Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-12-2007, 11:28 AM   #21
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

That's a very compeling article, ericschand.

thought this was sorta funny, since this quote is probably a basis for a half a dozen SUV threads on this forum....

Quote:
According to Bradsher, internal industry market research concluded that S.U.V.s tend to be bought by people who are insecure, vain, self-centered, and self-absorbed, who are frequently nervous about their marriages, and who lack confidence in their driving skills.
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 12:20 PM   #22
ken0042
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
 
ken0042's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
Exp:
Default

I also know a few people who have bought SUVs because they wanted all the features of a minivan, but didn't want the stigma that goes with it.
ken0042 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 12:22 PM   #23
Ironhorse
Franchise Player
 
Ironhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ericschand View Post
http://www.gladwell.com/2004/2004_01_12_a_suv.html

Another article on cars and safety. Very interesting read.
Busts numerous myths.
Interesting to read. However, after about half the article, I felt is was written by a Consumer Reports staffer.

We do have a full sized SUV, but not for the reasons mentioned in article; we needed a full sized truck frame & drivetrain to pull our travel trailer. It was either that or buy a pickup and a mini-van, and own 3 vehicles . But I certainly don't have any illusions about it being much safer than a regular car.
Ironhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 02:46 PM   #24
ericschand
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: May 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironhorse View Post
Interesting to read. However, after about half the article, I felt is was written by a Consumer Reports staffer.

We do have a full sized SUV, but not for the reasons mentioned in article; we needed a full sized truck frame & drivetrain to pull our travel trailer. It was either that or buy a pickup and a mini-van, and own 3 vehicles . But I certainly don't have any illusions about it being much safer than a regular car.
I think the overall point was that vehicle safety doesn't depend
on the size of the vehicle, and that consumers are deluding themselves
if they think so.

Even if you are safer, the article does make mention that keeping
control of your SUV/truck is much more difficult (although comparing
to a Porsche isn't valid, how about comparing to a minivan for handling?)

I don't think the article was aimed to discourage large truck use,
rather just giving info to keep you informed.

Since I don't know, are minivans not capable of towing trailers?
I see "normal" cars doing it, can a minivan not?

ers
ericschand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 02:53 PM   #25
ken0042
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
 
ken0042's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ericschand View Post
Since I don't know, are minivans not capable of towing trailers?
I see "normal" cars doing it, can a minivan not?

ers
A typical car will have a towing capacity of around 1500 lbs. A minivan will get you 2500-3000. A properly equiped truck will get you 4000-5000.

(These numbers are appoximate to give a general idea of course.)

As well, I wouldn't want to tow a 2400 lb trailer with a vehicle rated for 2500 lbs through the mountains. I would use a truck with at least 4000 lbs capactiy.
ken0042 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 03:07 PM   #26
nfotiu
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
Exp:
Default

I read this study on driver death rates.

http://www.iihs.org/sr/pdfs/sr4204.pdf

Probably the fairest, and most all-encompassing stat.

Size does matter to some extent.

tiny cars look to be death traps.

Many SUV are amongst the lowest death rates.

German sedans and Lexus's seem to do very well. Most have Electronic stability control and side air bags, which seem to make a big difference.

Surprised that the Astro was number 1.
nfotiu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 03:18 PM   #27
Cube Inmate
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boxed-in
Exp:
Default

I should really trade in my death trap (Sunfire). Does anybody with nothing to live for want to buy a used car??
Cube Inmate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 03:37 PM   #28
firebug
Powerplay Quarterback
 
firebug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mayor of McKenzie Towne
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nfotiu View Post
I read this study on driver death rates.

http://www.iihs.org/sr/pdfs/sr4204.pdf

Probably the fairest, and most all-encompassing stat.

Size does matter to some extent.

tiny cars look to be death traps.

Many SUV are amongst the lowest death rates.

German sedans and Lexus's seem to do very well. Most have Electronic stability control and side air bags, which seem to make a big difference.

Surprised that the Astro was number 1.
From the same site:

http://www.iihs.org/sr/pdfs/sr4205.pdf

I bet you will drive home slower today, and wear your seat belt.

~Bug
firebug is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:27 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy