Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-30-2024, 04:19 PM   #161
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Cost of living and Inflation increase. Let's call it that.

When it comes down to it I don't think Conroy is going to be a big free agent negotiator.

Seems like he's got the plan, and if the term and dollars fit in that plan you're in, if not, buh bye
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2024, 04:25 PM   #162
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Valimaki just signed a 2x2
2x3 for OK seems high and like it or not there is a risk of him not showing up to work
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2024, 04:31 PM   #163
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Cost of living and Inflation increase. Let's call it that.

When it comes down to it I don't think Conroy is going to be a big free agent negotiator.

Seems like he's got the plan, and if the term and dollars fit in that plan you're in, if not, buh bye
On the one hand, I feel like the Flames should just Kylington what he wants since the Flames have practically unlimited cap space.

But like you said, it is nice to see Conroy take a hard stance. He'll need this poise for future UFA negotiations.
1qqaaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2024, 04:33 PM   #164
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

I don't think it's unfair to ask the player to take a 1 year show me deal. Playing half a season after a year and a half out isn't enough.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2024, 04:36 PM   #165
DJones
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

If all he was asking was for a 2nd year it blows my mind that they didn't give him that
DJones is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DJones For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2024, 04:41 PM   #166
Number 39
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Number 39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oakville, ON
Exp:
Default

I look at it this way: Kylington had an injury that limited him to 33 games and 8 points over the last 2 seasons. Thats risky and not grounds for a pay increase or much term. If I’m the Flames I’m wondering why not spend that money on more proven/dependable commodity if it has become contentious?

The whole situation is just odd as by all accounts the Flames have been extremely supportive and it’s hard to imagine a better support situation for him. I would expect that would have value to him.

Having said that, I won’t be losing any sleep if he signs elsewhere. I doubt his leaving will be much of a source of regret if he does move on from the Flames.
Number 39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2024, 04:42 PM   #167
GullFoss
#1 Goaltender
 
GullFoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Exp:
Default

I'm not sure why the flames wouldn't want a longer term as they enter a rebuild. What's the point of getting someone on a home town discount when the team is far below the cap. The difference between $2.5m and $3m also doesn't matter in that context.

Better to sign him to term and hope he outperforms the contact.

Weird decision by the flames imo
GullFoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2024, 04:42 PM   #168
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

If Kylington was the exact same player, coming off the exact same situation, but had played for a different organization, and the Flames were rumoured to be interested in him on July 1, I wonder how we’d feel about a multi year deal for him? I think the lens on this player would be very different.
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2024, 04:50 PM   #169
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GullFoss View Post
I'm not sure why the flames wouldn't want a longer term as they enter a rebuild. What's the point of getting someone on a home town discount when the team is far below the cap. The difference between $2.5m and $3m also doesn't matter in that context.

Better to sign him to term and hope he outperforms the contact.

Weird decision by the flames imo
Maybe they think there is a good chance he signs but doesn't report again.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2024, 04:57 PM   #170
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Steam Whistle View Post
If Kylington was the exact same player, coming off the exact same situation, but had played for a different organization, and the Flames were rumoured to be interested in him on July 1, I wonder how we’d feel about a multi year deal for him? I think the lens on this player would be very different.
I think the raise is what most would object to
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2024, 05:06 PM   #171
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
I think the raise is what most would object to
Fair enough. I wonder if we’d even be anxious to add him to the roster at all. And at this point, he’s just like adding a UFA, so that’s the lens we should be taking to it.
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2024, 05:12 PM   #172
Huntingwhale
Franchise Player
 
Huntingwhale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

I have absolutely no issue with OK heading to UFA. That is his right a player and I'm sure his agent has done their due diligence in determining the player's worth. I'm sure Kylington is grateful to the team for his time away to get better, but that's not a reason to owe them anything. The employer did what they should have, so OK should be forced to stay simply to thank the team for doing their job?

I can think of a few people who have battled mental illness in their life and literally all of them have told me the best thing they did was to get out of Calgary and get a fresh start elsewhere. Not that Calgary itself is the problem, but when you face overwhelming challenges like this where everyday is an inner battle, having a fresh start to reset elsewhere can be the best course of action. For all we know, even though he's grateful for the team's help, he might associate being a Flame with some of the negative challenges he faced. Absolutely nothing wrong with a young guy working to get over his mental challenges wanting a fresh start elsewhere. Anyone who boos him for leaving is a dirty schmuck.
Huntingwhale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2024, 05:19 PM   #173
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ped View Post
A raise on 2.5? Wow.
Most players get a raise when they hit UFA and multiple teams can bid for you.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to The Cobra For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2024, 06:35 PM   #174
Tuco
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: Park Ave SW
Exp:
Default

Bud needs a change of scenery. Won't be missed tbh.
Tuco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2024, 06:40 PM   #175
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Committing 6+ million to a player who may not be able to continue playing any day is a big risk .

And insuring the contract would be extremely expensive this time around
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2024, 06:42 PM   #176
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
Committing 6+ million to a player who may not be able to continue playing any day is a big risk .

And insuring the contract would be extremely expensive this time around
He’s no-more at risk of it than any other player.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2024, 06:46 PM   #177
Flames Fan, Ph.D.
#1 Goaltender
 
Flames Fan, Ph.D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Underground
Exp:
Default

If UFAs are signing in Utah, I never want to hear people saying Calgary is not a good destination.
Flames Fan, Ph.D. is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Fan, Ph.D. For This Useful Post:
Old 06-30-2024, 06:50 PM   #178
Zary's-Mustache
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJones View Post
If all he was asking was for a 2nd year it blows my mind that they didn't give him that
Why would they? He was out for a year and a half getting paid. Rightfully paid but which owner is going to look at that situation and open up his wallet book with such uncertainty?

We see it all the time with physical Injuries where players have to prove they can still play. Well, Kylington has to prove he's over whatever demons he was facing.

It's a business after all and nobody just likes writing cheques they don't have to. Kylington imo needs to prove he is better on a one year deal. I don't see any team giving him longer than one year.
Zary's-Mustache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2024, 06:51 PM   #179
activeStick
Franchise Player
 
activeStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

No idea what number he's asking for, but if it's 3 or less, I don't think that's crazy. I understand that he was out for the majority of his last contract, so didn't get a chance to show he's improved, but I do see his side of it and asking for a slight raise simply because it's a new contract. 2 years instead of 1 also makes a ton of sense for him. As for the Flames, a bit surprised they don't want to go for more than a year given their current state, but maybe for the organization, their current state doesn't matter, which is understandable.
activeStick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2024, 06:52 PM   #180
Major Major
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

My guess is that Murray is involved in these talks and he's not taking kindly to the idea of a raise. It seems like a harmless contract, but I could see how it may not be interpreted that way by the owner.
Major Major is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:14 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy