01-12-2024, 10:52 AM
|
#16721
|
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-12-2024, 10:54 AM
|
#16722
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
|
I knew what to do!
I opened an awkwardly titled brand new thread! 
|
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-12-2024, 11:23 AM
|
#16723
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
They don't need to be comparable for it to hurt the value for a return. "A poor man's version" is still a cheaper alternative for a team looking for c depth
|
Monahan isn't a poor man's version of Lindholm though. He is a poor man's version of Dylan Strome
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bonded For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-12-2024, 11:34 AM
|
#16724
|
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-12-2024, 11:37 AM
|
#16725
|
|
Franchise Player
|
^Friedman I believe speculated that a trade or buyout may be in the books for Elvis and CBJ.
|
|
|
|
|
01-12-2024, 11:41 AM
|
#16726
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
The only places that make sense for Elvis already have good goalies. That being Vegas or Nashville, Tennessee.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-12-2024, 11:43 AM
|
#16727
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
That will be a tough contract to move...
Would the Oilers and Jackets look at a Merzlikins for Campbell swap?
|
|
|
|
|
01-12-2024, 11:45 AM
|
#16728
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
That will be a tough contract to move...
Would the Oilers and Jackets look at a Merzlikins for Campbell swap?
|
You mean a Merzlikins for Broberg + Holloway + 1st + 2nd + Campbell swap?
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to topfiverecords For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-12-2024, 12:17 PM
|
#16729
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by topfiverecords
You mean a Merzlikins for Broberg + Holloway + 1st + 2nd + Campbell swap?
|
Oilers would likely have to add - but not that much.
Merzlikins makes more and has one extra year left on the deal.
Over the last two years:
Campbell - 0.886 -21.1 GSAA
Merzlikins - 0.890, -22.5 GSAA
Last edited by SuperMatt18; 01-12-2024 at 01:28 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
01-12-2024, 12:42 PM
|
#16730
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
Oilers would likely have to add - but not that much.
Merzlikins makes more and has one extra year left on the deal.
Over the last two years:
Campbell - 0.886 -21.1 GSAA
Merzlikins - 0.890, -22.5 GSAA
|
contracts?
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
|
|
01-12-2024, 01:27 PM
|
#16731
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
contracts?
|
Merzlikins - 29 years old - 3 more seasons at $5.4M
Campbell - 32 years old - 3 more seasons at $5.0M
I had thought Campbell only had 2 years left on his deal so was wrong about that. Term remaining is equal, Campbell is $400k cheaper, Merzlikins is 3 years younger.
Oilers would have to add but IMO it feels like the starting point for both teams to give their goalies a fresh start.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-12-2024, 01:39 PM
|
#16732
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Just realized with all this trade talk that if the flames squeak in to the playoffs they may end up giving up this years first (20-32nd overall). I think I'm reading the conditions correctly?
|
|
|
|
|
01-12-2024, 01:41 PM
|
#16733
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbull8
Just realized with all this trade talk that if the flames squeak in to the playoffs they may end up giving up this years first (20-32nd overall). I think I'm reading the conditions correctly?
|
The picks for teams that make the playoffs begin at 17th overall, so they would need to be the strongest wildcard team in the NHL to hit 20th overall.
And even then, that would just give Montreal the option to take that pick.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Freeway For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-12-2024, 01:43 PM
|
#16734
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freeway
The picks for teams that make the playoffs begin at 17th overall, so they would need to be the strongest wildcard team in the NHL to hit 20th overall.
And even then, that would just give Montreal the option to take that pick.
|
And if that pick ends up being Tij...
|
|
|
|
|
01-12-2024, 01:59 PM
|
#16735
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbull8
Just realized with all this trade talk that if the flames squeak in to the playoffs they may end up giving up this years first (20-32nd overall). I think I'm reading the conditions correctly?
|
That's ok. We'll have New Jersey's first, Colorado's first, Toronto's first, and Dallas' first.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to topfiverecords For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-12-2024, 02:13 PM
|
#16736
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Every day changes my thoughts on what is the likely trade scenarios this season for the flames. A week ago, I could see the flames trading all of Lindholm, tanev, Hanifin and Markstrom. A couple days ago, I could see the flames only trading Lindholm and tanev. Now, I could see it being Lindholm, Tanev and Markstrom.
|
|
|
|
|
01-12-2024, 02:15 PM
|
#16737
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freeway
The picks for teams that make the playoffs begin at 17th overall, so they would need to be the strongest wildcard team in the NHL to hit 20th overall.
And even then, that would just give Montreal the option to take that pick.
|
go ahead
would rather get it out of the way with it not being a high pick
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-12-2024, 08:16 PM
|
#16738
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Freidman says the ask for cutter Gauthier towards Colorado was Byram, so that might curtail some speculation concerning the player, since the avalanche turned it down.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Harry Lime For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-12-2024, 08:27 PM
|
#16739
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Like Dubnyk and Talbot, whoever gets Campbell next will get a pleasant surprise.
The Oilers blaming goalies for their demise is a tradition like no other, as is trying to bury players in the minors or shutting them up by paying them under the table to go on LTIR and keep their mouth shut.
Oilers will not think twice about that trade, even to retain, as the new guy will be blamed when they lose our of the first round or not even make the playoffs.
Meanwhile, good chance that CLB will have a decent goalie for a couple years.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to browna For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-12-2024, 09:00 PM
|
#16740
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Lime
Freidman says the ask for cutter Gauthier towards Colorado was Byram, so that might curtail some speculation concerning the player, since the avalanche turned it down.
|
The Avs may not have Gauthier high on their rankings list either. Tough to know.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:39 AM.
|
|
