Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-28-2024, 02:45 PM   #25801
MacDaddy77
First Line Centre
 
MacDaddy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mass_nerder View Post
Don't want to rain on the parade, but the last team he played for professionally was the Lehigh Valley Phantoms, so I'm guessing it's just the last set of gear he had.


I'm enjoying reply's with Gifs more than I should
MacDaddy77 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to MacDaddy77 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2024, 02:45 PM   #25802
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cannon7 View Post
I rolled my eyes at this part. Unfortunately it's probably true.

Quote:
The Calgary Flames, desperate for playoff revenue, may consider Markstrom a keeper.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2024, 02:53 PM   #25803
Groot
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Groot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
I rolled my eyes at this part. Unfortunately it's probably true.
Ya I'm sure Murray is salivating at the prospect of an extra 4-5 million that a round would generate. /s
Groot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2024, 02:56 PM   #25804
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
I rolled my eyes at this part. Unfortunately it's probably true.
Two points for keeping Markstrom that aren't playoff revenue.

1. great goalies don't come around very often, it gives wolf time to over mature.
2. the team being competitive is better for prospect development then bottoming out. ( that said, being competitive isn't great for prospect procurement).
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to TheIronMaiden For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2024, 02:59 PM   #25805
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeman4Gilmour View Post
https://www.nhl.com/flames/video/bar...-6347861881112

They just decided to keep him off the ice Huska said.
Naw, this was in the game. He had a broken skate lace or something and he had to take off his entire left pad and retape his skate boot.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2024, 03:04 PM   #25806
Flames1217
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheIronMaiden View Post
Two points for keeping Markstrom that aren't playoff revenue.

1. great goalies don't come around very often, it gives wolf time to over mature.
2. the team being competitive is better for prospect development then bottoming out. ( that said, being competitive isn't great for prospect procurement).
Only problem with this is that, right now at this very moment Goalies are at an all time high in value.

There are quite a very contenders with weak goaltending or teams that have crashed (like New Jersey) due to weak goaltending.

I understand in an ideal world Wolf has a superstar as a mentor but we will never get the rumoured package again for Marky.

It's essentially now or never and getting back Mercer or a first + is more than worth it.
Flames1217 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2024, 03:05 PM   #25807
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cannon7 View Post
My understanding is Boston wants to keep both goalies for the stretch drive and playoff run, if they are going to make one available it will be in the offseason.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2024, 03:07 PM   #25808
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
I rolled my eyes at this part. Unfortunately it's probably true.
Hasn't this never been less true?

They moved their leading goal and point producer, their 5th dmen, their number one center, and are about to move both members of their top defense pairing but we still want to hang this on the owner being greedy because they held the line on their goaltender with two years left on his contract?
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2024, 03:13 PM   #25809
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
My understanding is Boston wants to keep both goalies for the stretch drive and playoff run, if they are going to make one available it will be in the offseason.
That’s why I think they should trade Markstrom now
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bonded For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2024, 03:17 PM   #25810
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheIronMaiden View Post
Two points for keeping Markstrom that aren't playoff revenue.

1. great goalies don't come around very often, it gives wolf time to over mature.
2. the team being competitive is better for prospect development then bottoming out. ( that said, being competitive isn't great for prospect procurement).
If they’re even their usual try hard selves next year, we don’t get a 1st round pick.

Punt the ball.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2024, 03:18 PM   #25811
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Hasn't this never been less true?
I don't know Bingo. I didn't write the article. Fluto Shinzawa clearly has heard this from someone in league circles.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2024, 03:27 PM   #25812
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
I don't know Bingo. I didn't write the article. Fluto Shinzawa clearly has heard this from someone in league circles.
I was responding to you thinking it was true, not to a Boston writer from across the continent taking a stab at something with zero knowledge.

Nothing "clearly" about it.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2024, 03:30 PM   #25813
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheIronMaiden View Post
Two points for keeping Markstrom that aren't playoff revenue.

1. great goalies don't come around very often, it gives wolf time to over mature.
2. the team being competitive is better for prospect development then bottoming out. ( that said, being competitive isn't great for prospect procurement).
3. Giving Montreal an 11th overall pick
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2024, 03:31 PM   #25814
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

If Edwards was "desperate" for the 5M in revenue he would probably have been open to shedding salary instead of spending to the cap every year not to mention paying multiple coaches every year.
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Jacks For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2024, 03:32 PM   #25815
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
I rolled my eyes at this part. Unfortunately it's probably true.
I think it just shows how out of touch with the Flames some of these Athletic reporters are.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2024, 03:38 PM   #25816
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
I think it just shows how out of touch with the Flames some of these Athletic reporters are.
Someone from Boston telling us they are desperate for playoff revenue, after traded away 3 players, and have 3 more potentially to go.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2024, 03:38 PM   #25817
metroneck
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: NorthVan
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Funkhouser View Post
Jumping on a flight to YYC. I expect when I get wifi again to be bombarded with trade news. Don’t let me down Connie!
Was thinking the same thing as I got on my 6 hour flight.

Just landed. Happy to land, but disappointed.
metroneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2024, 03:49 PM   #25818
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
That’s why I think they should trade Markstrom now
Agreed

I think in the offseason you could see a goalie trade market that includes:

Ullmark
Saros
Markstrom
Thompson
Gibson
Binnington

And then you also have the following veteran free agents:

Cam Talbot: .913
Jonathan Quick: .916
Anthony Stolarz: .925
Laurent Brossoit: .922
Alex Nedeljkovic: .915
Kaapo Kahkonen: .901
MA Fleury: .899

Suddenly teams looking for a goalie in a trade have other top end options available potentially if Ullmark and Saros hit the market. And while none of those free agents are long term solutions, the Devils might think it's better to keep the assets, and just sign a veteran that can play 40 games and share the net with Daws.

I've made way too many posts about this in the past week, but I really can't shake the feeling that the Flames really missed an opportunity to sell Markstrom at peak value to the Devils a week or two ago, and potentially were too focused on a single player as the return.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2024, 03:54 PM   #25819
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

It ain't over until the deadline. Lots of time for teams to circle back. If they were as close as they reportedly were. There's always the strong possibility it gets revisited before things cross the deadline.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2024, 03:55 PM   #25820
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
I've made way too many posts about this in the past week, but I really can't shake the feeling that the Flames really missed an opportunity to sell Markstrom at peak value to the Devils a week or two ago, and potentially were too focused on a single player as the return.
From what I gather it wasn’t a disagreement over a player that was the snag, but the pick that the Devils would have to give up for two years retention on Markstrom.

But yeah, it will be a missed opportunity if the trade market this summer is soft, and they end up moving Markstrom at the deadline next season for a 2nd and a 3rd.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:51 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy