Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-17-2024, 09:28 PM   #41
Cycling76er
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Cycling76er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Exp:
Default

I support this ban. Smartphones turn people into mindless zombies.


Sent from my iPhone.
Cycling76er is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to Cycling76er For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2024, 09:34 PM   #42
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
And put them on the kid's face?
I'm glad I didn't have to say it, but ya. That was my second and final thought.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2024, 09:34 PM   #43
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cycling76er View Post
I support this ban. Smartphones turn people into mindless zombies.


Sent from my iPhone.
Thanks for letting us know you posted from your iPhone.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2024, 09:38 PM   #44
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cycling76er View Post
I support this ban. Smartphones turn people into mindless zombies.


Sent from my iPhone.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2024, 10:59 PM   #45
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
Thanks for letting us know you posted from your iPhone.
Thanks for reiterating the joke for us.
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Bill Bumface For This Useful Post:
Old 06-18-2024, 05:19 AM   #46
BigThief
First Line Centre
 
BigThief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
Thanks for letting us know you posted from your iPhone.
There might still be time to delete this.
__________________
MMF is the tough as nails cop that "plays by his own rules". The force keeps suspending him when he crosses the line but he keeps coming back and then cracks a big case.
-JiriHrdina
BigThief is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to BigThief For This Useful Post:
Old 06-18-2024, 06:42 AM   #47
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by malcolmk14 View Post
Imagine a scenario where a student outright refuses to give it up and a teacher is left with a choice of physically overpowering a pre-teen or teenager to take their phone away or move on with their job and teach the 30 other kids in the room.

I know as a 210 pound man if a 12 year old in my class is refusing to give me something I am not risking my safety or my job to lay my hands on them to physically take it.

Or a scenario where the teacher does take the phone and puts it in the office and an irate parent comes to the school at the end of the day accusing the teacher of forcefully taking their child's personal property.



It is certainly helpful when parents are supportive of teachers and on board with consequences. The number of parents who would rather not lay down boundaries and consequences for their kids is growing rapidly. You can imagine it's not a stretch to say that kids who are chronically disrupting class and ignoring rules around phone use are not the ones with the strongest boundaries in place at home.

I think this move by the government is a good one, as it sets clear top-down expectations around phone use. We can now point to legislation to force kids to keep their phones away.
Can’t you just fail them if they refuse to put it away?

I’d basically just say phone away or I’ll assume you’re cheating and if you’re cheating you get 0 / it’ll reflect on your report card.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mr.Coffee For This Useful Post:
Old 06-18-2024, 07:00 AM   #48
Amethyst
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by malcolmk14 View Post

I know as a 210 pound man if a 12 year old in my class is refusing to give me something I am not risking my safety or my job to lay my hands on them to physically take it.
And how does the law change that situation?
Amethyst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2024, 07:18 AM   #49
Raekwon
First Line Centre
 
Raekwon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Airdrie, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
Can’t you just fail them if they refuse to put it away?

I’d basically just say phone away or I’ll assume you’re cheating and if you’re cheating you get 0 / it’ll reflect on your report card.
Fail them? I don't think that is allowed anymore is it? Cellphones should be banned in schools but there is no way the teacher should be the one to enforce this. Parents need to take more responsibility for their kids actions and I like the post above about parents retrieving cellphones from the school after so many offences but 8/10 people here wouldn't go complain to their neighbour, myself included so why should we expect a teacher to be put in that situation. Many parents wouldn't take a phone from their kid and we expect teachers to do it.
Raekwon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2024, 07:21 AM   #50
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raekwon View Post
Fail them? I don't think that is allowed anymore is it? Cellphones should be banned in schools but there is no way the teacher should be the one to enforce this. Parents need to take more responsibility for their kids actions and I like the post above about parents retrieving cellphones from the school after so many offences but 8/10 people here wouldn't go complain to their neighbour, myself included so why should we expect a teacher to be put in that situation. Many parents wouldn't take a phone from their kid and we expect teachers to do it.
I definitely agree but my point was moreso I don’t think the choices for a teacher are a) do nothing or B) wrestle children for their phones, which was what was posited in the post I was responding to.

Like something tells me that a teacher can be more creative with punishment but I fully admit that it’s getting more challenging by the day and that the best answer is parents stepping up and aligning with the teacher.

Kids don’t need phones in classrooms. I think it’s questionable they need phones at all, period, but I’m also not here to judge everyone- just my opinion.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2024, 07:24 AM   #51
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

I don't really get it. Everything here is digital now (middle school on). Assignments given and returned via iPad or Chromebook. Why take this tool away?
Outside of school we limit screen time. As parents.
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2024, 08:06 AM   #52
KTrain
ALL ABOARD!
 
KTrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce View Post
I don't really get it. Everything here is digital now (middle school on). Assignments given and returned via iPad or Chromebook. Why take this tool away?
Outside of school we limit screen time. As parents.
If the majority kids were using this tool in an appropriate manner, this ban wouldn't be happening. If they were diligently taking notes on their phones, researching the topics being discussed by the teacher, engaging in the classroom discourse with what they've learned, this ban wouldn't be happening.

But they're not. They're on social media, messaging, watching unrelated TikTok and YouTube videos.

How do you expect a teacher to monitor that the 30-40 tools are being used appropriately?

Not all parents limit screen time and it shows when the child brings their device to school.
KTrain is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to KTrain For This Useful Post:
Old 06-18-2024, 08:23 AM   #53
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KTrain View Post
If the majority kids were using this tool in an appropriate manner, this ban wouldn't be happening. If they were diligently taking notes on their phones, researching the topics being discussed by the teacher, engaging in the classroom discourse with what they've learned, this ban wouldn't be happening.

But they're not. They're on social media, messaging, watching unrelated TikTok and YouTube videos.

How do you expect a teacher to monitor that the 30-40 tools are being used appropriately?

Not all parents limit screen time and it shows when the child brings their device to school.
I don't expect them to monitor that. It's an impossible situation to put them in. If it is a concern to you, as a parent, enforce your own 'ban' on your own kids' phone. This is possible. It's not malcolmk14's job to do this for me.
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2024, 08:29 AM   #54
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to undercoverbrother For This Useful Post:
Old 06-18-2024, 08:44 AM   #55
nfotiu
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EldrickOnIce View Post
I don't expect them to monitor that. It's an impossible situation to put them in. If it is a concern to you, as a parent, enforce your own 'ban' on your own kids' phone. This is possible. It's not malcolmk14's job to do this for me.
I tend to agree with your posts here. I don't think they should be in younger kids classrooms in any extent. By high school though, kids need to learn to sink or swim in their school/work/life while co-existing with cell phones.
nfotiu is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to nfotiu For This Useful Post:
Old 06-18-2024, 08:46 AM   #56
The Fisher Account
Scoring Winger
 
The Fisher Account's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
Can’t you just fail them if they refuse to put it away?

I’d basically just say phone away or I’ll assume you’re cheating and if you’re cheating you get 0 / it’ll reflect on your report card.
Fail a student? In 2024? That's funny.

My wife would have to apologize to her Principal and the kids parents for even suggesting such a devastating course of action to these little terrors
The Fisher Account is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Fisher Account For This Useful Post:
Old 06-18-2024, 08:54 AM   #57
WinnipegFan
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nfotiu View Post
I tend to agree with your posts here. I don't think they should be in younger kids classrooms in any extent. By high school though, kids need to learn to sink or swim in their school/work/life while co-existing with cell phones.
I would agree with you if the system would allow kids to sink or swim. Unfortunately, society has removed that responsibility for kids and placed it in the teachers. We can’t give zeros, kids aren’t allowed to fail, we are held responsible so at that point we have to remove the “tool” (there is nothing in a classroom that needs a cellphone. A Chromebook is all they need and it’s a quarter of the cost).

We can’t allow cellphones because we have no grounds to manage them. We can’t take them, we can’t evaluate the behaviour they cause, we can’t punish the behaviour, so we are left trying to compete with everything they can access for the students attention. It’s a losing battle, this is a small step in the right direction. It’s more than a device, cellphones have alter brain development in kids and we let it happen.
WinnipegFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2024, 09:09 AM   #58
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

If the schools could block out social media sites, and non essential websites, except maybe research sites.



And block in coming and outgoing calls, except at lunch, or to emergency numbers, that would almost make sense.



I mean, I know we don't have a lot of school shootings in Canada, but access to 9/11 for students might be something to consider.


But the rest isn't needed.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2024, 09:23 AM   #59
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
Hell, I remember having graphing calculators banned becasue we'd program games into them.
And those people work in IT now.

I remember when calculators weren't even allowed. Or when you'd take a test and the teacher would come by and watch you clear the memory to make sure you weren't cheating.

Considering technology now?

On the flip-side however, I also think schools should incorporate a class of technological literacy. This is the future and these kids are by and large being left to figure it out for themselves.

But I hear what Malcolm is saying. He doesnt want to risk his career trying to physically remove something from a kid and then have to deal with the consequences.

Man...I remember if my teacher called my house because I was in trouble I'd be the one getting smacked around by my parents, and now its the teacher who would be in trouble....when did this switch flip?
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Locke For This Useful Post:
Old 06-18-2024, 09:23 AM   #60
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

I feel like not everyone read the article, because some of the reactions don’t totally make sense with what’s actually being proposed. Or maybe people are just reacting to the suggestion they should be banned entirely (which is absurd).

Chalk it up to a broken clock being right twice a day, but I think they actually nailed this one. No cellphones in class, except for educational purposes or those who need them for agreed upon reasons, makes total sense. It helps kids, protects them from dip#### parents who haven’t set proper cellphone boundaries, and gives teachers and schools a “higher power” to defer to if anybody complains.

A total ban would just be entirely out of touch, imo. This isn’t 2004.
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:02 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy