Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-06-2024, 11:43 PM   #15841
jg13
Franchise Player
 
jg13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

they need to move Hanifin and do everything in their power to have him sign an extension with the team he is traded to.
jg13 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jg13 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-06-2024, 11:44 PM   #15842
Niemo
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Niemo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

I’m not against resigning Hanifin if it means we can trade Rasmus.
Niemo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Niemo For This Useful Post:
Old 01-06-2024, 11:44 PM   #15843
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Re-signing Hanifin would be pretty stupid. Let’s see what happens.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mr.Coffee For This Useful Post:
Old 01-07-2024, 12:01 AM   #15844
Matty81
Franchise Player
 
Matty81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

I wonder if the Flames are really worried about losing a top ten pick next year in the Monahan deal and it potentially prevents them from fully embracing a rebuild and encourages making a move like re-signing Hanifin

While Florida seem good right now, their goalie is ancient and stranger things have happened, if Florida miss the playoffs next year the flames will likely lose their first rounder, unless it's 1st overall. A scenario where the team sucks all year and then loses the 2nd or 3rd overall pick would be pretty much catastrophic for the team big picture.

Of all the bad moves Treliving made that trade has potential to be the worst one by far.
Matty81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2024, 12:06 AM   #15845
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty81 View Post
I wonder if the Flames are really worried about losing a top ten pick next year in the Monahan deal and it potentially prevents them from fully embracing a rebuild and encourages making a move like re-signing Hanifin

While Florida seem good right now, their goalie is ancient and stranger things have happened, if Florida miss the playoffs next year the flames will likely lose their first rounder, unless it's 1st overall. A scenario where the team sucks all year and then loses the 2nd or 3rd overall pick would be pretty much catastrophic for the team big picture.

Of all the bad moves Treliving made that trade has potential to be the worst one by far.
After the Panthers make the playoffs this year, the major risk of our own 2025 1st pick lowers significantly.

Then, so long as Florida’s pick isn’t top-10, Montreal gets Florida’s pick.

I would not bank on Florida’s 2025 1st being top-10. They’re a good team with a good core, and are also going to have a lot of salary cap flexibility.

It’s much, much more likely that Montreal gets Florida’s 2025 pick than anything else at this stage.
ComixZone is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 01-07-2024, 12:24 AM   #15846
Matty81
Franchise Player
 
Matty81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
After the Panthers make the playoffs this year, the major risk of our own 2025 1st pick lowers significantly.

Then, so long as Florida’s pick isn’t top-10, Montreal gets Florida’s pick.

I would not bank on Florida’s 2025 1st being top-10. They’re a good team with a good core, and are also going to have a lot of salary cap flexibility.

It’s much, much more likely that Montreal gets Florida’s 2025 pick than anything else at this stage.
If Florida misses the playoffs in 2025 and their pick is a lottery pick (top 16), the flames do not get the 2025 pick and it rolls over to 2026 (link).

The Habs then get the Flames 2025 1st round pick unless it's 1st overall. And in that 1st overall scenario the Habs also get the flames 3rd and the better pick out of Cgy/Florida in 2026.

Basically if the Panthers miss the playoffs next year the flames are probably ####ed REALLY badly. I don't think it's likely either, as they have a good team and I'm sure my prayers to the hockey gods will help too. But I wonder if it gives mgmt. pause on tearing it down... your ownership of your own first is completely contingent on the performance of another team.

Such a terrible, terrible trade, the risk level is insane. If the flames lose a top 5 pick that would be right up there with the Gilmour deal.
Matty81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2024, 12:27 AM   #15847
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

This article states that the 2025 1st round pick is top-10 protected, not top-16 protected.

PuckPedia also confirms - the 2025 FLA 1st is top-10 protected, not top-16

The concern around Florida not being good next year is a reach. They’re a good team. The risk is there, but it is not excessive.

(Dang that Monahan to Montreal trade was brain dead work by Tree regardless of the conditions though. Spending a 1st to dump 1 season of Monahan was moronic)

Last edited by ComixZone; 01-07-2024 at 12:32 AM.
ComixZone is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 01-07-2024, 12:32 AM   #15848
Matty81
Franchise Player
 
Matty81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
This article states that the 2025 1st round pick is top-10 protected, not top-16 protected.

The concern around Florida not being good next year is a reach. They’re a good team.
I want you to be right, but capfriendly also says lottery protected not top 10. I think we need the Panthers to make the playoffs.

I do agree that Florida missing the playoffs is not the likely scenario, but I don't think them slipping into 17th or 18th place is completely unrealistic. I just wonder if that figures into the flames planning at all.
Matty81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2024, 01:05 AM   #15849
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

I assumed that "lottery protected" meant the Flames would get the pick unless it won the lottery, not just being in the lottery.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2024, 01:53 AM   #15850
Angelino
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Angelino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sunny California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty81 View Post
I wonder if the Flames are really worried about losing a top ten pick next year in the Monahan deal and it potentially prevents them from fully embracing a rebuild and encourages making a move like re-signing Hanifin

While Florida seem good right now, their goalie is ancient and stranger things have happened, if Florida miss the playoffs next year the flames will likely lose their first rounder, unless it's 1st overall. A scenario where the team sucks all year and then loses the 2nd or 3rd overall pick would be pretty much catastrophic for the team big picture.

Of all the bad moves Treliving made that trade has potential to be the worst one by far.
I know Christmas has passed, but Treliving is the gift that keeps giving. The ghost of Treliving past.
__________________

Angelino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2024, 02:26 AM   #15851
Hackey
#1 Goaltender
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Trading a 1st to get rid of 1 year of Monahan so you could add 7 years of Kadri is almost as bad as turning Matthew Tkachuk into 8 years of Jonathan Huberdeau.

BUT.....depending what happens with that 1st the Monahan trade could still pull ahead.
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hackey For This Useful Post:
Old 01-07-2024, 02:29 AM   #15852
Sec214
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja View Post
https://twitter.com/user/status/1743815410892591587

Don’t know if this has been posted yet
__________________
Sec214 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Sec214 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-07-2024, 02:30 AM   #15853
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackey View Post
Trading a 1st to get rid of 1 year of Monahan so you could add 7 years of Kadri is almost as bad as turning Matthew Tkachuk into 8 years of Jonathan Huberdeau.

BUT.....depending what happens with that 1st the Monahan trade could still pull ahead.
So far Kadri hasn't been a bust, and especially this season, he is living up to his salary. How the contract ages is a concern and we'll have to wait and see about that. With Monahan, there was some concern about whether he would be a productive player ever again.

How that 1st rounder plays out is a huge difference maker though. I support the Kadri signing and moving Monahan, but not sure if it was worth a 1st rounder to do it. I also think Kadri has trade value, not likely a 1st round pick value, but positive trade value nonetheless.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
Old 01-07-2024, 03:14 AM   #15854
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Shedding Monahan definitely wasn't worth the first, but I guess it's also clear the Flames got the best of his career, even now.

In MTL: 64GP 16G 24A

Love the guy, but he's just an OK NHLer now whose held together by metal plates and super glue. A far cry from his sniper years next to Gaudreau, but certainly of a player of value down any one's line up.

Hopefully the 1st situation brings as little pain as possible, and hopefully MTL botches whichever pick they end up getting.

We need not suffer more for Treliving's poor decisions.
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2024, 03:28 AM   #15855
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
I don't want to keep any of them. It's not a core worth locking into further than they already have.
I'm going to side with this.

It's not that the player isn't appealing individually, it's that the Flames need a new mix in that dressing room, and they could never get it done with this core anyways so I don't know why retaining parts of it for big money is feasibly going to bring about any different results.

If they could cut ties with every one here and now but the young guys I'd do it.

It's funny and tragic to me that the Flames' only strength on paper is their D, and yet their defense is as porous as its ever been. It's really atrocious, and often Markstrom is the only line of defense between them and the abyss.

Hanifin signs for 7M and eases off that contract year level of intensity, and I'm sure we'll really love this guy...

Just take the haul, man. Speaking of that, why aren't we sitting on more 1sts yet! Where's the re-tool/build/set?

Pretending to part ways with players only to re-sign them in the 11th hour isn't a retool. Need to stop falling in love with mediocrity!
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2024, 03:39 AM   #15856
Sofa GM
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Re-signing Hanifin would be a really bad move for the Flames. If they do that then they have to move Andersson. Something of value has to be moved to acquire offensive talent. Andersson retained would get a haul, perhaps even a couple of those Sabres prospects.

I personally would be fine retaining Hanifin if it meant moving Andersson to the Sabres for Ostlund+Kurich……. Dare to dream.

Then move Lindholm to Colorado for a package around Byram. It’s just that easy… hahaha.
Sofa GM is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2024, 05:31 AM   #15857
Flames1217
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sofa GM View Post
Re-signing Hanifin would be a really bad move for the Flames. If they do that then they have to move Andersson. Something of value has to be moved to acquire offensive talent. Andersson retained would get a haul, perhaps even a couple of those Sabres prospects.

I personally would be fine retaining Hanifin if it meant moving Andersson to the Sabres for Ostlund+Kurich……. Dare to dream.

Then move Lindholm to Colorado for a package around Byram. It’s just that easy… hahaha.
If the Flames recoup solid A/B+ prospects for both Lindholm and Tanev they should be fine. Defenders take longer to develop and having a d-corps featuring Hanifin, Anderson and Weegar isn't a bad thing.

Conroy has to focus on getting back quality pieces for both though and hopefully not picks in 2026. If he intends on keeping the D together I would hope he is aiming for prospects who are already on the verge of playing and contributing in the NHL.
Flames1217 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2024, 06:41 AM   #15858
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty81 View Post
If Florida misses the playoffs in 2025 and their pick is a lottery pick (top 16), the flames do not get the 2025 pick and it rolls over to 2026 (link).

The Habs then get the Flames 2025 1st round pick unless it's 1st overall. And in that 1st overall scenario the Habs also get the flames 3rd and the better pick out of Cgy/Florida in 2026.

Basically if the Panthers miss the playoffs next year the flames are probably ####ed REALLY badly. I don't think it's likely either, as they have a good team and I'm sure my prayers to the hockey gods will help too. But I wonder if it gives mgmt. pause on tearing it down... your ownership of your own first is completely contingent on the performance of another team.

Such a terrible, terrible trade, the risk level is insane. If the flames lose a top 5 pick that would be right up there with the Gilmour deal.
It was a terrible trade but according to that article the Habs get the lower of the picks if Florida’s pick is not top 10. So as long as Florida makes the playoffs or finishes lower than 11th the Flames are guaranteed to not give up a top 10 pick.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2024, 07:46 AM   #15859
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angelino View Post
I know Christmas has passed, but Treliving is the gift that keeps giving. The ghost of Treliving past.
He was desperate. He knew he was running after the contract is over. He didn’t care what would happen after. Total fraud.

Last edited by Flamesfan05; 01-07-2024 at 07:48 AM.
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flamesfan05 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-07-2024, 07:47 AM   #15860
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
It was a terrible trade but according to that article the Habs get the lower of the picks if Florida’s pick is not top 10. So as long as Florida makes the playoffs or finishes lower than 11th the Flames are guaranteed to not give up a top 10 pick.


Go Tkachuk go
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:59 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy