admirable. Thank you for your bravery, may God continue to watch over you.

[Cali Panthers Fan]

In reading the last page or so of posts, I find it hard to know who is actually being serious and who isn't.

Damn post-truth era!

[PepsiFree]

Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald

You (GGG), PepsiFree, and your ilk always attack the individual instead of the argument because you can't defeat the argument. You can only sway people to disagree with the poster on a false argument rather than the content. You have no argument, otherwise you would focus on those points rather than the ad hominem attacks you use so often.

I’ve defeated your arguments so many times, so effectively, that you’ve sent me DMs telling me to go #### myself out of total frustration for not being able to keep up the charade of intellectual authority.

You’ve also gone as far as to disparage the use of facts and links, calling it “google fu” and trying to make fun of people for it. So, idk man maybe pick what you want and everyone can put on the kid gloves you think are soft enough. If you want to actually be taken seriously, maybe don’t make three separate points on the status of a country that each contradict each other and actually provide links that support what your actual point is instead of just show where you erroneously drew your overall conclusion from.

I get it, it’s important to you to always be the expert, from pretending to be a psychologist to pretending to do top level business deals. But maybe try not to lose your #### when someone says “lol dumb watch” like you’re about to single handedly brow beat them into also being mr super duper serious who can’t keep more than one thought in their head!

Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald

Stupid people focus on the stupid issues rather than recognizing the real threats to democracy and threats to our freedoms.

Like aliens? Is one of the stupid issues aliens?

[Dion]

[Lanny_McDonald]

Originally Posted by GGG

Fine in your first post you said Many ways worse. Then in your second post you say vastly superior, then in your third post you say some ways worse.

You start off all authoritative and then slowly soften and walk back your claims. No one would have called you out if you said Vastly superior but some ways worse.

There was no need for Hyperbole.

Before I click any of the above links do they discuss Alien Autopsy results? Last time I followed links you posted the credibility of them left much to be desired. (This one is an attack on your credibility as a poster)

Thank you for proving my point, yet again. Attack the poster, not the content or issue. Marginalize the individual instead of discussing the idea. Twist information from other unrelated topics and change context to try and make the other poster seem wrong. Always the same tactics.

[GGG]

Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald

Thank you for proving my point, yet again. Attack the poster, not the content or issue. Marginalize the individual instead of discussing the idea. Twist information from other unrelated topics and change context to try and make the other poster seem wrong. Always the same tactics.

Pot or Kettle?

[Hemi-Cuda]

As someone who was a big fan of Chuck, this was a little disheartening to read

https://deadline.com/2024/09/zachary...it-1236102955/

[Ped]

Trump's the best choice because of RFK and Tulsi Gabbard? Wow.

[gallione11]

I had to google who that was. Just another Kevin Sorbo level endorsement.

[direwolf]

Originally Posted by gallione11

I had to google who that was. Just another Kevin Sorbo level endorsement.

Yea, I had no idea who he was either. Clearly a nothing endorsement.

[Snuffleupagus]

Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce

Love Canada, but I don't think there are any circumstances under which we would return. The anarchy/Gilead type topics are classroom discussions at this point, and I don't expect will become a realized threat. In the mean time moving back would cost 50% in lost income (without converting dollars), and then in retirement is just too damn cold. We're here, eligible for citizenship soon, and will be happy to be dual.

I hope you're moving from Chicago in retirement then, the lake effect winters there give me the shivers, there are far more warmer climates in Canada then friken Chicago.

[DoubleK]

Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce

We're here, eligible for citizenship soon, and will be happy to be dual.

I thought you were down here way before I was. We crossed the border exactly one year ago today. Doesn't seem like it was that long ago.

I can apply for citizenship on July 1, 2025. I would like to say that I planned it that way, but I am not that clever.

We aren't sure where we are going to retire, we have assets in both countries and will probably keep it that way unless tax rules change significantly.

[Dion]

How is Trump going to spin people leaving his rallies

https://twitter.com/user/status/1840483934208995338

[puffnstuff]

It never happened, and I believe he just blames Dems for not letting all his fans in, that there were 30 or 40000 people that were forced to wait outside.
The crowd size thing really bugs his orangeness.

[Maritime Q-Scout]

Originally Posted by Dion

How is Trump going to spin people leaving his rallies

https://twitter.com/user/status/1840483934208995338

What are you going to do, believe Trump or your own eyes?

C'mon now man. Trump, obviously!

[CorsiHockeyLeague]

Originally Posted by Dion

How is Trump going to spin people leaving his rallies

https://twitter.com/user/status/1840483934208995338

He already has.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/trump-insi...225952072.html

[activeStick]

I forgot there's a VP debate tomorrow. Sounds like Walz is pretty nervous about the debate against Vance, according to CNN.