Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Other Sports: Football, Baseball, Local Hockey, Etc...
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-25-2024, 04:36 PM   #1701
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

It's effing crazy that we are only a month away from camps opening up and their are enough good players unsigned that you could probably almost build a competitive team from them.

Lok at the rotation you could make for example:

Snell
Montgomery
Bauer
Urias
Ryu
German
Clevinger
Lorenzen
Carrasco
Wood
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 01-25-2024, 05:43 PM   #1702
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
It's effing crazy that we are only a month away from camps opening up and their are enough good players unsigned that you could probably almost build a competitive team from them.

Lok at the rotation you could make for example:

Snell
Montgomery
Bauer
Urias
Ryu
German
Clevinger
Lorenzen
Carrasco
Wood

Yeah, the FA pitchers this year were really deep. Frankly I'm shocked teams didn't load up on them to take a run at it via pitching. Some of those guys surely can't be asking for greater than 3 years but for some reason MLB GMs are suddenly spend shy. Very very odd when there's that level of talent out there nobody is biting.
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2024, 09:18 PM   #1703
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluejays View Post
Yeah, the FA pitchers this year were really deep. Frankly I'm shocked teams didn't load up on them to take a run at it via pitching. Some of those guys surely can't be asking for greater than 3 years but for some reason MLB GMs are suddenly spend shy. Very very odd when there's that level of talent out there nobody is biting.
I think there are enough teams concerned about the future of their TV revenues that the market is weak.

Then once other GMs realize that they lower their bids as well.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bizaro86 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-26-2024, 02:42 AM   #1704
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

That’s probably it. It’s been going on a couple years now where the normal reckless teams who would give the large contracts have suddenly been responsible.
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2024, 08:57 AM   #1705
Inferno
Franchise Player
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Pas, MB
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/user/status/1750727156706005309
Inferno is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Inferno For This Useful Post:
Old 01-30-2024, 06:59 AM   #1706
KootenayFlamesFan
Commie Referee
 
KootenayFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/user/status/1752330315614347474
KootenayFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to KootenayFlamesFan For This Useful Post:
Old 01-30-2024, 07:07 AM   #1707
KootenayFlamesFan
Commie Referee
 
KootenayFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
Exp:
Default

1 year deal apparently?
KootenayFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to KootenayFlamesFan For This Useful Post:
Old 01-30-2024, 07:29 AM   #1708
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

Big meh from me. Still a day to day upgrade on IKF.
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 07:33 AM   #1709
Cheese
Franchise Player
 
Cheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KootenayFlamesFan View Post
1 year deal apparently?



1 year 13 Mill


https://www.mlb.com/bluejays/news/ju...blue-jays-deal


Even at age 38 last season, the longtime Dodger was productive in his debut with Boston. Turner slashed .276/.345/.455 for the Red Sox, hitting 31 doubles and 23 homers and driving in 96 runs.
Cheese is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 07:49 AM   #1710
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Not a fan of this signing, its seems like the Jays really could not generate anything....

In my view, Jays are going to struggle offensively.
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 08:19 AM   #1711
howard_the_duck
#1 Goaltender
 
howard_the_duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I like Turner. If it comes down to 1 year of him vs overpaying for ~3 years for Soler, I like this option. Keeps flexibility on rebuilding if indeed that is where things need to go.

Hoping this isn't the only bat we add, however.
howard_the_duck is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to howard_the_duck For This Useful Post:
Old 01-30-2024, 08:47 AM   #1712
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

Yeah. Perhaps the only thing I’ve been impressed this offseason is not overpaying for anyone because they are forced to show something. Atkins and Shapiro haven’t financially f’d themselves for the future over a bad signing, so that should be commended. Perhaps the bar is that low these days but it’s a positive.
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 08:57 AM   #1713
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

The 1 year deal is a big plus. But I'd rather have 1 better player than two middling options - you only get to play 1 guy per position at a time. I'd have rather seen them try and outbid the Dodgers for Teoscar than pay IKF+Turner more combined money.

Overpayment for 1 year doesn't hurt a potential future rebuild. But if you're bring back this team with worse hitting than last year...
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 09:20 AM   #1714
Jiggy_12
Franchise Player
 
Jiggy_12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

I like the 1 year, that at least keeps the risk very low.

I just don’t think there’s much upside here, but we did need a power bat and run generator, and based on last year - he will do that.

This should be a playoff team but I see nothing to suggest we have improved
Jiggy_12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 09:48 AM   #1715
ben voyonsdonc
Franchise Player
 
ben voyonsdonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by howard_the_duck View Post
I like Turner. If it comes down to 1 year of him vs overpaying for ~3 years for Soler, I like this option. Keeps flexibility on rebuilding if indeed that is where things need to go.

Hoping this isn't the only bat we add, however.
If they plan to mostly use Turner at DH (Morosi expects him to be the primary DH), I guess the Jays are out on Soler because he can’t be an everyday fielder.

The lineup still desperately needs a power bat to give Vladdy protection - we can’t have a rotating group of non power bats in the clean up position like last year. Turner is very good hitter but he’s a 20-25 home run guy and the Jays need a 30-40 home run guy.
ben voyonsdonc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 10:04 AM   #1716
KelVarnsen
Franchise Player
 
KelVarnsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Apartment 5A
Exp:
Default

Very much a meh signing.

It improves the F grade I gave the Jays offseason but only to a D. I don’t think you can say the Jays actually improved their team this offseason.

They really are hoping Vladdy and Kirk return to form but hope isn’t a plan.
KelVarnsen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 10:43 AM   #1717
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiggy_12 View Post
I like the 1 year, that at least keeps the risk very low.

I just don’t think there’s much upside here, but we did need a power bat and run generator, and based on last year - he will do that.

This should be a playoff team but I see nothing to suggest we have improved
Yeah, I think on the offensive side of the ball they're probably going to be about the same IKF+Turner is not any better than Chapman+Belt I don't think, but maybe you figure on a bounce back from Vlad or Kirk.

Pitching is probably a wash at best, with Ryu and Hicks out and the likelihood they'll be less healthy next year.

So unless someone Davis Schneider turns out to be Mookie Betts 2.0 or someone else like Tiedeman or Martinez comes up and makes a big splash I don't think this team is any better than last year. They were a good but not great team last year.

The rays with no Wander Franco are probably worse, but NYY added and they get Aaron Judge back for the season so they'll likely be better, and Baltimore is still on the upswing imo (they outperformed last year but another year of experience would improve their young core so that's probably a wash).

So basically another bubble playoff team seems likely here. I think the most likely path to improvement would be if they end up with a couple guys earning that 5 spot (eg Manoah+Tiedeman, or whatever) and deal one of them for a 3B bat. I'm keeping the Manoah for Elly De La Cruz dream alive!
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 11:11 AM   #1718
howard_the_duck
#1 Goaltender
 
howard_the_duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ben voyonsdonc View Post
If they plan to mostly use Turner at DH (Morosi expects him to be the primary DH), I guess the Jays are out on Soler because he can’t be an everyday fielder.

The lineup still desperately needs a power bat to give Vladdy protection - we can’t have a rotating group of non power bats in the clean up position like last year. Turner is very good hitter but he’s a 20-25 home run guy and the Jays need a 30-40 home run guy.
I suspect bench bat that platoons is all that's left for them to add unless they manage to offload salary in a trade and add something more significant.

Underwhelming offseason to be sure. The spectrum from Ohtani and all-in to this is certainly a wide gap.
howard_the_duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2024, 11:18 AM   #1719
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

On the face of it it's not bad... I think Turner is a perfectly acceptable replacement for Belt.

I am kind of worried that this means that IKF is going to be slotted in as an everyday player. IKF is not perfectly acceptable replacement for Chapman.

Last edited by Parallex; 01-30-2024 at 11:21 AM.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Parallex For This Useful Post:
Old 01-30-2024, 11:21 AM   #1720
KelVarnsen
Franchise Player
 
KelVarnsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Apartment 5A
Exp:
Default

Well Vladdy is going to be on the cover for MLB The Show 24 so that's something?
https://blog.playstation.com/2024/01...o-jr-march-19/
KelVarnsen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:58 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy