Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Where will the Flames finish in the overall standings in the 24/25 season?
32 6 1.99%
31 4 1.32%
30 50 16.56%
29 52 17.22%
28 58 19.21%
27 42 13.91%
26 25 8.28%
25 20 6.62%
24 6 1.99%
23rd or better 39 12.91%
Voters: 302. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-11-2024, 03:10 PM   #161
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shazam View Post
Could it take 10 years? Yup.
That shouldn't be the plan. I highly doubt it was Tampa Bay's.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 03:11 PM   #162
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

There isn't one set blueprint for rebuilding a team into a
cup contender.

And aside from doing the right things, you also need some luck along the way. For example, when you draft a future ELC Norris winner in the 3rd round he doesn't force his way out of your org before even playing a game for you.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 03-11-2024, 03:16 PM   #163
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

It usually takes a few attempts as well.

Colorado got Mackinnon but had to bottom out again before getting really good. Chicago went into a rebuild, and blew it up again and are rebuilding again.

Tampa had to bottom out a few times.

3 years is aggressive, and who knows what happens. Could be a Dallas style rebuild with young stars surrounding overpaid vets. They also got really lucky and have not made much noise in the playoffs.

Once names start getting attached to those picks we will have a better idea. I know they want a good team to open up the new arena, but 3 years is very very aggressive.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 03:29 PM   #164
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
It usually takes a few attempts as well.

Colorado got Mackinnon but had to bottom out again before getting really good. Chicago went into a rebuild, and blew it up again and are rebuilding again.

Tampa had to bottom out a few times.

3 years is aggressive, and who knows what happens. Could be a Dallas style rebuild with young stars surrounding overpaid vets. They also got really lucky and have not made much noise in the playoffs.

Once names start getting attached to those picks we will have a better idea. I know they want a good team to open up the new arena, but 3 years is very very aggressive.
The Stars haven't made much noise in the playoffs? They went to the finals 4 years ago and the conference finals last year. That's pretty noisy.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 03:30 PM   #165
Shazam
Franchise Player
 
Shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
That shouldn't be the plan. I highly doubt it was Tampa Bay's.
Plans go awry all the time.
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
Shazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 03:35 PM   #166
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
It usually takes a few attempts as well.

Colorado got Mackinnon but had to bottom out again before getting really good. Chicago went into a rebuild, and blew it up again and are rebuilding again.

Tampa had to bottom out a few times.

3 years is aggressive, and who knows what happens. Could be a Dallas style rebuild with young stars surrounding overpaid vets. They also got really lucky and have not made much noise in the playoffs.

Once names start getting attached to those picks we will have a better idea. I know they want a good team to open up the new arena, but 3 years is very very aggressive.
And some luck. Do the Avs win a cup if Makar is picked first and they take Heiskenan or Patrick? (BTW, NJ, they also won because they made a big OFFSEASON trade for a goalie).
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 03:35 PM   #167
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shazam View Post
Plans go awry all the time.
No ####. That's not the point. The point is that a poster said they should plan for a 10 year rebuild.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 03:53 PM   #168
Monahammer
Franchise Player
 
Monahammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

SJ is getting Celebrini. His dad worked for the golden state warriors lol. It's been preordained for years.

But it would be super annoying for Chicago to land him. Celebrini-Bedard would be awful to play against in the future, I am certain.
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 04:11 PM   #169
Sylvanfan
Appealing my suspension
 
Sylvanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrentCrimmIndependent View Post
Well, Hamilton was/is a great player and his acquisition turned into Lindholm and Hanifiin, so he was hardly a mistake on the last GMs end.

You guys are making an example of the wrong "Ham-" player trade lol.

It's the Hamonic trade you don't want to repeat while you're still mid-development of your next core.

Hamilton was young and good, and they asset managed him outstandingly. I'd be down for an other Hamilton addition in year 2-3.
You are making the mistake of evaluating the result of the trade as opposed to the behavior of the organization. Trade results can have variability that really can not always be predicted. Sometimes the result is good, sometimes it's poor. But the behavior to make both trades was identical and that was the flaw.

Go back and check on how Colorado and Tampa eventually got to where they're at. Both teams did mostly build and trade veterans for younger players trying to establish themselves before moving multiple picks for immediate help.

I'm criticizing the behaviors of the organization. That same behavior is why the team never is good for more than a one year stretch before falling apart.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
Sylvanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Sylvanfan For This Useful Post:
Old 03-11-2024, 04:15 PM   #170
Shazam
Franchise Player
 
Shazam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
No ####. That's not the point. The point is that a poster said they should plan for a 10 year rebuild.
He never said that Tampa planned for a 10 year rebuild.

Simply that it took 10 years.

We don't know if Tampa planned a 10 year rebuild. They probably didn't.

Such is how these things go. It is a risk.
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
Shazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 04:19 PM   #171
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
No ####. That's not the point. The point is that a poster said they should plan for a 10 year rebuild.
I concur with my colleague, the PM. They could miss the playoffs by a wide margin next year and still make the playoffs in the final year of the dome.

This will go faster if they refrain from handcuffing themselves to bad contracts July 1.

And keep an eye on the influx of Russians. Conroy added five of them, and I don’t think he likes how the Flames have historically ignored Russia over the last 20 years.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 04:22 PM   #172
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shazam View Post
He never said that Tampa planned for a 10 year rebuild.

Simply that it took 10 years.

We don't know if Tampa planned a 10 year rebuild. They probably didn't.

Such is how these things go. It is a risk.
Rebuilds don't usually work. We should plan to never be successful.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 04:26 PM   #173
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Rebuilds where you dissolve the winning culture and replace it with show up and collect your paycheck culture and don't retain a good supporting cast that can supplement the top young players that come in from lottery picks are the ones that fail.

It's more important to continue playing to win even without the pieces they need than people realize. Bottoming out won't even get them into the top 5 anyways.
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TrentCrimmIndependent For This Useful Post:
Old 03-11-2024, 04:30 PM   #174
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
The Stars haven't made much noise in the playoffs? They went to the finals 4 years ago and the conference finals last year. That's pretty noisy.
RIght. I forgot I thought it was Colorado in the WCF last year.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2024, 04:35 PM   #175
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Rebuilds work all the time - all you need is to be competitive and interesting with your own homegrown players.

That usually comes with a ten year window, maybe 15 if you’re transcendently good.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2024, 08:34 PM   #176
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

No place for hiding, baby
No place to run
You pull the trigger of my

Young guns (young guns)
Young guns
Young guns (young guns)
Young guns
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2024, 08:46 PM   #177
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

This team suuuuuuuuucks haha
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2024, 09:01 PM   #178
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Dallas Stars drafted very well

The Flames scouting staff is not in the same tier.

They are the exception not the norm
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2024, 09:03 PM   #179
All In Good Time
First Line Centre
 
All In Good Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: I'm somewhere where I don't know where I am
Exp:
Default

The interesting phase will be the second or third year of eight or nine thousand empty seats in the rink
All In Good Time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2024, 09:34 PM   #180
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05 View Post
Dallas Stars drafted very well

The Flames scouting staff is not in the same tier.

They are the exception not the norm
2nd best drafting team according to a recent analysis
Dallas first
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:24 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy