Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-18-2024, 12:30 PM   #22541
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David View Post
It only takes one team out of the equation. There are still (rumoured) buyers out there.
But only a small handful where he's willing to extend for a potential sign & trade.

Here's hoping though. There could still be some serious competitors to land his services. I think Tampa could be one. And hanifin purportedly was interested in Florida (hopefully meaning the state) long term.
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2024, 12:32 PM   #22542
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

If it's an unprotected first,I would strongly consider it. That's a top 10 pick for sure, maybe even top 5. Crouse is a good young player to add, imagine adding Lindstrom and Dickinson with the Flames and coyotes picks then Iginla with the devils pick (if it happens).
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2024, 12:37 PM   #22543
The Original FFIV
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

Could be something. Could be nothing. But Boston waiving Oskar Steen today. Will have to maximize cap space if they want to bring in Hanifin.
The Original FFIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2024, 12:57 PM   #22544
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrentCrimmIndependent View Post
But only a small handful where he's willing to extend for a potential sign & trade.

Here's hoping though. There could still be some serious competitors to land his services. I think Tampa could be one. And hanifin purportedly was interested in Florida (hopefully meaning the state) long term.
Tampa imo would have to swing a deal to gain the assets they would need to land Hanifin before a trade would be possible. Unless they are including their 2026 1st they really have nothing of interest currently.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2024, 01:02 PM   #22545
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan403 View Post
Saw a rumor of Raz & Mang to the Coyotes for Crouse, Soderstrom & a 24 1st

https://www.nhltraderumor.com/nhl-tr...-coyotes-deal/
This sounds like made up crap to me. The Coyotes have been interested in Hanifin the whole year, I have never heard anything about them wanting Andersson nor do I think the Flames would even entertain trading Rasmus unless it was something you couldn't say no to and that is not it.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2024, 01:05 PM   #22546
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
This sounds like made up crap to me. The Coyotes have been interested in Hanifin the whole year, I have never heard anything about them wanting Andersson nor do I think the Flames would even entertain trading Rasmus unless it was something you couldn't say no to and that is not it.
I think it is made up. It is from some website that repackages CapFriendly proposals as real rumors.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2024, 01:12 PM   #22547
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Tampa imo would have to swing a deal to gain the assets they would need to land Hanifin before a trade would be possible. Unless they are including their 2026 1st they really have nothing of interest currently.
There would be worse things than having another potential shot at McKenna. That kids looks elite. Not sure what else Tampa could add.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2024, 01:17 PM   #22548
Groot
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Groot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
I think it is made up. It is from some website that repackages CapFriendly proposals as real rumors.
The package on capfriendly they pulled it from is actually not the worst as it also includes 4 second round picks, and Ruzicka lol.
Groot is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2024, 01:24 PM   #22549
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
There would be worse things than having another potential shot at McKenna. That kids looks elite. Not sure what else Tampa could add.
The Flames need to mix in some 2025/2026 1sts so that they're not banking most of their rebuild on a weaker draft. If the hope is 2027 then encapsulate the whole next 3 years in the plan to accrue NHL talent.
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TrentCrimmIndependent For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2024, 01:26 PM   #22550
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Nothing from hockeytraderumor or thehockeywriters is worth a damn. No better than Eklund.
Toonage is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Toonage For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2024, 01:49 PM   #22551
Sandman
Franchise Player
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
I'm not sure how you come to that.

ARZ's 2024 1st is currently poised to be 6th. Soderstrom is a good prospect, and Crouse is better than Mangiapane.

I'd consider that a slam dunk "W" for the Flames to get 6th Overall, Soderstrom, and Crouse for Mangiapane and Andersson.

That's turning one good asset (Andersson) who is older, one absolute bleh asset in Mangiapane into 3 very good pieces.

I'd take that trade today if it was on the table.

(the rumour doesn't appear to be real on any level...but it's good value for CGY)
I tend to agree. The first alone would be huge. Not that it’s real or anything.
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2024, 01:57 PM   #22552
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

ARZ want Hanifin or Andersson? They have ample great assets to move for one of them. Pony up.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2024, 02:10 PM   #22553
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrentCrimmIndependent View Post
The Flames need to mix in some 2025/2026 1sts so that they're not banking most of their rebuild on a weaker draft. If the hope is 2027 then encapsulate the whole next 3 years in the plan to accrue NHL talent.
Also spread out contracts so that you can have some stars on entry level contracts.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Badgers Nose For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2024, 02:27 PM   #22554
HitterD
Powerplay Quarterback
 
HitterD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In my office...is it 5:00 yet???
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrentCrimmIndependent View Post
The Flames need to mix in some 2025/2026 1sts so that they're not banking most of their rebuild on a weaker draft. If the hope is 2027 then encapsulate the whole next 3 years in the plan to accrue NHL talent.
Totally agree that this should be the goal and approach. My only caveat to the above is that teams may be much more hesitant to move 1sts in future drafts that are a.) perceived to be in stronger drafts and b.) less certainty where the draft pick might land of the trading team has a bad year.

I’d for sure be pushing for a mix of 2024 and 2025 for sure, but if teams are unwilling I’ll gladly still take all 2024 picks if we have no other options
HitterD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2024, 02:39 PM   #22555
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

I am hearing rumblings that Shane Wright is frustrated with the way the Kraken have handled him and is looking for a change of scenery. That would be a perfect guy to take a chance on for Calgary except the price would be high for a division rival and Seattle is set on defence and does not need Markstrom.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2024, 02:40 PM   #22556
Heavy Jack
Franchise Player
 
Heavy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the studio
Exp:
Default

Would love to swing for Shane Wright
Heavy Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2024, 02:46 PM   #22557
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I'd move one of the extra 1sts for Wright. Odds of impacting the NHL are equal. And you get a 200ft RHS center. Who still incredibly young. Yes please.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2024, 02:47 PM   #22558
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

PLD 2.0 ….. no thanks. The flames also value rookie development, he ain’t gonna like it here either.
Scroopy Noopers is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Scroopy Noopers For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2024, 02:49 PM   #22559
Buff
Franchise Player
 
Buff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
I am hearing rumblings that Shane Wright is frustrated with the way the Kraken have handled him and is looking for a change of scenery. That would be a perfect guy to take a chance on for Calgary except the price would be high for a division rival and Seattle is set on defence and does not need Markstrom.
Maybe Seattle would like to complete their Tanev collection?
Buff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2024, 02:50 PM   #22560
Buff
Franchise Player
 
Buff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers View Post
PLD 2.0 ….. no thanks. The flames also value rookie development, he ain’t gonna like it here either.
I'm not sold on Wright's hype either but I doubt he's the head case that PLD seems to be
Buff is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:55 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy