| 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-16-2024, 06:17 AM | #21 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Toronto, Ontario      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by jg13  Knies + Cowan + 1st? Even then I don't think it's enough. |  
I like the idea of shooting high but to me I think he’s overvalued with his major deficiency being his size. With this package it’s pretty much the normal equivalent of three first round picks. I don’t think Toronto does it. I could see Knies, 2nd, 3rd but more? Naa. They value Knies a lot.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-16-2024, 06:20 AM | #22 |  
	| Powerplay Quarterback | 
 
			
			Keep him, he’s got a solid contract and decide at a later time if he’s apart of the long term plan.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-16-2024, 06:20 AM | #23 |  
	| Powerplay Quarterback 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Ontario      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by bluejays  I like the idea of shooting high but to me I think he’s overvalued with his major deficiency being his size. With this package it’s pretty much the normal equivalent of three first round picks. I don’t think Toronto does it. I could see Knies, 2nd, 3rd but more? Naa. They value Knies a lot. |  
Personally not really interested in LH LW Knies as the main piece coming back for our prime-age 1st/2nd pairing RHD on a very good contract for the next 2 yrs.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Mitch For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
 
	
		
			| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cycling76er For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-16-2024, 06:30 AM | #25 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2014 Location: Indiana      | 
 
			
			I'd rather trade Andersson the following season. The Flames have enough pending UFAs to deal with now, AKA all of the defensemen except Weegar and Andersson.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 1qqaaz For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-16-2024, 06:32 AM | #26 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Toronto, Ontario      | 
 
			
			If defence takes longer to develop we should be keeping building that out now. Wolf is a smaller guy and getting large defence to clear out the front will be necessary. Big generally equals slower which is a concern but if all the chips are in on Wolf it’s the way it’s gotta be.  The sudden “leak” of Andersson is a bit suspicious. I wonder with the movement of people if he’s indicated he’d prefer being moved?
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-16-2024, 06:51 AM | #27 |  
	| First Line Centre | 
 
			
			An Andersson deal makes way more sense at the draft unless the return is absurd. Carol8na would be a good suitor, they have a ton of UFA defenseman and some good chips,
 To CAR
 Andersson
 
 To CGY
 Necas
 Nikishin
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-16-2024, 06:56 AM | #28 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			I'm a big fan of Rasmus, so unless the deal is ridiculous, I'd much rather keep him. Weekes seems like the least reliable insider, so until someone reliable reports this, I'm not too concerned...
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-16-2024, 07:02 AM | #29 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			The only way flames would consider trading Anderson right now is if hanifin signed an extension with flames. No chance they would trade 3 of their 4 top d men .
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-16-2024, 07:07 AM | #30 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by kyuss275  The only way flames would consider trading Anderson right now is if hanifin signed an extension with flames. No chance they would trade 3 of their 4 top d men . |  
Really depends on if they want Andersson past his current contract.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-16-2024, 07:10 AM | #31 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Flames Town      | 
 
			
			Here are a few deals I would make in a heart beat:
 1. Andersson for Wyatt Johnson
 2. Anderssonn for Lucas Raymond
 3. Andersson for Ekblad + Lundell
 4. Andersson for Chychrun + 1st
 5. Andersson for Neighbours + Parayko
 
 Then build the defense around Weegar + Kylington. Audition the young guys for this season and in the off-season, pick up a couple guys on rental deals while the young guys progress.
 
				 Last edited by keenan87; 02-16-2024 at 07:13 AM.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-16-2024, 07:11 AM | #32 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Bonded  Really depends on if they want Andersson past his current contract. |  
I get that but they need dmen for next year. They will probably eventually trade him but I highly doubt it’s this year.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-16-2024, 07:14 AM | #33 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by kyuss275  I get that but they need dmen for next year. They will probably eventually trade him but I highly doubt it’s this year. |  
If the return is killer why not? They can get filler D from the UFA market.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-16-2024, 07:32 AM | #34 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: CGY      | 
 
			
			I see no way Rasmus is traded unless the return blows our minds. 
 You need veterans in a retool and Rasmus is a top pairing guy. If Hanifin somehow decides to stay it would make more sense to cash in on the last couple years of the sweetheart deal Andersson is on
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-16-2024, 07:38 AM | #35 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			Defencemen are so important and they age well. The Flames have two good youngish ones  and really ought to keep both if they can. There's no-one in the system ready to replace them and no guarantees that a good prospect turns out to be as good.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to edslunch For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-16-2024, 07:39 AM | #36 |  
	| Scoring Winger | 
 
			
			Wow wasn't expecting Andersson's name out there, the only reason I can't see this happening is that without Tanev and Andersson we're left with one RHS on D (Weegar), and all of our upcoming D prospects are LHS.
 Makes me think that if a trade would happen with Andersson, Conroy would likely be targeting a RHS D in a potential return. Righties are arguably worth even more in a trade though, and Andersson's contract is fantastic for what he provides... interesting.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Ashes For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-16-2024, 07:44 AM | #37 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: San Fernando Valley      | 
 
			
			I don't know about this as I feel he's future captain material.  Seems like a guy the organization should keep as a building block as he's been solid for the team and seems to have more fire than other players on the roster.  IMO it's more that teams are calling and not that the Flames are shopping him.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-16-2024, 07:48 AM | #38 |  
	| Scoring Winger 
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Spruce Grove      | 
 
			
			I think everyone is putting a lot of thought into a Weekes rumour. He’s a horrible insider.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-16-2024, 07:48 AM | #39 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: May 2016 Location: ATCO Field, Section 201      | 
 
			
			I don't take this too seriously. Before the deadline is over Conroy will have had taken a call on every player that holds value. I would imagine his answer is 'if you over pay any player is available'.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  02-16-2024, 07:52 AM | #40 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			All Weekes is saying is teams are calling about Andersson which isn't farfetched at all. No where did Weekes say he will be traded.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to jg13 For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:57 PM. | 
 
 
 |