[Signing] Flames sign Miromanov to extension (2 yrs, $1.25 mil AAV)

[Caboose]

I gotta agree, this Sharangovich guy looks worse with every passing game! /s

[cannon7]

Originally Posted by Caboose

I gotta agree, this Sharangovich guy looks worse with every passing game! /s

CP: Where you can say a player exceeded your expectations and people will still come back at you with "see? he be good?"

[dino7c]

Originally Posted by cannon7

ok.

lol, Sharky with the 4 point game

[dino7c]

Originally Posted by cannon7

CP: Where you can say a player exceeded your expectations and people will still come back at you with "see? he be good?"

Guy you said "Still not thrilled with the return on that trade" like 2 hours ago. It was a slam ####ing dunk...eat some crow

[jaikorven]

Originally Posted by TrentCrimmIndependent

Hopefully the next wave of players actually want to re-sign and be a part of the ongoing core. Not always with one foot out the door like this last batch of UFAs.

Definitely tired and over that ####.

Out of thanks but OMG you are so right on this.

[Wastedyouth]

Originally Posted by Zary's-Mustache

This reminds me of when my mom and dad split up and my dad accused my mom of taking less for the sale of the house just to spite him.

The house was for sale on MLS for 60 days. Everyone had a chance to offer what they thought the house was worth and my dad thought it was too low. Thoughts dont matter dad, the value is what the buyers are willing to pay.

Ya dad!

[dino7c]

Looking at some of the Other trades the Flames got the best value anyway

Lindholm is the trade of the deadline and the others are well within market value

[Ba'alzamon]

Originally Posted by dino7c

Looking at some of the Other trades the Flames got the best value anyway

Lindholm is the trade of the deadline and the others are well within market value

Well. I think you can make the argument that the Ducks getting a first for Henrique ranks right up there.

[VilleN]

Originally Posted by cannon7

Can you point out where I said he was a terrible player?

I did say he was a minus player on a powerhouse Devils team. And *check notes* he's still a -13 with the Flames.

I'll admit he has exceeded my expectations, but not by a significant degree. He posted 24 goals previously with the Devils. and with pretty cushy minutes with the Flames is on pace for 29.

Still not thrilled with the return on that trade, though.

The trade was a clear win. Everyone sees the impact Sharangovich is having on the team - he's a great player. He's now playing centre, and doing very well at it... You were wrong, your take on him was negative (as usual) - if you fail to see that I don't know what to tell you.

Your certainty regarding Miromanov is ridiculous, and to be honest it's very simple minded and shows a complete lack of self-awareness - you, like the rest of us have no idea how this is going to turn out, yet somehow you have this unfounded certainty that this was a poor move.

[cannon7]

Originally Posted by VilleN

The trade was a clear win. Everyone sees the impact Sharangovich is having on the team - he's a great player. He's now playing centre, and doing very well at it... You were wrong, your take on him was negative (as usual) - if you fail to see that I don't know what to tell you.

My take was on the trade overall. But pile on little man.

I don't think Sharangovich is a good C. He has a good shot and good chemistry with Huberdeau. But as a C he lost 9 out of the 10 face offs he had last night and is 38% on the season. Think he will inevitably be moved back to wing. He's also getting the cushiest minutes on the team, 87% offensive zone starts last night.

Uh oh. Did I say something not strictly positive about the Yaegormeister? Sue me.

Originally Posted by VilleN

Your certainty regarding Miromanov is ridiculous, and to be honest it's very simple minded and shows a complete lack of self-awareness - you, like the rest of us have no idea how this is going to turn out, yet somehow you have this unfounded certainty that this was a poor move.

Can I have your house for a paperclip? Why not? You never know, there may be a massive worldwide shortage of paperclips tomorrow. Don't be so simple minded as to assume the value of a paperclip! Be more self aware! You know nothing of paperclip futures.

[Icon]

Any word if Miro's in the lineup tomorrow?

[dissentowner]

I have no idea what this player will be but it sounds like he has a great attitude and a lot of skill, hopefully this is a great find by our scouting staff. I thought initially he was just a throw in for contract reasons but apparently there is belief he just needs a chance to shine. I am intrigued regardless to see what we got here.

[getbak]

Originally Posted by Icon

Any word if Miro's in the lineup tomorrow?

I'd think so. He'll likely take Gilbert's spot considering Gilbert played less than 4 minutes last night.

[SuperMatt18]

One thing I found interesting...we all know how great Pachal has been for the Flames...it was actually Miromanov returning from injury that caused the Knights to waive Pachal.

So Vegas actually seemed to think more highly of Miromanov than they did of Pachal.

Miromanov was placed on a conditioning stint on Jan 23rd, Pachal was waived Feb 3rd (think they were trying to sneak him down on the all-star break), and Miromanov returned to the lineup on Feb 8th.

[AC]

^ They mentioned during the intermission chat last night that Pachal called Miromanov the best player he's ever played with at bringing the puck up the ice. He was also QBing the PP when Theodore and Pietrangelo were out.

Really curious to see what he can do in a bigger role. Conroy and his crew seem to have an eye for these types of players now.

[GioforPM]

Originally Posted by AC

They mentioned during the intermission chat last night that Pachal called Miromanov the best player he's ever played with at bringing the puck up the ice. He was also QBing the PP when Theodore and Pietrangelo were out.

Ready made pairing of teammates?

Weegar Andersson
Kylington Hanley
Pachal Miromanov

Gru waiting in the wings to be the Tanev to Kylington

[SuperMatt18]

Kylington and Hanley are both LH and Pachal and Miromanov are both RH.

I'd go:

Weegar-Andersson
Kylington - Pachal (they have 57% xGF together, don't break it up)
Grush/Hanley - Miromanov

[TrentCrimmIndependent]

How's Grusch looked on the Wranglers?

[Icon]

Originally Posted by TrentCrimmIndependent

How's Grusch looked on the Wranglers?

I thought he was good in the game I was at last weekend. Couple noticeable nice plays.

Scorp on here said he thought he was the Wranglers best D that game, I would have put him behind Aspirot I think.

[GioforPM]

Originally Posted by SuperMatt18

Kylington and Hanley are both LH and Pachal and Miromanov are both RH.

I'd go:

Weegar-Andersson
Kylington - Pachal (they have 57% xGF together, don't break it up)
Grush/Hanley - Miromanov

THat's fine. I think Pachal is a potential 4D anyway. He's only 24.