View Poll Results: Where will the Flames finish in the overall standings in the 24/25 season?
|
32
|
  
|
6 |
1.99% |
31
|
  
|
4 |
1.32% |
30
|
  
|
50 |
16.56% |
29
|
  
|
52 |
17.22% |
28
|
  
|
58 |
19.21% |
27
|
  
|
42 |
13.91% |
26
|
  
|
25 |
8.28% |
25
|
  
|
20 |
6.62% |
24
|
  
|
6 |
1.99% |
23rd or better
|
  
|
39 |
12.91% |
06-27-2024, 11:17 PM
|
#321
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814
Now that Markstrom has been dealt for a 1st in 2025 and Bahl, and Mangiapane has been dealt for Colorado’s 2nd rounder in 2025…
Anyone still wanna argue this isn’t a rebuild?
|
We have to spend $6M just to get to the cap floor with a 19 player roster.
So yeah, unless we sign Guentzel, Marchessault, Montour, and Walker to big money deals it's a rebuild.
It would be a lot of fun to see what/if the Flames spend $30M on.
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 12:47 AM
|
#322
|
Franchise Player
|
Think we’re going to find out in the next week or two what the near future looks like.
They have a ton of cap space. Will conman use it?
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 06:55 AM
|
#323
|
Franchise Player
|
Ask again after free agency.
Clearly the Flames don’t expect to make the playoffs for a couple seasons. And they aren’t going to let any pending UFAs walk.
It remains to be seen if they want to ice a decent team, or are deliberately diving to the bottom of the standings. They may be resigned to not making the playoffs, but still prefer to finish 20th next season than 30th. We’ll have a better idea in a couple weeks.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-28-2024, 06:58 AM
|
#324
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Interesting to see if the sell off continues or if it is on pause until the trade deadline.
To me the vet that makes the most sense to move is Andersson followed by Kadri. With Weegar I prefer to keep him but he would have great value on the trade market.
To me Rasmus is the only guy they should really prioritize moving but everyone is for sale with the right price.
It does look like they will sign vets in free agency but on short term deals those pieces can be flipped for more picks and prospects at future deadlines and drafts.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-28-2024, 07:15 AM
|
#325
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher
Ask again after free agency.
Clearly the Flames don’t expect to make the playoffs for a couple seasons. And they aren’t going to let any pending UFAs walk.
It remains to be seen if they want to ice a decent team, or are deliberately diving to the bottom of the standings. They may be resigned to not making the playoffs, but still prefer to finish 20th next season than 30th. We’ll have a better idea in a couple weeks.
|
I hope they make all or atleast the majority of their picks and stay clear of free agency unless it's a signing with the intention of flipping that player for more assets later. Any packaging of picks I'm hoping is it to move up in the draft and not a trade for a mid 20 NHLer. Use the cap space to take on a bad contract or two don't try to simply move up the standings a spot or two. So far I like the direction but I hope they do this for a few more seasons while drafting top 5 in those seasons. After that sure start trying to speed things up when you have a solid base to build around.
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 07:17 AM
|
#326
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
|
It's not a rebuild
It's a re-configuration
A re-up if you will
__________________
Just trying to do my best
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Hockey_Ninja For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-28-2024, 07:24 AM
|
#327
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Van City - Main St.
|
It's a revamp
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 07:26 AM
|
#328
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Turner Valley
|
Revitalization
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 07:29 AM
|
#329
|
Has Towel, Will Travel
|
At the time of the Huberdeau trade I kind of wanted the Flames to rebuild. I figured the loss of both Gaudreau and Tkachuk was too much of a blow to recover from and that they had a golden opportunity to flip Huberdeau coming off his record setting season and kick start a rebuild/retool. The demise of Huberdeau accentuated that sentiment.
However, I think Huberdeau had to happen so that the Tre/Sutter era could be brought to a conclusion. Tre wasn’t the guy to execute a re-whatever. We needed Connie for that. Without the Huberdeau failure we probably don’t have Connie, and Connie may turn out to be the key piece in the Flames revival. Viewed through that lens, and Huberdeau being a likeable person, I’m okay with how things have played out.
Last edited by Ford Prefect; 06-28-2024 at 10:22 AM.
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Ford Prefect For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-28-2024, 07:29 AM
|
#330
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MOD EDIT: NO
|
A Redux
__________________
MOD EDIT: NO!!!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Two Fivenagame For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-28-2024, 07:45 AM
|
#331
|
Franchise Player
|
Young Guns 2.0
Young Guns Rev. 2
Young Guns Ver. 2.0
Young Guns: Rebirth
Young Guns HD
Young Guns 4K
Young Guns "Same same but different"
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-28-2024, 08:02 AM
|
#333
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
When are we moving Huberdeau?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to BurningSteel For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-28-2024, 08:04 AM
|
#334
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BurningSteel
When are we moving Huberdeau?
|
7 hours, 6 minutes, 33 seconds from right.....now.
Most rebuilding teams never really get rid of every deal.
Chicago was rocking a freshly minted 8 year deal with Seth Jones.
San Jose had a brand new Tomas Hertl deal, and are still rocking a Logan Couture contract.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-28-2024, 08:09 AM
|
#335
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
|
If Conroy is smart, take advantage of the cap to get more picks and prospects for the rebuild
If you have to sign someone, sign someone that you can trade later for profit. Not someone like Huberdeau or Kadri who you are stuck with forever
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 08:13 AM
|
#336
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05
If Conroy is smart, take advantage of the cap to get more picks and prospects for the rebuild
If you have to sign someone, sign someone that you can trade later for profit. Not someone like Huberdeau or Kadri who you are stuck with forever
|
A recent interview I saw with CC, he talked about not giving out contracts that are basically untradeable the second they are signed.
It's in the best interest of the player too. I'd imagine Huberdeau would welcome a change of scenery right now but because he signed that albatross deal he and the Flames are stuck with each other.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-28-2024, 08:40 AM
|
#337
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
|
It looks like a complete tear-down and I'm absolutely here for it. Over the next year, trade guys like Kuzmenko and Andersson as well. Weaponize cap space and take on bad deals for futures. Go and load up on as many picks and prospects as you can.
I know, easy for me to say, being an overseas fan. I get that you still need to fill seats and so on ... but I'm tired of the mediocrity. This franchise has never drafted in the top 3 and only once in the top 5. That is absolutely crazy and I'm fine if that changes. Might as well go to the well a couple of times.
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 08:51 AM
|
#338
|
Ate 100 Treadmills
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz
The Flames didn't draft a franchise center in their last rebuild. They only had one top 5 pick. Not putting all the blame on Bennett, but without him succeeding, there was almost going to be somewhat limited playoff success.
The Flames also failed to draft/develop an elite goalie. But this is tough to criticize, because there's no way to reliably do this. Personally, I believe the problem here has been more with development than with drafting.
But these goalies are largely what end rebuilds. The Rangers got Shesterkin. Tampa got Vasilevsky. Pittsburgh got MAF back in the day. And Washington became a goalie factory in general.
|
Gaudreau emerged as a bit of a unicorn, in that he did a lot of the centre work, but just wasn't big enough to play centre himself. Bennett didn't become a 1st line centre, but he became an almost ideal second line playoff centre.
The Flames had the talent, but lots of other things went wrong. It's a fine line in the NHL betweeen success and failure.
|
|
|
06-28-2024, 09:06 AM
|
#340
|
Ate 100 Treadmills
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
A recent interview I saw with CC, he talked about not giving out contracts that are basically untradeable the second they are signed.
It's in the best interest of the player too. I'd imagine Huberdeau would welcome a change of scenery right now but because he signed that albatross deal he and the Flames are stuck with each other.
|
Huberdeau forced that deal too. His "best interest" was attaining a big pile of money. I do think fans get a bit cynical about the economic side. A player like Huberdeau was likely to get one chance to cash out. At his age, he wasn't signing a 4-5 year deal and then re-signing another good contract after that.
He was coming off as season where he'd set the NHL record for most assists by a LW. It was his time to cash in. His likely only time.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:07 AM.
|
|