Quote:
	
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by keenan87  I am a little confused. Every year, GMs make dumb moves by paying way too much for depth players. 1st round picks get traded for players worse than Tanev.
 So, for some reason - this is the year GMs have smartened up? The year the Flames need the seller market to be hot and when players are doing their part by playing well.
 
 Weird.
 | 
	
 
I do wonder much of it is some of the more prominent media markets (Toronto, Boston specifically) trying to indicate the market is soft due to their lack of picks. 
Toronto: 2 picks in the first 2 rounds the next 3 years (2024 1st, 2026 1st)
Tampa Bay: 3 picks (2026 1st, 2025 2nd, 2026 2nd) 
Boston: 3 picks (2025 1st, 2026 1st, 2026 2nd) 
Florida: 3 picks (2025 2nd, 2026 1st, 2026 2nd) 
Rangers: 4 picks (2024 1st, 2024 2nd, 2025 1st, 2026 1st) 
Detroit: All 6 picks 
Carolina: 7 picks (All picks, extra 2nd in 2024) 
Colorado: 4 picks (2024 1st, 2025 1st, 2026 1st, 2026 2nd) 
Vancouver: 4 picks (2025 1st, 2025 2nd, 2026 1st, 2026 2nd) 
Winnipeg: 5 picks (2024 2nd, 2025 1st, 2025 2nd, 2026 1st, 2026 2nd) 
Dallas: 5 picks (2024 1st, 2024 2nd, 2025 1st, 2026 1st, 2026 2nd) 
Vegas: All 6 picks 
Nashville: 9! Picks (4 1sts, 5 2nds) 
I'd look for Carolina, Dallas, Detroit, Vegas, and potentially Nashville to likely start to become a bit more aggressive with their draft capital over the next week. 
Nashville is on a role and has a ton of picks and capspace ($30M below the cap) they really could do something aggressive IMO.